Case law

Larch Mountain Invest. Co. v. Garbade

41 Or. 123 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1902

A meeting of the board of directors was thereupon called, and a resolution passed authorizing the redemption. … There is nothing in the opinions in Willis v. Smith, 36 Or. 601 ( 58 Pac. 527 ), or Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 ( 64 Pac. 304 ) to conflict therewith.

Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.

266 Or. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2014

See Cabal v. … E.g., Ogan v.

Engweiler v. Persson

354 Or. 549 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 2013

State v. Engweiler, 118 Or App 132 , 846 P2d 1163 , rev den, 317 Or 486 , (1993) (Engweiler I). 2. Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 43 , 103 P3d 1201 (2005) (Engweiler II). 3. Engweiler v. … Board of Parole, 343 Or 536 , 175 P3d 408 (2007) (Engweiler V). 6. State ex rel Engweiler v. Powers, 232 Or App 214 , 221 P3d 818 (2009) (Engweiler VI). 7. State ex rel Engweiler v.

Consolidated Ranches, Inc. v. Chase Land & Cattle Co.

242 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

Brown called the Mayfields while Eslinger was in Brown’s office, and both Eslinger and Brown informed them that they would receive the $25,000. … Company v. Oregon Automobile Ins. Company, 242 Or 407 , 408 P2d 198 (1965). Affirmed.

Powell v. Employment Dept.

347 Or. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026

See Ringo v. … And to the extent that claimant argues that the board’s conclusion that claimant resigned to avoid discharge 64 Powell v. Employment Dept.

State v. Reed

268 Or. App. 734 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2015

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … The state “agrees with defendant that the testimony was ‘scientific’ evidence and thus had to satisfy the standards articulated in State v. Brown, * * * and State v.

Wiley v. SAIF

337 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

See Krushwitz v. … See Norpac Foods, Inc. v.

Mallatt v. LUIHN

206 Or. 678 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1956

Parsons, 191 US 17 , 48 L ed 73, 24 S Ct 8 ; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 US 172, 175 , 44 L ed 119, 20 S Ct 77 ; Ex parte Reggel, 114 US 642, 651 , 29 L ed 250, 5 S Ct 1148 ; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 US 22, 31 , 25 L ed 989. … The Hurlbut case was approved and followed in Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare, 86 Cal App2d 627, 186 P2d 429 .

Putnam v. Kozer

119 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1926

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment order of the Circuit Court of Oregon for Marion County, commanding Sam A. … Section 26 provides that any person desiring to vote at a primary nominating election shall declare to the clerk of his election board his name, his residence, and political party.

Jackson County v. Roark

124 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Both parties rely on Brown v. Multnomah County, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), to reach different conclusions. … Brown v. Multnomah County, supra, 280 Or at 102 .

State v. Burke

109 Or. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 1991

Psychiatric Security Review Board, 65 Or. App. 259, 262 , 670 P.2d 1061 (1983) ( citing Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or. 95 , 570 P.2d 52 (1977). In Trop v. … Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or.

Teiser v. Swirsky

137 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1931

Before the meeting of the board of directors Swirsky had conferred with *608 Cohen upon more than one occasion. … J., Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

State v. Lyon

304 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1987

In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), we held that polygraph evidence is not admissible, over proper objection, in any civil or criminal trial in this state. … Cullin v. State, 565 P2d 445,457 (Wyo 1977). Accord Corbett v. State, supra. We noted in Brown that the leading case on stipulations for the admission of polygraph evidence is State v.

Mansker v. Astoria

100 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1921

See, also, McGough v. Lancaster Burial Board, L. R. 21 Q. B. Div. 323 (57 L. J. Q. B. (N. S.) 568, 36 Week. Rep. 822, 52 J. P. 740). 16, 17. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.

Wiley v. SAIF

337 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

See Krushwitz v. … See Norpac Foods, Inc. v.

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Revenue

321 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1995

For example, in this case, the Tax Court discounted an appraisal performed by taxpayer’s appraiser, Brown, in part, because Brown “was not aware of $6 million of functional obsolescence in the Boardman sale and admitted * … In this case, the Tax Court overruled its previous decision in Johnson v.

Johnson v. McGrew

137 Or. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 1995

In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … See State v. Norris-Romine/Finley, 134 Or App 204 , 894 P2d 1221 , rev den 321 Or 512 (1995).

State v. Reed

83 Or. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 417 . … See State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 417 and n 5. 4 In State v.

Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. Wasco County

210 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1957

Nottage v. City of Portland, 35 Or 539 , 58 P 883 ; Thomas v. City of Portland, 40 Or 50 , 66 P 439 ; and Brown v. City of Silverton, 97 Or 441 , 190 P 971 , affirm the rule of which we have just taken note. Watson v. … (See concurring opinion of Belt, J., in Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People’s Utility District v.

Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J

301 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1986

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986)(searches and seizures), State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983)(double jeopardy); Hewitt v. … Des Moines Community School Dist., 393 US 503 , 89 S Ct 733 , 21 L Ed 2d 731 (1969); James v. Board of Education of Central Dist.