Case law

State v. Lyon

304 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1987

In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), we held that polygraph evidence is not admissible, over proper objection, in any civil or criminal trial in this state. … Cullin v. State, 565 P2d 445,457 (Wyo 1977). Accord Corbett v. State, supra. We noted in Brown that the leading case on stipulations for the admission of polygraph evidence is State v.

Johnson v. McGrew

137 Or. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 1995

In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … See State v. Norris-Romine/Finley, 134 Or App 204 , 894 P2d 1221 , rev den 321 Or 512 (1995).

Wiley v. SAIF

337 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

See Krushwitz v. … See Norpac Foods, Inc. v.

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Revenue

321 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1995

For example, in this case, the Tax Court discounted an appraisal performed by taxpayer’s appraiser, Brown, in part, because Brown “was not aware of $6 million of functional obsolescence in the Boardman sale and admitted * … In this case, the Tax Court overruled its previous decision in Johnson v.

Federal Express Corp. v. Estrada

275 Or. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 2015

Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132, 134 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). … With those arguments in mind, we consider whether the board’s order is supported by substantial evidence and reason, as ORS 183.482(8)(c) requires. See Hamilton v.

Wiley v. SAIF

337 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

See Krushwitz v. … See Norpac Foods, Inc. v.

Vaughn v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.

289 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1980

Cf., Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 607-609 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978). The state has a substantial interest in protecting the integrity of its workers’ compensation system. … (NLRB) and the State Employment Relations Board (ERB).

Boger v. Norris & Stevens, Inc.

109 Or. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1991

They rely, inter alia, on Wilson v. … Affirmed. 1 The court conducted a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of plaintiffs’ “scientific evidence” under State v. Brown, supra.

State v. Reed

83 Or. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 417 . … See State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 417 and n 5. 4 In State v.

Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.

184 Or. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2002

Id. at 177 (citing Wilson v. P.G.E. Company, 252 Or 385, 390-92, 448 P2d 562 (1968); Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391, 396 , 946 P2d 324 (1997), rev den, 327 Or 317 (1998)). … Brown, 150 Or App at 395 n 4 (citing Hickey v. Settlemier, 141 Or App 103, 108 , 917 P2d 44 , rev den, 323 Or 690 (1996)); see also Brown v. J. C.

Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J

301 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1986

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986)(searches and seizures), State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983)(double jeopardy); Hewitt v. … Des Moines Community School Dist., 393 US 503 , 89 S Ct 733 , 21 L Ed 2d 731 (1969); James v. Board of Education of Central Dist.

State v. Vaughn

92 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1988

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986); State v. … State v. Brown, supra. Defendant argues that the automobile exception is not applicable in this case, because it applies only to vehicles which are mobile when lawfully stopped.

Gritzbaugh Main Street Properties, LLC v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

207 Or. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 2006

DEITS, J. pro tempore Plaintiffs petition for reconsideration of our opinion in Gritzbaugh Main Street Prop. v. … Plaintiffs rely on the following cases: Kallstrom v. Kallstrom, 265 Or 481 , 509 P2d 1195 (1973); Montgomery v. Wadsworth Plumbing, 278 Or 455 , 564 P2d 703 (1977); Jewell v.

Friberg v. Elrod

136 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1930

Jackson County, supra; Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron Works, 166 Fed. 398, 403, 405 ( 93 C. C. A. 162 ); Sweeney v. U. S., 109 U. S. 618 ( 27 L. Ed. 1053 , 3 S. Ct. 344 ). … Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Latif v. Holder

28 F. Supp. 3d 1134 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 24, 2014

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. … Jifry v.

Elsea v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

277 Or. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2016

It was legally permissible for the board to make that determination in its weighing of the evidence. See Martin v. … evaluation of that evidence was reasonable.”); Armstrong v.

West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West Linn

349 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2010

The Ninth Circuit rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the city had effected a per se taking of its money and the plaintiffs citation to Brown v. … Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142 , 117 P3d 990 (2005) (citations omitted).

Kellotat v. Cupp

78 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

Under those circumstances we think the state should have a reasonable opportunity to conform its procedure to the new rule announced in Brown. We conclude, therefore, that State v. … Fair, supra, characterized its decision in State v. Brown, supra, as made under the Oregon Constitution.

McDowell v. Employment Department

348 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2010

See Henthorn v. … See generally City of Portland v.

Mansker v. Astoria

100 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1921

See, also, McGough v. Lancaster Burial Board, L. R. 21 Q. B. Div. 323 (57 L. J. Q. B. (N. S.) 568, 36 Week. Rep. 822, 52 J. P. 740). 16, 17. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.