Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

3.76s

  • State v. Colby

    756 A.2d 946 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 2000

    Board; transportation. Every prisoner gainfully employed is liable for the cost of board in the jail, as fixed by the county commissioners. … The sheriff shall charge the prisoner’s account, if there is one, for board. * * * * 5. Disbursements.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tuttle v. Lang

    100 Me. 123 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1905

    Fisher v. Deans, 107 Mass. 118 . Doggett v. Cook, 11 Cush. 262 . … Ex parte Gordon, 1 Black, 303 ; In re Webb, 89 Wis. 354 ; People v. Brown, 54 Mich. 15 ; State v. Vose, 80 Iowa, 467 ; People v. Barrett, 202 Ill. 287 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Wiswell v. Starr

    50 Me. 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862

    Brown, that the bill be dismissed as to him. But the truth of the facts upon which the motion is predicated, is not sustained by any testimony whatsoever. … Upon this point we are referred to Spurr v. Scovill & al., 3 Cush., 578, as conclusive.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Langdon v. Pickering

    19 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841

    This rule was received in the case of Bowes v. … This is the doctrine as established by the case of Brown v. Selwin, Cas. temp. Talbot, 240; and recognized in the case of Jackson v. Sill, 11 Johns. 201 ; where many of the previous cases are examined.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Katherine Stovall v. New England Telephone Company

    2025 ME 47 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2025

    See Boober v. Great N. Paper Co., 398 A.2d 371, 375 n.10 (Me. 1979); Bradbury v. … See Downing v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bradstreet v. Bradstreet

    64 Me. 204 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

    Higbee v. Bacon, 11 Pick., 423 ; Wood v. Stone, 39 N. H, 575; Patrick v. Cowles, 45 N. H., 553. The counsel for the appellant complain that certain issues presented by them were not submitted to the jury. … Holton v. Moses, 3 Barb.. 34; Varnum v. Taylor, 10 Bosworth, 148. A portion of the. appellant’s account is for personal services.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Richards v. Soucy

    610 A.2d 268 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1992

    See, e.g., Maddox v. Brown, 71 Me. 432 (1880); Scott v. Watson, 46 Me. 362 (1859). … In Conley v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Bernard v. Mead Publishing Paper Division

    765 A.2d 576 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001

    As we noted in Allen v. … The entry is: Decision of the Hearing Officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board vacated. Remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Maine Central Railroad v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n

    835 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 16, 1988

    Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 20 n. 20, 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 2851 n. 20, 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); Shaw v. … As the Court stated in Shaw : The Court's decision today in Franchise Tax Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Benson v. Inhabitants of Newfield

    136 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1938

    In applying the principle of presumption to the acts of a county superintendent of schools, the court, in Board of Education of City of Emporia et al. v. … In Clapp v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • The Pilot

    42 F.2d 290 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 12, 1930

    Ed.) 675, and note to same; section 330 and note; Smith Leading Cases, vol. 1, p. 164 (Ed. 1879); Calcutta Co. v. DeMattos, 32 L. J. Q. B. 322. … Hapgood v. Shaw, 105 Mass. 276 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joyce v. Town of Lyman

    565 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 11, 1989

    See Luce v. Hoefler, 464 A.2d 213, 215 (Me.1983). Cf. Macaro v. … Town of Windham, 468 A.2d 604, 606 (Me.1983) (Superior Court properly reversed poverty abatement denial where “the Board [considering the abatement petition] was compelled to conclude that the record demonstrated plaintiff

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Guertin v. City of Eastport

    143 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 8, 2001

    Plaintiff cites Garrett v. … If the property is within a municipality or county that has established a "board of assessment review,” then the taxpayer appeals to that board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Budge

    127 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1928

    Walton, 53 Ore., 557 ; Brown v. Com., 73 Pa., 321 ; Robertson v. State, 63 Tex. Crim. Rep., 216; State v. King, 24 Utah, 482 ; Jackson v. … Simmons, 78 Kan., 852 ; State v. *239 Hefferman, 24 S. D., 1; Wilson v. State, 175 Ind., 458, 465, 466 ; State v. Brown, 152 Ia., 427, 432, 436 ; State v. Gentry, 86 Kan., 534 ; People v. Bruno, 220 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Larson v. Allina Health Sys.

    350 F. Supp. 3d 780 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 2018

    Because Plaintiffs only invested in the core options, and not in the mutual fund window, Defendants argue Plaintiffs have failed to establish standing to bring their claims. ( Id. ) Defendants primarily rely on Brown v. … However, in this case, unlike in Brown , Plaintiffs claim to have suffered an injury.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Crabtree v. Washington County Railway Co.

    101 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1906

    regular train of the defendant the night of the twenty-second day of March aforesaid, and after the basket-ball game advertised, went with the other excursionists to the defendant’s station at Machias for the purpose of boarding … Prior to the enactment of the statute, the ticket did not necessarily bear evidence, upon its face, of all the terms of the contract, Burnham v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 63 Maine, 298. Crosby v. Maine Central R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • H. E. Willard

    52 F. 387 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 8, 1892

    The Orleans, 11 Pet. 175, 182 ; Grant v. Poillon, 20 How. 162 ; Ward v. Thompson, 22 How. 330 ; Kellum v. Emerson, 2 Curt. 79 ; The Larch, Id. 427; Davis v. Child, 2 Ware, (2d Ed.) 78, 82; Hall v. … Hudson, 2 Spr. 65 ; Hazard v. Howland, Id. 68, 71 ; The Marengo, 1 Low. 52, 56.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. Reed

    39 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

    Hamden v. Gordon & al., 2 Mason, 541 . … Gordon v. *418 Mass. F. & M. Ins. Co., 2 Pick. 249 ; Hall v. Frank. Ins. Co., 3 Pick. 466 ; The Sarah Ann, 3 Sum. 206 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robbins v. City of Auburn

    550 A.2d 362 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1988

    Jeffrey and Miriam Robbins appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County; Brodrick, J.) under M.R.Civ.P. 80B affirming the decision of the Auburn Board of Assessment Review. … Delta Chemicals v. Town of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anonymous

    1 F. Cas. 1008 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 2, 1857

    Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. (45 U. S.) 4. In Peck v. Jenness, 7 How. (48 U. … The Rio Grande v. Otis, 23 Wall. (90 U. S.) 458. [The principle of Taylor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.