Case law

State v. Cornell

109 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1991

State v. O’Brien, supra. Without further detailing it, we conclude that there was evidence to support the trial court’s ruling that defendant conspired with Pinnell to rob Brown and, later, to rob Ruffner. … The criteria for determining admission of evidence of other crimes to prove identity was discussed by the Supreme Court regarding the Brown robbery in State v. Pinnell, supra.

Foote v. State

364 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2019

And plaintiffs purport to find support for that reading of Brown in TVKO v. Howland , 335 Or. 527 , 73 P.3d 905 (2003). … See, e.g. , Brown v.

State v. Jones

253 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 24, 2012

State v. Foster, 350 Or 161, 169 , 252 P3d 292 (2011) (citing Brown, 301 Or at 274-76 ). … State v. Smalley, 233 Or App 263, 267 , 225 P3d 844 , rev den, 348 Or 415 (2010) (citing Brown, 301 Or at 279 ).

Warner v. MAUS

209 Or. 529 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1956

Rayburn v. Day, 126 Or 135, 143, 144 ; 268 P 1002 . … In Bracht v.

Allstate Insurance v. Browning

598 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 1983

See also, Nielsen v. St. Paul Cos., 283 Or. 277 , 583 P.2d 545 (1978). … Even though coverage is excluded under the policy, Allstate may still have a duty to defend the Brownings, if withdrawal would prejudice Brownings. United Pacific Insurance v.

Dacosta v. NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.

242 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2002

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … In Smith v. Sandoz Ltd., No. 1:95-cv-3S89-MHS (N.D.

State v. Patterson

14 Or. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 1973

The issue on appeal involves a question of double jeopardy of the nature dealt with in State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 , rehearing denied (1972). … The Oregon Supreme Court in State v.

Koller v. Schmaing

254 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 2012

v. … See Ryan v.

Askay v. Maloney

85 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1917

For a general discussion of this and kindred subjects, see Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. (60 Mass.) 292; Morris v. Platt, 32 Conn. 75 ; Paxton v. Boyer, 67 Ill. 132 ( 16 Am. Rep. 615 ); Shaw v. … Perkins, 6 Or. 350 ; Glenn v. Savage, 14 Or. 567 ( 13 Pac. 442 ); Bailey v. Davis, 19 Or. 217 ( 23 Pac. 881 ); Bowen v. Clarke, 22 Or. 566 ( 30 Pac. 430 , 29 Am. St. Rep. 625 ); Geldard v.

Parkersville Drainage District v. Wattier

48 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1906

Miller, paid the consideration therefor, the board, on January 9, 1893, executed a deed of the premises to Yallier Wattier. … In Brown v.

State v. Trax

335 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2003

As this court explained in State v. … See generally State v.

Merrifield v. McClay

72 Or. 90 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1914

A. 206); Brown v. Norman, 65 Miss. 369 ( 4 South. 293 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 663 ). But such is not the invariable rule even in actions at law: Brown v. Norman, supra. … Cas. 246 ; Brown v. Norman, 65 Miss. 369 ( 4 South. 293 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 663 ); Scott v. Perrin, 7 Ky. (4 Bibb) 360 .

State v. Shields

280 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1977

Such an election would usually either constitute a waiver of Brown [State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1197 (1972)] rights to a single trial, or waiver of Fitzgerald [State v. … In that case we said (at 755-56): "The proscription laid down in Brown [State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1197 (1972)] was against the multiple prosecution of charges arising out of one transaction.

Putnam v. Stalker

50 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1907

Justice Bean, in Hess v. … Justice Wolverton, in Stamper v.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Runyon

320 F.R.D. 245 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

Washington v. Wash. … E.E.O.C. v.

State v. Clemons

267 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2014

Id. at 488-89 (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 US 590 , 95 S Ct 2254 , 45 L Ed 2d 416 (1975)). … See Brown, 422 US at 605 .

Smith v. Schmitt

112 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1924

BROWN, J. … “It was then the duty of the three gentlemen named * * , as vendors of these properties, to furnish the corporation with a competent and independent board of directors to negotiate this sale.” See, Receiver v.

Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

66 Or. App. 911 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 1984

More recently, in Brown v. … Brown v. Transcon Lines, supra, 284 Or at 597 .

State v. Van Nguyen

107 Or. App. 716 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

State v. Spencer, 305 Or 59, 70 , 750 P2d 147 (1988). (Footnotes omitted.) … In State v.

Lone Oak Racing v. Oregon Racing Com'n

162 Or. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1999

.” *118 In Brown v. … In deciding whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction, the Supreme Court’s decisions in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185 , 935 P2d 411 (1997), Hay v.