Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.26s
Tri-County Youth Programs, Inc. v. Acting Deputy Director of the Division of Employment & Training
54 Mass. App. Ct. 405 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 9, 2002
Brown, 400 Mass. 826 , 828 & n.4 (1987); Commonwealth v. Oakes, 407 Mass. 92 , 94 n.4 (1990); Catlin v. Board of Registration of Architects, 414 Mass. 1 , 7 n.7 (1992); Foley v. … Gonsalves v. Commonwealth, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 606, 609 (1989). See Brown v. Leighton, 385 Mass. 757, 760 (1982). More generally, in 1973, the Legislature amended the comparative negligence statute, G.
Cited 14 timesPublishedKAREN BOUTET, TERRA FRIEDRICHS, AND JEREMY SYMONDS v. ACTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN
Massachusetts Superior Court · Mar 13, 2020
District v. … Ct. 715, 718 (2003), quoting from Pearson v. Board of Selectmen of Longmeadow, 49 Mass. App. Ct. 119, 125 (2000). See also Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks, Lodge No. 65 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRoma, III, Ltd. v. Board of Appeals of Rockport
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 8, 2018
See also Board of Appeals of Hanover v. … See Chadwick v. Board of Registration in Dentistry, 461 Mass. 77, 84 (2011).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmyth v. Visitors of the Theological Institution in Phillips Academy in Andover
154 Mass. 551 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 28, 1891
The King v. Bishop of Ely, 1 Wm. Bl. 71, 82. Eden v. Foster, 2 P. Wms. 325. … Philips v. Bury, 2 T. R. 346 ; S. C. 1 Ld. Raym. 5. The King v. Bishop of Ely, 2 T. R. 290. Attorney General v. Dixie, 13 Ves. 519. Attorney General v. Earl of Clar endon, 17 Ves. 491.
Cited 7 timesPublished238 Mass. 46 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 4, 1921
See John Stewart & Son, Ltd. v. Longhurst, [1917] A. C. 249; Charles R. Davidson & Co. v. M’Robb, [1918] A. C. 304, 331. In Fox v. Rees & Kirby, 115 L. T. Rep. (N. … As was said in Brown’s Case, 228 Mass. 31, 38 , “When copies of the decision of the board and all papers in connection therewith have been transmitted to the Superior Court, it is the duty of that court to take such action
Cited 30 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 18, 2018
No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 473 Mass. 297 , 314 (2015). … No. 10800 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 459 Mass. 603 , 633 (2011). "In conducting our review, we 'give due weight to the experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge' of the board."
Cited 0 timesPublishedLoyal Order of Moose, Inc., Yarmouth Lodge 2270 v. Board of Health
439 Mass. 597 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 20, 2003
Tri-Nel Mgt., Inc. v. Board of Health of Barnstable, supra at 219. … Tri-Nel Mgt., Inc. v. Board of Health of Barnstable, *603 supra at 228. However, the principle just expressed applies when a party claims “[ejconomic harm alone . . . .” Id. at 227.
Cited 19 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1112 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 5, 2018
Kace v. … See Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 467 Mass. 598 , 616 (2014).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJacobus v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds
7 Mass. L. Rptr. 401 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Sep 4, 1997
Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liab. Policies and Bonds, 27 Mass.App.Ct. 470, 474 (1989); Faith Assembly of God v. State Bldg. Code Comm’n, 11 Mass.App.Ct. 333, 334 (1981). … Zoning Board of Appeals of Wellesley v. Housing Appeals Comm’n, 385 Mass. 651, 657 (1982), quoting Labor Relations Comm’n v. University Hosp., Inc., 359 Mass. 516, 521 (1971).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDoe, SORB No. 209081 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 6, 2017
At a minimum, the board is expected to follow its own regulations.11 Royce v. Commissioner of Correction, 390 10 In Poe v. … No. 7083 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFuchs Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Jet Spray Corp.
560 F. Supp. 1147 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 23, 1983
I am not to decide if the Board after a full hearing would in fact find that the Act has been violated. I need only conclude that the Board could come to that conclusion. Fuchs v. … Brown v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co., 218 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir.1955); Kaynard v.
Cited 7 timesPublished330 Mass. 573 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 3, 1953
See Wallace v. Lux Clock Co. 120 Conn. 280. The reviewing board did not undertake to find all the facts upon which the self insurer’s defence is based. … Radovsky v. Wexler, 273 Mass. 254, 257 . Continental Corp. v. Gowdy, 283 Mass. 204, 215-216 . Pitman v. J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. 324 Mass. 371, 375 . Restatement: Contracts, § 402, comment (b).
Cited 11 timesPublished322 Mass. 429 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 26, 1948
Browne, was injured on November 30, 1946, while working for her employer. The single member and the reviewing board found that Phyllis Browne, the daughter of the employee and her husband Walter J. … Browne, was born on September 8, 1932, and was living with the employee and her husband at the time of the injury. Dependency compensation was awarded to the employee.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1120 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 4, 2019
No. 7083 v. … No. 68549 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 470 Mass. 102 , 108-109 (2014), citing G. L. c. 30A, § 14 (7).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRitacco ex rel. Estate of Ritacco v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
9 Mass. L. Rptr. 542 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jan 7, 1999
The plaintiff suggests that the court has the authority to remand this case back to the Contributory Retirement Appeals Board for a further panel even though the applicant has been deceased since 1992.
Cited 0 timesPublished280 Mass. 477 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 26, 1932
The employee on January 25, 1924, while employed by Brown’s Beach Jacket Co. received an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. … The reviewing board affirmed and adopted the findings and decision of the single member. Thereafter a final *479 decree was entered in the Superior Court in accordance with the decision of the Industrial Accident Board.
Cited 9 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 17, 2019
The plaintiff, John Doe, appeals from his classification as a level two sex offender by the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB). … Ct. 81 , 84 (1995), quoting Shawmut Community Bank, N.A . v. Zagami , 30 Mass. App. Ct. 371 , 372-373 (1991), S . C ., 411 Mass. 807 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1121 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 6, 2019
The Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB) initially classified him as a level three sex offender, but he secured a right to a new administrative hearing after the Supreme Judicial Court issued Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. … No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 473 Mass. 297 , 298 (2015) (establishing that SORB's classification decisions must be based on clear and convincing evidence).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
113 N.E.3d 935 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Nov 19, 2018
No. 380316 v. … "In conducting our review, we 'give due weight to the experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge' of the board." Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 151564 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
94 Mass. App. Ct. 1114 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 18, 2018
When the validity of a decision by the board is on appeal, a reviewing court "must determine whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence." Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 10216 v. … "In conducting our review, we 'give due weight to the experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge' of the board." Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 151564 v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna