Case law

Moores v. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CORP. OF MAINE

255 A.2d 892 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 25, 1969

Bernier v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants Inc. (Me.), 250 A.2d 820 , “It may be slender but it must be evidence, not speculation, surmise, or conjecture.” Taylor’s case, 127 Me. 207, 208 , 142 A. 730 ; Tiko v. … Patrick v. J. B. Ham Co., 119 Me. 510 , 111 A. 912 , 13 A.L.R. 427 ; Brown’s case, 123 Me. 424 , 123 A. 421 , 60 A.L.R. 1293 .

Coombs v. Town of Ogunquit

578 F. Supp. 1321 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 26, 1984

Compare Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Bangor, 381 A.2d 643 (Me.1978) with Cardinali v. Planning Board of Lebanon, 373 A.2d 251 (Me.1977); see also Littlefield v. … Railroad Commission of Texas v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

728 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1990

The Great Northern Board may redeem the *808 rights for one cent each at any time prior to the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of Great Northern’s outstanding common stock. … See, e.g., Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries Inc., 644 F.Supp. 1229 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (construing New Jersey Corporation Act); Asarco Inc. v.

Tucker v. Andrews

13 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1836

Bowes v. Strathmore, 2 Bro. Ch. R. 345; Jones v. Martin, 5 Vesey, 266, note; Fortescue v. Hannah, 19 Vesey, 66; 1 Story’s Com. on Equity, 271. … Brown, trustee of the wife, who is required to give bond to the Judge of Probate for the county of Oxford, with sufficient surety or sureties, in the penal sum of twelve hundred dollars, conditioned for the faithful performance

State v. Shaw

64 Me. 263 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

State v. Williams, 25 Maine, 561; Fossett v. Bearce, 29 Maine, 523; Bearce v. Fossett, 34 Maine, 575; Brown v. Witham, 51 Maine, 29.

Tappan v. Deblois

45 Me. 122 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

Browne v. Yeall, 7 Ves., Jr., 50, note 5. … Washburn v. Sewall, 9 Met. 280 ; Sohier v. St. Paul’s Church, 12 Met. 250 ; Brown v. Kelsey, 2 Cush. 243 ; Groton v. Ruggles, 17 Maine, 137; Beaty v. Kurtz, 2 Pet. 583 ; Burr v. Smith, 7 Vermont, 210; Whitman v.

Allen v. Allen

629 A.2d 1228 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 1993

Greenstreet v. Brown, 623 A.2d 1270, 1272-73 (Me.1993). A review of the record discloses that Claude testified he began missing child support payments in 1975. … Carter v. Carter, 611 A.2d 86, 87 (Me.1992) (quoting Britton v. Britton, 100 N.M. 424 , 671 P.2d 1135, 1139 (1983)). “Each payment [due pursuant to an order of support] becomes a judgment debt as of the due date.” Id.

Lynch v. South Congregational Parish

109 Me. 32 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 1912

Merrill v. Hayden, 86 Maine, 134; Jackson v. Phillips, 14 Allen, 539 ; Fish v. Atty. Gen’l, L. R. 4 Eq., 521. … It was a boarding as well as a day school. Its Board of Trustees and management, some of them clergymen, were affiliated with the Congregational denomination in this State.

Potter, Prescott, Jamieson & Nelson, P.A. v. Campbell

708 A.2d 283 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1998

Cole, 637 A.2d 463, 465 (Me.1994) (quoting *286 Hall v. Board of Envtl. … Supp.1981); see also Dutil v.

Clark v. American Cyanamid Co.

82 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 21, 1949

The applicability of the principle established in Morgan v. … As I view it, the defendant’s attempt to use Morgan v.

Globe Air, Inc. v. Thurston

438 A.2d 884 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1981

See City and County of Denver v. Lewin, 106 Colo. 331, 105 P.2d 854 (1940); Wagner v. North Dakota Board of Barber Examiners, 186 N.W.2d 570 (N.D.1971); Public Employment Relations Board v. … Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc., Me., 217 A.2d 217 (1966). The rule has been extended to judicial review of administrative action. See Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals for City of Bangor, Me., 398 A.2d 419 (1979).

Giles v. Eaton

54 Me. 186 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Thompson v. Hatch, 3 Pick., 512 ; Tripp v. Brown ell, 2 Gray, 402 . *189 The death of Eaton was a revocation of the power of his solicitor, who thereupon ceased to have authority to act in his behalf.

Inhabitants of Greenville v. Beauto

99 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 1904

S., c. 18, § 51, to recover for board, nursing and medical attendance furnished the defendant while sick with small pox in the plaintiff town. … It is evident that so far as existing financial ability at that time is concerned, he was not “able” within the meaning of the statute, for, as was held in Orono v.

Carson v. Town of Oakland

442 A.2d 170 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1982

Thus, he was not able to make a proper verification of any need and the Board finds his decision was within the guidelines. … Michaud v.

Webber v. Wright

124 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1924

Braman, 105 Maine, 494; Sunderland v. Jackson, 32 Maine, 80; Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 309, 314; 9 R. C. L., 766, 767; Franklin Ins. Co. v. Cousens, 127 Mass., 258, 261 ; Durkin v. Cobleigh, 156 Mass., 108 . … Pillsbury v. Moore, 44 Maine, 154; Holmes v. Corthell, 80 Maine, 31; Staples v. Dickson, 88 Maine, 362. Exceptions overruled.

Thompson v. Mitchell

35 Me. 281 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

Brown v. Vawser, 4 East, 684; Henfree v. Bromley, 6 East, 309; Irvine v. Elnon, 8 East, 64; Oliver v. Collings, 11 East, 367; Woodbury v. Northy, 3 Greenl. 85; Aldrich v. Jessiman, 8 N. H. 516. … Parsons v. Aldrich, 6 N. H. 284; Nichols v. Renssellaer In. Co. 22 Wend. 125 . The amount for which execution should issue, will be determined on a hearing in equity. Defendant defaulted.

Neal v. Flint

88 Me. 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1895

Bonney v. Morrill, 57 Maine, 368, 373, and cases cited. See Grant v. Frost, 80 Maine, 202; Bradstreet v. Rich, 72 Maine, 233, 237, and cases cited. Brown on Parol Evidence, ch. xii, § 50, and cases cited. … Hulbert, 117 Mass. 151 ; Nickerson v. Saunders, 36 Maine, 413; Goodspeed v. Fuller, 46 Maine, 144; Bradstreet v. Rich, supra. In Dorr v.

State v. Johnson

982 A.2d 320 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 8, 2009

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 406 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Malloy v. … See State v. Brown, 321 A.2d 478, 485 (Me.1974); State v. Langley, 242 A.2d 688, 690-91 (Me.1968).

Simpson v. Garland

72 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 18, 1881

In Nobleboro' v. … Sturdivant v. Hull, 59 Maine, 172; Atkins v. Brown, 59 Maine, 90; Sheridan v. Carpenter, 61 Maine, 83; Winship v. Smith, 61 Maine, 121; Ballou v. Talbot, 16 Mass. 461 ; Tucker Man’f’g Co. v.

Blackington v. City of Rockland

66 Me. 332 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 1877

subsequently reported thereon, and that the report was also acted upon in concurrence by the two boards. … In Slatterie v.