Case law

Hildreth v. Curtis & Son Co.

157 F. 394 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Dec 7, 1907

Prindle v. … Brown (decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit on August 2, 1907) 155 Fed. 531 , shows that proceedings in the Patent Office, even when a direct issue is made and passed on, operate as an estoppel only to

Fessenden v. Coolidge

114 Me. 147 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 22, 1915

Browne v. Ward, 51 Maine, 191. But they do not import a valuable consideration of any particular kind. They are evidence prima facie of a valuable consideration of some kind. … Hurley v. Farnsworth, 107 Maine, 306. He need not state the consideration. The statute does not contemplate that the claimant must in the claim filed advise the administrator as to these things.

Battles v. York Co. Mutual Fire Ins.

41 Me. 208 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

Leohner v. Home Mutual Ins. Co., 2 Bennett, 247. The insured must represent truly his interest in the property insured or his policy will be void. Brown v. Williams & Thomaston M. F. Ins. Co., Trustees, 28 Maine, 252. … Davenport v. New England M. F. Ins. Co. 6 Cush. 340 ; Packard & al. v. Agawam M. F. Ins. Co. 2 Gray, 334 .

Friends of the Boundary Mountains v. Land Use Regulation Commission

40 A.3d 947 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2012

If an “agency fails to make sufficient and clear findings of fact and such findings are necessary for judicial review, [this Court] will remand the matter to the agency or board to make the findings.” Carroll v. … York Ins. of Me., Inc. v.

Browne v. Dubey

251 A.2d 424 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 19, 1969

Only Eleanor Browne, Executrix, Eva Dubey and Victor’s daughters, Judith and Muriel, are parties to this proceeding. … Morrill v. Morrill, 116 Me. 154, 155 , 100 A. 756 .

Anthony v. Arpin

141 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1945

Copp v. Paradis, 130 Me., 464 A.; Maddox v. Brown, 71 Me., 432; Karahleos v. Dillingham, 119 Me., 165 A. Motions overruled.

Sawyer v. Walker

593 A.2d 210 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1991

Oscar Walker filed a notice of appeal from an order entered by the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Browne, J.) denying his post-trial motion for relief from an order entered on August 31, 1990 and imposing sanctions against … See Sawyer v. Walker, 572 A.2d 498 (Me.1990).

Edgell v. Hyde

114 Me. 431 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1916

Sposedo v. Merriman, 11 1 Maine, 530. … Hatch v. Brown, 63 Maine, 410; Gilchrist v. Partridge, 73 Maine, 214. And as to the admission against objection of the testimony of Charles G.

Town of Freeport v. Greenlaw

602 A.2d 1156 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 11, 1992

Saltonstall v. Cumming, 538 A.2d 289, 290 (Me.1988); M.R.Civ.P. 56(c). … See Town of Shapleigh v.

Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Waste Management, Inc.

875 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 31, 1994

Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Me.1990). … Brook Group, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., — U.S. -, -n. 1, 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 2587 n. 1, 125 L.Ed.2d 168 , 186 n. 1. The First Circuit follows a "variable cost” approach.

Jolovitz v. Redington & Co.

148 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 13, 1952

Lang v. Merwin, 99 Maine, 486, 489; State vs. Willis, 78 Maine, 70; State vs. Baitler, 131 Maine, 285; State vs. Googin, 117 Maine, 102. … Murray, J., in Brown vs. McCaffrey, et al, 143 Maine, 221, 226. Exceptions overruled.

Thomas v. Amoroso

451 A.2d 898 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 1982

Fisher v. Dame, Me., 433 A.2d 366, 372 (1981) (quoting Gagne v. Lewiston Crushed Stone Company, Inc., Me., 367 A.2d 613 (1976) (emphasis in original)). … See Schwanda v. Bonney, Me., 418 A.2d 163 (1980); Brown v. Town of Wells, Me., 402 A.2d 57 (1979).

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

728 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1990

The Great Northern Board may redeem the *808 rights for one cent each at any time prior to the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of Great Northern’s outstanding common stock. … See, e.g., Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries Inc., 644 F.Supp. 1229 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (construing New Jersey Corporation Act); Asarco Inc. v.

Leete & Lemieux, P.A. v. Horowitz

53 A.3d 1106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 2012

Co. v. Me. Employers’ Mut. Ins. … Notwithstanding that confidentiality, any person, including but not limited to members of the Board, Fee Arbitration Commission and Board staff may notify governmental officials of actual or threatened criminal conduct by

Thursby v. State

223 A.2d 61 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 27, 1966

Brown v. People, 8 Ill.2d 540 , 134 N.E.2d 760 (1956). Massey v. Moore, 348 U.S. 105 , 75 S.Ct. 145 , 99 L.Ed. 135 . … Dietz v. State, 149 Wis. 462 , 136 N.W. 166, 173 (1912). State v. Smith, 173 Kan. 813 , 252 P.2d 922, 923 (1953). Brown v. People, 8 Ill.2d 540 , 134 N.E.2d 760, 762 (1956). Magenton v.

Lynch v. South Congregational Parish

109 Me. 32 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 1912

Merrill v. Hayden, 86 Maine, 134; Jackson v. Phillips, 14 Allen, 539 ; Fish v. Atty. Gen’l, L. R. 4 Eq., 521. … It was a boarding as well as a day school. Its Board of Trustees and management, some of them clergymen, were affiliated with the Congregational denomination in this State.

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Collamore

100 Me. 578 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1905

The foregoing legal principles are established by the decisions of this court in Bath Savings Inst. v. Hathorn, 88 Maine, 122, and Norway Sav. Bank v. … Brown v. Crafts, 98 Maine, 40.

Holcomb v. Palmer

106 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1909

Taylor v. Brown, 88 Maine, 56. … See also O'Rourke v. Beard, 151 Mass. 9 ; Powers v. Rafferty, 184 Mass. 85 ; Sawyer v. Banfield, 55 N. H. 149; Taylor v. Taylor, 9 R. I. 119 ; Greene v. Wilbur, 15 R. I. 251; Hamilton v.

Ekstrom v. Hall

90 Me. 186 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1897

In Meagher v. … Wright v. Gray, supra.

The Hortensia

12 F. Cas. 532 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 15, 1877

V. There is another matter testified to by the two men from the Equal about which there could certainly be no mistake, and in relation to which, I regret to believe that they have designedly testified to a falsehood. … and that his appeals were heard by those on board that vessel.