Case law

United States v. McMillian

898 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 18, 2006

(citing Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 217 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979)). As the Supreme Court said in Brown v. … Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 8 . In the Lesane murder case, Judge Bowers had ruled that "any statements [Mr. McMilli-an] made are suppressed, under Brown v.

American Federation Of Television And Radio Artists v. National Labor Relations Board

462 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1972

The Board, with one member dissenting, adopted the examiner's decision. … See Federal Land Bank v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 99-100 , 62 S.Ct. 1 , 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941); Argosy Limited v. Hennigan, 404 F.2d 14, 20 (5th Cir. 1968); United States v.

Teamsters Local Union No. 175 v. National Labor Relations Board

788 F.2d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1986

American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. NLRB, 395 F.2d 622 (D.C.Cir.1968). . American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. NLRB, 395 F.2d at 628. . … See District 65, Distributive Workers of America v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 1155 , 1164 (D.C.Cir.1978); Dallas General Drivers, Local No. 745 v. NLRB, 355 F.2d 842 , 844-45 (D.C.Cir.1966). .

Ladson v. Board of Education of District of Columbia Government

615 F.2d 1369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1980

615 F.2d 1369 199 U.S.App.D.C. 10 Ladson v. Board of Education of District of Columbia Government No. 79-1521 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/4/80 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Board of Trade Clearing Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

593 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1979

593 F.2d 1370 193 U.S.App.D.C. 216 Board of Trade Clearing Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission No. 78-1263 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 3/29/79 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Troy Grove v. NLRB

140 F.4th 506 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 2025

The Board, with the Supreme Court’s approval, has recognized that the “use of impasse” is a legitimate “bargaining tactic.” Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231, 239 (1996). … Because the parties were at an “impasse,” we do not reach the issue. 9 See, e.g., Brown, 518 U.S. at 246; Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. NLRB, 86 F.4th 909, 917 (D.C. Cir. 2023); Laurel Bay Health & Rehab. Ctr. v.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

337 A.2d 495 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1975

HARRIS, Associate Judge: Petitioner challenges the issuance by the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) of a certificate of oc *496 cupancy to intervenors for the operation of a restaurant and carry-out, … D.C.Code 1973, § 5-420 states: “The Board of Adjustment shall not have the power to amend any regulation or map.”

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

410 A.2d 197 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1979

Citizens Association of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 288 A.2d 666 (1972). … We view the record as containing substantial evidence (Record at 108-09), from which the Board could make the finding it did. Sophia’s Inc. v. D.C.A.B.C. Bd., D.C.App., 268 A.2d 799, 801 (1970). 4 .

Trinity Services Group, Inc. v. NLRB

998 F.3d 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 2021

We review the Board’s factual findings for substantial evidence. See Davidson Hotel Co. v. NLRB, 977 F.3d 1289, 1292 (D.C. … Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 (2008). Unless the employer threatens “reprisal or force” or promises “benefit[s],” such expressions “cannot be used as evidence of an unfair labor practice.” Sasol N. Am. Inc. v.

Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

551 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1977

See Brief for Respondent Board of Governors at 46 n. 17, National Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 516 F.2d 1229 (1975). … Agents v. Board of Governors, supra, 160 U.S.App.D.C. at 145-146 , 489 F.2d at 1270-71 . See also Alabama Ass’n of Ins. Agents v.

Office Employees International Union, Local No. 11 v. National Labor Relations Board

235 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1956

For example, in National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const. … National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, 18 , 63 S.Ct. 394 , 87 L.Ed. 579 (1943); National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mcclatchy Newspapers, Inc.

964 F.2d 1153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1992

Case Co. v. … But the Board is comparing apples and oranges. In none of the cases the Board cites did the employer attempt to bargain about the change before enacting it. See NLRB v.

Bois v. Marsh

801 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1986

To the contrary, it appears that the Board’s decision may “obviate the need for judicial intervention.” Schlesinger v. … This case presents us with the dilemma and opportunity of choosing which path to follow. *260 In Brown v.

McCormick v. District of Columbia

752 F.3d 980 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2014

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569–70 (1972). At first reading, the record does not support a conclusion that the District of Columbia deprived appellant of a legally protected interest. … And the Eighth Circuit found adequate a hearing where a dismissed school supervisor was given unlimited time to speak before the school board and have his attorney speak on his behalf. Hammer v.

Garvey v. National Transportation Safety Board

190 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1999

Martin v. … It is also the position the FAA has consistently taken in litigation before the Board. See Administrator v. Gentile, 6 N.T.S.B. 60 , 64 (1988); Administrator v. Wells, 1 N.T.S.B. 1472 , 1474 (1971).

Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

117 F.3d 1454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997

Skyline Distribs. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 403, 411 (D.C.Cir.1996). In NLRB v. … But see NLRB v.

Committee for Washington's Riverfront Parks v. Thompson

451 A.2d 1177 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1982

In Brown v. … In Brown v.

International Molders & Allied Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

410 F.2d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1969

B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 , 82 S.Ct. 1099 , 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962); N. L. R. B. v. Phaostron Instrument & Electronic Co., 9 Cir., 344 F.2d 855 (1965). … Accordingly, we hold in abeyance our determination of this issue. 4 Otherwise the Board’s order will be enforced without awaiting that determination. So ordered. . Tyler Pipe & Foundry Co. v.

Peter J. Petkas v. Elmer B. Staats, Chairman, Cost Accounting Standards Board

501 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 1974

DAVIES, Senior District Judge: This appeal attacks the holding 1 of the District Court that the Cost Accounting Standards Board (Board) need not reveal to the appellant the Disclosure Statements filed with the Board by Lockheed … Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 425 F.2d 578, 582 (1970). We have made it clear, however, that the test for confidentiality is an objective one. Bristol-Myers Co. v.

Marjam Supply Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

213 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 2007

Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947). … ., Inc. v.