Case law

Brown v. Corson

16 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1888

plaintiffs, “and their legal representatives forever, that said real estate is free from all *389 encumbrances, and that we will, and our heirs, executors, and administrators shall warrant and defend the same to the said Hiram Brown … In Corson’s contest with the railroad company, he decided it was publio land where the railroad company attached, and in the contest of the Railroad Company v.

Brown v. Haun

328 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1999

De Young v. Brown

368 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 2021

Brown BALMER, J. This case concerns attorney fees awarded by the Court of Appeals following its decision in De Young v. Brown, 297 Or App 355, 443 P3d 642 (2019) (De Young I). … De Young v. Brown, 300 Or App 530, 532, 451 P3d 651 (2019) (De Young II). The Court of Appeals explained that “[t]he inherent equitable power to award attorney fees was first recognized in Oregon in Gilbert [v.

Brown v. Ruhl

78 Or. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1986

Tracy v. Employment Division, 29 Or App 851 , 565 P2d 403 (1977). … In an earlier opinion, Star Rentals v.

State v. Brown

115 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1992

Galvin v. Brown & McCabe

53 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1909

In Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 315 ( 33 Pac. 557 ), the plaintiff was employed in piling ties in a box car. … Parsons v. Winchell, 59 Mass. 592 ( 52 Am. Dec. 745 ); Mulchey v. Religious Society, 125 Mass. 487 ; Page v. Parker, 40 N. H. 47. In Warax v. Ry. Co. (C.

Department of Human Services v. S. M. S.

281 Or. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2016

Oregon School Activities v. Board of Education, 244 Or App 506, 510 , 260 P3d 735 (2011); see also Dept. of Human Services v. L. … Dept. v. L.

Brown v. Kotek

Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2024

Specifically, Article V, section 14, of the Oregon Constitution provides, in part: 266 Brown v. … authority to impose conditions without a commutee’s consent. 268 Brown v.

Brown v. EBI Companies

289 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

We hold only that a finding of "good cause” was not foreclosed by our decision in Sekermestrovich v. SAIF, as the Board appears to have thought. … It is therefore necessary to return this case to the Board. Reversed and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Brown v. Intrustment Nw., Inc. (In re Estate of Kilpatrick-Brown)

297 Or. App. 192 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2019

Brown v. EBI Companies

289 Or. 905 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1980

PER CURIAM In Brown v. … If the claimant "prevails finally in a hearing before the referee or in a review by the board itself,” ORS 656.386, supra, directs the referee or board to allow a reasonable attorney fee.

Brown v. Employment Division

22 Or. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1975

The issue in this case is the same as in Evjen v. … See, Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 4 Or App 178 , 471 P2d 831 , 476 P2d 931 (1970), Sup Ct review denied (1971). It follows that there is evidence in the record supporting the • rder of the Board. Affirmed.

State v. Brown

13 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1973

State v. Brown

252 Or. 568 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

The smaller man observed in the burglary had brown hair, as did defendant. No fingerprints were found at the place of the burglary but cloth imprints were observed. Cotton gloves were found in the vehicle.

Elfstrom v. Brown

229 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

Brown (party of the second part). … The agreement entered into between plaintiffs and Don A Brown on March 16, 1946, under which the latter was to conduct *602 the glazing business, provided that Brown “does hereby accept a franchise for the purpose of operating

Goldsmith v. Brown

5 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

State v. Brown

46 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 1980

ORS 487.805(2); State v. Creson, 33 Or App 369 , 576 P2d 814 (1978). … The officer’s explanation went beyond that required by State v. Baxter, supra, and was a sufficient answer to the inquiry. Reversed and remanded. This holding expressly narrowed our prior holding in State v.

Brown v. Alt

49 Or. App. 848 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1980

Simon v. Brown

5 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown, the defendant. Then follows a prayer for a writ of mandamus commanding the Treasurer to reduce said currency in the General Fund to coin, and to pay said warrant, with the interest due thereon. … (Griswold v. National Insurance Co., 3 Cowen, 96.)

Spalding v. Brown

32 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1897

weight of it with any greater degree of certainty than did the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses, noted their manner, tone and bearing while on the stand, and having reached the conclusion that King loaned to Brown