Case law

Aitken v. Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Commission

136 N.J.L. 372 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 1948

It seems to us that the fact finding bjr the Board of Review of the Unemployment Compensation Commission was proper. … Clearly, they were not entitled to their compensation and the judgment of the Board of Review will be affirmed.

Ball v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Retirement Fund

71 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

The amended section provided that the decision of the board of trustees upon any application for such annuity should conclusively determine the right of the applicant thereto. … The plea demurred to, after setting out the provisions of the act of 1899 above referred to, avers that the board has not decided upon the plaintiff’s application, which is still pending before the board and undetermined.

Ciecwisz v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

113 N.J. 180 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 27, 1988

This case is controlled by our decision in the companion case of Maynard v. … We disagree. *182 As in Maynard , we conclude that a slip-and-fall accident does not entail “a great rush of force or uncontrollable power,” Kane v.

Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of Wall

127 N.J. 152 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 1992

In Medici v. … See Rowatti v. Gonchar, 101 N.J. 46, 51-52 , 500 A.2d 381 (1985); Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 296 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965); Ward v. Scott, 16 N.J. 16, 23 , 105 A.2d 851 (1954).

Township of Berkeley Heights v. Board of Adjustment

144 N.J. Super. 291 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1976

Verona Corp. v. West Caldwell Mayor and Council, 49 N. J. 274, 284 (1967). … See Van Ness v. Deal, supra.

Board of Education v. New Jersey Education Ass'n

96 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1967

The board is a public agency and therefore its employees do not have collective bargaining rights. In Delaware River and Bay Authority v. International Organization, etc., 15 N. … Trainmen v.

Harman v. Board of Pharmacy

67 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 6, 1901

violate any of the provisions of this act shall forfeit and pay for each and every offence the sum of one hundred dollars (together with costs) as a penalty therefor; to be sued for and recovered by and in the name of the ‘board … Cary v. Forsyth, Pen. *432; Meirs v. Bussom, 28 Vroom 383 . The conviction is set aside, with costs.

State v. Board of Education

63 N.J.L. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

This certiorari brings up a resolution of the board of education of Raritan township, in the county of Middlesex, authorizing the removal of a school-house from one site to another. … The differing opinions *202 read in the eases of Avon v. Neptune City, 28 Vroom 701 , and West Jersey Traction Co. v.

BROWN v. WARREN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 15, 2023

.”); Fowler v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Mount Laurel Twp., No. 13-6455, 2016 WL 5334657, at *8 (D.N.J.

Board of Trustees v. City of Union City

112 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1970

Plaintiffs are the board of trustees of the Free Public Library and two members of the board under subpoena. … Eggers v. Kenny, supra, 15 N. J. at 125. It must also be noted that the powers of the board of commissioners of Union City are not limited to the legislative function.

Jones v. Middlesex County Board of Elections

259 F. Supp. 931 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 13, 1966

Hancock v. … The board or body which governs the local housing project is composed of citizens of the municipality appointed by the presiding officer of the municipal governing body.

BROWN v. WARREN

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 17, 2023

Peskin v. Peskin, 638 A.2d 849, 856 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994) (citing Nolan v. Lee Ho, 577 A.2d 143, 146 (N.J. 1990)). … U.S. v. Lightman, 988 F. Supp. 448, 458 (D.N.J. 1997) (citing Weichert Co. Realtors v. Ryan, 608 A.2d 280, 284 (1992)).

Burlington County College Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

64 N.J. 10 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1973

In West Hartford Education Association v. … Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. International Org., etc., 45 N. J. 138, 148 (1965); Board of Ed., Borough of Union Beach v. N. J. E. A., et al., 53 N. J. 29, 46 (1968); Lullo v Intern.

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors

79 N.J.L. 604 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1910

French v. New Jersey School Board Ass'n Insurance Group

149 N.J. 478 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1997

Plaintiff then sought benefits under the UIM coverage contained in the insurance policy issued to Hudson by the New Jersey School Board Insurance Group. … Brown v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 163 Am. 323, 326, 788 P.2d 56 (1989).

Forgerson v. Board of Health

64 N.J.L. 484 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1900

The title defines the scope of the enactment (Allen v. Township of Bernards, 28 Vroom 303 ), and therefore every prohibition contained in the enactment must be limited to this expressed purpose of the legislature.

BROWN v. QUINN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 27, 2022

Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210 (3d Cir. 2009) (quoting Phillips v. County of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 233 (3d Cir. 2008)). … Alexander v. Fletcher, 367 F. App’x 289, 290 n. 2 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 389–90 (2007)); Woodyard v. Cnty. of Essex, 514 F. App’x 177, 184 (3d Cir. 2013); Clark v.

BROWN v. SMITH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 5, 2023

Brown v. Warren, 20-7907 (“Class Action”). … Consent Order, Brown v. Warren, No. 20-7907 (D.N.J.

Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of Elizabeth(074974)

224 N.J. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 2016

Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth (A-28-14) (074974) Argued October 27, 2015 -- Decided January 27, 2016 CUFF, P.J.A.D. … Programs v.

City of Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

28 N.J. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1958

This is the principle by which equality of treatment and burden is had, City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. J. 371 (1955); Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. R. Co. v. Neeld, 23 N. … This reasoning overlooks the canon of interpretation, Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. Hudson County Tax Board, 87 N. J.