Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersWA

9,602 results

1.56s

  • Pacific Ins. Co. v. Catholic Bishop of Spokane

    450 F. Supp. 2d 1186 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Apr 24, 2006

    charitable immunity overturned. … Clearly, a covered person intentionally striking a golf ball with the intention that it land on its assigned fairway or green, but which sharply diverts from its intended course and strikes a player on an adjacent fairway

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Langadinos v. Washington State Bar Association

    District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 26, 2025

    1021, 1030 (9th Cir. 2023) (en banc)). 22 23 1 The WSBA qualifies … as an arm of the state, as Washington formally 2 established the WSBA “as a state agency by legislative enactment.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rainier Bancorporation v. Department of Revenue

    96 Wash. 2d 669 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1982

    Thirty-five years after the passage of RCW 82.04.430(1) this was clearly and *678 explicitly recognized by the Department. … By this court's own definition of what the term contemplates, the plaintiff does not qualify as a "financial business".

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gross v. Sunding

    161 P.3d 380 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 22, 2007

    The documentation provided by Gross clearly states "ABC Legal Services, Inc. is unable to serve the defendant(s)" as late as June 9, 2005. … Only one of the qualifying grounds is needed for denial. Pelton v. Tri-State Mem'l Hosp., 66 Wash.App. 350, 356 , 831 P.2d 1147 (1992).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Jimi James Hamilton, Appellant

    196 Wash. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 24, 2016

    Kolden was a person qualified to make the observations described in the chart note. … The State never established that Dr.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. King

    24 Wash. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 23, 1979

    For that reason, Norby is not, in our opinion, persuasive in this case where there clearly is no evidence of the effect of the drinking on defendant’s mental processes. … The decision to file an affidavit of prejudice is clearly a matter of strategy. Nothing in the record suggests that there was reason to ask for a change of judge.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Nickum v. City of Bainbridge Island

    223 P.3d 1172 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 8, 2009

    Non-SEPA Claims ¶ 18 "Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to obtaining a decision that qualifies as a decision reviewable under LUPA." Stanzel v. … Both Verizon and the City qualify as prevailing parties.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Lige Dickson Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California

    96 Wash. 2d 291 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1981

    Defendant had promised plaintiff that defendant would qualify and register in Washington as a dealer in franchises. … It should be pointed out that where there exists, in statute or in case law, clearly established means under which a contract dealing with a particular subject matter may be rendered enforceable notwithstanding the statute

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Diaz v. NAT. CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.

    17 P.3d 603 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2001

    Liability Insurance or Qualified Self Insurance An automobile liability policy or qualified self-insurance arrangement provides the Authorized Driver with the minimum limits required by the automobile financial responsibility … The only qualifier is that the renter must sign up for SLI at the time of contract, which Pulliam did.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Dillard

    15 Wash. 2d 35 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1942

    Dillard, who was named therein as executor thereof, qualified as such executor, and ever since has been acting as such; that Dr. … These statements, in the light of all the surrounding circumstances, clearly indicate that the uppermost thought in Dr.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • In Re The Parentage Of L.j.m.

    476 P.3d 636 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 24, 2020

    To establish standing, a petitioner must only allege sufficient facts to satisfy the statutory requirement. … Bergsieker’s petition clearly alleges that he has undertaken “full” parental responsibilities.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Karstetter v. King County Corr. Guild

    193 Wash. 2d 672 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2019

    Because we conclude that Karstetter alleged facts supporting whistle-blower protection under Diocomes, we do not opine on Karstetter's contention that his actions also qualify as performance of a public duty or obligation … Loomis Armored, Inc., 128 Wash.2d 931 , 941, 913 P.2d 377 (1996) (establishing the four elements a plaintiff must prove under the Perritt test).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Futurewise v. Reed

    161 Wash. 2d 407 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 7, 2007

    And any tax increase that is shielded from referendum by an emergency clause or by the failure to qualify a referendum for the ballot would require an “advisory” vote of the people. … Philadelphia II involved an initiative that sought to establish a federal initiative process, a matter clearly not subject to state legislation. Id. at 719-20.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Beard's Estate

    60 Wash. 2d 127 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1962

    The will was admitted to probate, the executors were appointed and qualified, and an inventory and appraisal were filed. … The language preceding the phrase clearly states it must appear to the court that the estate is fully solvent. This requires a court determination, which, in a court of record, must be entered in writing.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Craig

    52 Wash. 66 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1909

    That case is a long and somewhat abstruse attempt to qualify the general rule. … The danger of departure from established precedent is well stated by Justice Stone in a dissenting opinion in the Parsons case: “Judicial administration is too real to enter upon such doubtful-and dangerous speculations.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Marashi v. Lannen

    55 Wash. App. 820 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 26, 1989

    The Lannens claim the statement of business purpose in the borrower's certificate conclusively establishes the loan comes within the business exception. … In Brown , the court considered the borrower's oral representations to the broker, which did not clearly show that the purpose of the loan was personal, then considered statements contained in the loan documents themselves

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.

    146 Wash. 2d 146 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2002

    The customer clearly suffered injury; he had to be taken to the hospital for treatment and Gaglidari was summarily dismissed. … However, when Kohn sought to return from medical leave, she found her job had been eliminated, and she was not offered other available positions for which she may have been qualified.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Qualey v. Pierce County

    District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 26, 2025

    Plaintiff explains that the issues of fact 3 the Court found on the issue of qualified immunity would “be equally applicable” to the State 4 law claim for wrongful death. … The first, the Court’s dismissal of Pierce County 17 and Sheriff Troyer for failing to implement state mandated de-escalation policies, could have 18 easily been raised or more clearly briefed in Plaintiff’s response

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. Carter

    74 Wash. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 23, 1994

    As the Salvucci Court observed, the question of whether incriminating statements made in a suppression hearing may be used as impeachment is quite different from the one of whether 'use immunity’ extends only through the … Carter clearly was not an overnight guest, and her short-term presence in the room establishes nothing more than "legitimate presence”.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Yuri Prostov, App. v. Wa State Department Of Licensing, Res.

    Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 6, 2015

    Laurie Provoe's uncontested testimony established that a paper application to renew a driver's license is not required. … A qualified party shall be considered to have prevailed if the qualified party obtained relief on a significant issue that achieves some benefit that the qualified party sought. RCW 4.84.350(1).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.