Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersLA

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc.

    273 So. 3d 517 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 8, 2019

    Moreover, before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [factfinder,] the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award. … In Louisiana, it is a well-established rule that, "[b]efore a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [fact finder], the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cherrington v. Gardner

    541 So. 2d 410 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1989

    DECREED that the provisions of this Judgment with respect to Adam Richard Gardner shall be applicable to Christopher John Gardner as long as Carmen Ann Cherrington fully cooperates with sending Christopher John Gardner to a qualified … The language in the Consent Judgment does not clearly show the parties' intention to settle the dispute which was on appeal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. MacK

    978 So. 2d 1258 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2008

    all persons causing or contributing to the injury, death, or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person's insolvency, ability to pay, immunity … Clearly, the trial court properly applied comparative fault principles to this matter, as both Ms. Mack and Ms.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Caddo Parish

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 1, 2021

    Qualified immunity protects the Law Enforcement Defendants so long as their individual conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would … When a defense of qualified immunity is asserted by the defendant, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving such immunity is inapplicable to the defendant’s conduct. See Waganfeald v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hisaw v. Unisys Corp.

    134 F.R.D. 151 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 18, 1991

    Beyond this refrain defendant has failed to establish through any evidence or information precise facts which exist to support the claim of attorney work-product protection. … As for the disclosure of the names of the persons with whom the deponents spoke in preparation for the deposition, the names of these persons are clearly discoverable under F.R.C.P. 26.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McKeithen Ex Rel. McKeithen v. the M/T Frosta

    435 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jun 29, 1977

    She has qualified as administratrix of his succession. … Such a result would be contrary to the established principles of admiralty. Spiller, supra, 466 F.2d at 909.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Judson v. Connolly

    5 La. 400 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1850

    The qualify which the others assumed, in the suit which they instituted against the present defendant, rendered them liable as heirs pure and simple. … We have uniformly held, that a prescription established by art. 1982 of the Civil Code, does not apply to cases of simulation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garrett v. Aby

    47 La. Ann. 618 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1895

    We have only to recall the language of the proviso of the Act of 1884 to clearly demonstrate the error of the foregoing supposition. … This case does not, in our conception, involve in any manner the liberties or immunities of citizens.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Wilcox v. Max Welders, L.L.C.

    969 F. Supp. 2d 668 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 28, 2013

    If that were not the case, Chandris in fact would have established a voyage test. … In summary, Wilcox has not shown that he qualifies as a Jones Act seaman.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Coleman

    406 So. 2d 563 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 16, 1981

    Competency of expert witnesses is a question of fact within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his rulings on qualifications of experts will not be disturbed unless clearly wrong. State v. … A. drug school and has qualified as an expert in every section of Criminal District Court in New Orleans, in Baton Rouge, in Jefferson Parish and in federal court.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Beaumont v. Exxon Corp.

    868 So. 2d 976 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 2004

    First we must determine if there exists a reasonable factual basis in the record for the jury's finding and, secondly, whether the record establishes that the jury's finding is not clearly wrong. Walden v. … word `substantial' thus clearly precludes impairments that interfere in only a minor way ..."

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McDaniels v. Miller

    136 So. 2d 763 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1961

    In reconvention defendant alternatively prayed that the court establish the boundary between the litigants after a survey by a qualified surveyor appointed by the court. … From the record before us it clearly appears the procedure followed by Tycer failed to comply with the clear and express provisions of our Revised Civil Code regulating the establishment of boundaries.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hibernia Community Development Corp. v. U.S.E. Community Services Group, Inc.

    166 F. Supp. 2d 511 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 13, 2001

    Under the agreement, Hibernia would loan qualified applicants up to $20,000.00 for home repairs. … Qualified homeowners were also eligible for up to $25,000.00 in grant money from the Federal Government through the HOME Program.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brou v. Martin

    2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 1465 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 2008

    that the fact finder is clearly wrong. … R.S. 13:1880 A(l) and that Martin is qualified to run for the Office of Marshal, Ward II, City Court, Denham Springs, Louisiana.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury

    7 La.App. 3 Cir. 225 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 2007

    This statute has been described as a tripartite prescription provision: A straightforward reading of this statute clearly demonstrates the statute sets forth two prescriptive limits within which to bring a medical malpractice … provides that "[a]ll malpractice claims against the state, its agencies, or other persons covered by this Part, other than claims wherein the patients are prisoners . . . shall be reviewed by a state medical review panel established

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • C.M.J. v. L.M.C., Wife of C.M.J.

    156 So. 3d 16 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 15, 2014

    money to live, which was not based on fact, as was established at trial hereof. … Her interview was not a “forensic interview,” and although she testified she uses interviewing techniques that “come from forensic interviewing,” the evidence established her interviews with all of the children clearly do

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Champion Ins. Co.

    590 So. 2d 736 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1991

    The association shall perform its functions under a plan of operation established and approved under R.S. 22:1383 and shall exercise its powers *740 through a board of directors established under R.S. 22:1381." … Also, under La.R.S. 22:1391, LIGA has immunity for any action taken by it regarding its powers and duties.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • LeBlanc v. Barry

    771 So. 2d 696 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2000

    This fund is established and regulated as a special fund for the benefit of successful malpractice claimants. … The statute and jurisprudence clearly contemplate that the PCF has an interest in the appellate process. See R.S. 40:1299.44(C)(6).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • J. Manoco, Inc. v. State, Louisiana Gaming Control Board

    98 La.App. 1 Cir. 1412 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1999

    Lucky's was no longer a qualified truck stop as defined in La. R.S. 27:306 A, is subject to the manifest error/clearly wrong standard. See Carver, Inc. v. … However, the record clearly establishes that counsel for Mr. Lucky's was in attendance and participated in the appeal before the Board. Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Louisiana State Board of Optometry Examiners v. Pearle Optical of Alexandria, Inc.

    177 So. 2d 164 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1965

    That new corporation, of course, is one of the defendants in this suit, and, as we have already pointed out, it clearly is an alter ego of Pearle Optical, Inc. … We believe that such an advertisement not only relates to price, but that it also constitutes “bait advertising,” in that such an offer clearly is made and published to induce the public to patronize that establishment solely

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.