Case law

Campbell v. City of Eugene

116 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1925

Leser v. Board of Registry, 139 Md. 46, 73 ( 114 Atl. 840 ).” Ib. (b): “A proposal to amend the state constitution is not legislation.” Warfield v. Vandiver, 101 Md. 78 ( 60 Atl. 538, 542, 543 , 4 Ann. Cas. 692). Ib. … Justice Brown in the ease of State ex rel. v.

State v. Hung Ngoc Truong

265 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 2014

He argues that that evidence is scientific evidence that should not have been admitted without the foundational showing of scientific validity required by State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … State v.

State v. Tovar

256 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2013

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). … State v.

Consolidated Ranches, Inc. v. Chase Land & Cattle Co.

242 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

Brown called the Mayfields while Eslinger was in Brown’s office, and both Eslinger and Brown informed them that they would receive the $25,000. … Company v. Oregon Automobile Ins. Company, 242 Or 407 , 408 P2d 198 (1965). Affirmed.

Dean v. Multnomah County

349 Or. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2026

When the board rests a determination on a medical opinion, our review requires that we assess whether the board properly considered that opinion in light of the entire record. See Guild v. … Because the board did not reconcile the apparent inconsistency 16 Dean v.

Petrusich v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

984 F. Supp. 2d 1112 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2013

In Fleet v. … Grant is "Board Certified in Adult Psychiatry and in Child & Adolescent Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology.” AR at 366.

State v. Henley

363 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2018

E.g. , State v. … See also State v.

State v. Maxwell

213 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2007

On appeal, citing State v. … See, e.g., State v.

Major Creek Lum. Co. v. Johnson

99 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1921

The board of trustees transacted their business in a dwelling-house, or some such place. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 92 Ala. 145 ( 9 South. 136 ), the head-note reads: “A contract for the purchase of goods, made between a citizen of Alabama and a Missouri corporation, whether made in Alabama or Missouri, is within

State v. Burke

126 Or. 651 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1928

BROWN, J. Section 187, Chapter 207, General Laws of Oregon, 1925, codified as Or. … Hardin, 63 Or. 305 ( 127 Pac. 789 ); State v. Hill, 63 Or. 451 ( 128 Pac. 444 ); State v. Russell, 64 Or. 247 ( 129 Pac. 1051 ); State v. McPherson, 69 Or. 381 ( 138 Pac. 1076 ); State v.

Jackson County v. Roark

124 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Both parties rely on Brown v. Multnomah County, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), to reach different conclusions. … Brown v. Multnomah County, supra, 280 Or at 102 .

Russell v. Ford Motor Co.

281 Or. 587 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978

White Motor Corp., 260 Or 251 , 490 P2d 184 (1971), 4 and in *593 the home, Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co., 262 Or 293 , 498 P2d 766 (1972). Finally, Brown v. … See Brown v. Western Farmers Association, supra, 268 Or at 476-478 .

State v. Whitmore

257 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 2013

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). The state argues that no such foundation was required in this case and that, regardless, any error was harmless. … See State v.

Rossi v. United States

755 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 29, 1990

Plaintiffs cite to United States v. Buford, 889 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir.1989), for support. … Plaintiffs next move to strike Browning’s declaration because of Browning’s failure to include in his declaration a delegation order, a statement of Browning’s authority.

Williams v. Gratton

136 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1931

*226 BROWN, J. In support of his petition for attorney fees, Mr. Seabrook testified: “Q. … There must be an agreement, express or implied, for compensation. ’ ’ As we stated in the Faling Case, the case of Forman v. Sewerage & Water Board, 119 La. 49 ( 43 So. 908 , 12 Ann.

Peabody v. SAIF

326 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2023

The board adhered to its decision. Claimant petitioned for judicial review, challenging the board’s decision to award $12,500 in attorney fees, rather than the $31,000 claimant had requested. Peabody v. … See Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac.

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Whited

239 Or. 149 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1964

The party asserting unconstitutionality labors under a heavy burden of proof: Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, supra; Schmidt v. City of Cornelius, 1957, 211 Or 505 , 316 P2d 511 ; Port of Umatilla v. … Richardson, 1906, 48 Or 309 , 85 P 225 , and may be entirely prohibited: Brown and Bennett v. Powers, 1910, 146 Iowa 729 , 125 NW 833 : Twenty-first Amendment.

Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.

133 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1929

*475 BROWN, J. … A. 585; Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11, 18 , 116 N. E. 684 , Ann. Cas. 1918B 764, 14 N. C. C. A. 125.)” To the same effect, see Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co., 108 Kan. 320 ( 195 P. 863 , 19 A. L.

Hernandez-Zurita v. State

290 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 2018

Brown v. Baldwin , 131 Or. App. 356 , 361, 885 P.2d 707 (1994), rev. den. , 320 Or. 507 , 888 P.2d 568 (1995). … Id. at 361 , 885 P.2d 707 (emphasis in Brown ).

State v. Almahmood

308 Or. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 27, 2021

State v. … State v. Brown, 293 Or App 772, 779, 427 P3d 221 (2018).