Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
3.76s
756 A.2d 946 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 2000
Board; transportation. Every prisoner gainfully employed is liable for the cost of board in the jail, as fixed by the county commissioners. … The sheriff shall charge the prisoner’s account, if there is one, for board. * * * * 5. Disbursements.
Cited 0 timesPublished100 Me. 123 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1905
Fisher v. Deans, 107 Mass. 118 . Doggett v. Cook, 11 Cush. 262 . … Ex parte Gordon, 1 Black, 303 ; In re Webb, 89 Wis. 354 ; People v. Brown, 54 Mich. 15 ; State v. Vose, 80 Iowa, 467 ; People v. Barrett, 202 Ill. 287 .
Cited 21 timesPublished50 Me. 381 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862
Brown, that the bill be dismissed as to him. But the truth of the facts upon which the motion is predicated, is not sustained by any testimony whatsoever. … Upon this point we are referred to Spurr v. Scovill & al., 3 Cush., 578, as conclusive.
Cited 2 timesPublished19 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1841
This rule was received in the case of Bowes v. … This is the doctrine as established by the case of Brown v. Selwin, Cas. temp. Talbot, 240; and recognized in the case of Jackson v. Sill, 11 Johns. 201 ; where many of the previous cases are examined.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKatherine Stovall v. New England Telephone Company
2025 ME 47 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2025
See Boober v. Great N. Paper Co., 398 A.2d 371, 375 n.10 (Me. 1979); Bradbury v. … See Downing v.
Cited 0 timesPublished64 Me. 204 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874
Higbee v. Bacon, 11 Pick., 423 ; Wood v. Stone, 39 N. H, 575; Patrick v. Cowles, 45 N. H., 553. The counsel for the appellant complain that certain issues presented by them were not submitted to the jury. … Holton v. Moses, 3 Barb.. 34; Varnum v. Taylor, 10 Bosworth, 148. A portion of the. appellant’s account is for personal services.
Cited 2 timesPublished610 A.2d 268 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1992
See, e.g., Maddox v. Brown, 71 Me. 432 (1880); Scott v. Watson, 46 Me. 362 (1859). … In Conley v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedBernard v. Mead Publishing Paper Division
765 A.2d 576 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001
As we noted in Allen v. … The entry is: Decision of the Hearing Officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board vacated. Remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMaine Central Railroad v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n
835 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 16, 1988
Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 20 n. 20, 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 2851 n. 20, 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); Shaw v. … As the Court stated in Shaw : The Court's decision today in Franchise Tax Board v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBenson v. Inhabitants of Newfield
136 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1938
In applying the principle of presumption to the acts of a county superintendent of schools, the court, in Board of Education of City of Emporia et al. v. … In Clapp v.
Cited 14 timesPublished42 F.2d 290 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 12, 1930
Ed.) 675, and note to same; section 330 and note; Smith Leading Cases, vol. 1, p. 164 (Ed. 1879); Calcutta Co. v. DeMattos, 32 L. J. Q. B. 322. … Hapgood v. Shaw, 105 Mass. 276 .
Cited 0 timesPublished565 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 11, 1989
See Luce v. Hoefler, 464 A.2d 213, 215 (Me.1983). Cf. Macaro v. … Town of Windham, 468 A.2d 604, 606 (Me.1983) (Superior Court properly reversed poverty abatement denial where “the Board [considering the abatement petition] was compelled to conclude that the record demonstrated plaintiff
Cited 3 timesPublished143 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 8, 2001
Plaintiff cites Garrett v. … If the property is within a municipality or county that has established a "board of assessment review,” then the taxpayer appeals to that board.
Cited 2 timesPublished127 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1928
Walton, 53 Ore., 557 ; Brown v. Com., 73 Pa., 321 ; Robertson v. State, 63 Tex. Crim. Rep., 216; State v. King, 24 Utah, 482 ; Jackson v. … Simmons, 78 Kan., 852 ; State v. *239 Hefferman, 24 S. D., 1; Wilson v. State, 175 Ind., 458, 465, 466 ; State v. Brown, 152 Ia., 427, 432, 436 ; State v. Gentry, 86 Kan., 534 ; People v. Bruno, 220 N.
Cited 7 timesPublished350 F. Supp. 3d 780 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 2018
Because Plaintiffs only invested in the core options, and not in the mutual fund window, Defendants argue Plaintiffs have failed to establish standing to bring their claims. ( Id. ) Defendants primarily rely on Brown v. … However, in this case, unlike in Brown , Plaintiffs claim to have suffered an injury.
Cited 17 timesPublishedCrabtree v. Washington County Railway Co.
101 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1906
regular train of the defendant the night of the twenty-second day of March aforesaid, and after the basket-ball game advertised, went with the other excursionists to the defendant’s station at Machias for the purpose of boarding … Prior to the enactment of the statute, the ticket did not necessarily bear evidence, upon its face, of all the terms of the contract, Burnham v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 63 Maine, 298. Crosby v. Maine Central R.
Cited 0 timesPublished52 F. 387 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 8, 1892
The Orleans, 11 Pet. 175, 182 ; Grant v. Poillon, 20 How. 162 ; Ward v. Thompson, 22 How. 330 ; Kellum v. Emerson, 2 Curt. 79 ; The Larch, Id. 427; Davis v. Child, 2 Ware, (2d Ed.) 78, 82; Hall v. … Hudson, 2 Spr. 65 ; Hazard v. Howland, Id. 68, 71 ; The Marengo, 1 Low. 52, 56.
Cited 10 timesPublished39 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855
Hamden v. Gordon & al., 2 Mason, 541 . … Gordon v. *418 Mass. F. & M. Ins. Co., 2 Pick. 249 ; Hall v. Frank. Ins. Co., 3 Pick. 466 ; The Sarah Ann, 3 Sum. 206 .
Cited 1 timesPublished550 A.2d 362 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1988
Jeffrey and Miriam Robbins appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County; Brodrick, J.) under M.R.Civ.P. 80B affirming the decision of the Auburn Board of Assessment Review. … Delta Chemicals v. Town of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981).
Cited 0 timesPublished1 F. Cas. 1008 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 2, 1857
Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. (45 U. S.) 4. In Peck v. Jenness, 7 How. (48 U. … The Rio Grande v. Otis, 23 Wall. (90 U. S.) 458. [The principle of Taylor v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna