Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.68s
Musical Arts Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
466 F. App'x 7 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2012
NLRB v. Nat’l Truck Rental Co., 239 F.2d 422, 425 (D.C.Cir.1956); see also 29 U.S.C. § 159 (a). … Edison Co. v. NLRB, 460 U.S. 693, 705, 708 , 103 S.Ct. 1467 , 75 L.Ed.2d 387 (1983) (emphasis added); see also Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 520 v. NLRB, 955 F.2d 744, 751 (D.C.Cir.1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCarl v. United States ex rel. Leland
42 F.2d 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1930
Thereupon appellee challenged the ruling as to the deficiency tax by appeal to the United States Board of Tax Appeals. That Board on January 20, 1930,. affirmed the decision of the Commissioner. Leland v. … Ed. 184 ; Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 551 , 48 S. Ct. 587 , 72 L. Ed. 985 ; Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Brown v. Commissioner (C. C.
Cited 13 timesPublishedNoll v. Board of Parole for Government of District of Columbia
191 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1951
The petition to compel removal of the warrant lodged by the District of Columbia Board of Parole against appellant was properly dismissed. Affirmed. 1 . Zerbst v. … Kidwell, 1938, 304 U.S. 359, 361-362 , 58 S.Ct. 872 , 82 L.Ed. 1399 ; Anderson v. Corall, 1923, 263 U.S. 193, 196-197 , 44 S.Ct. 43 , 68 L.Ed. 247 ; Washington’ v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLincoln Savings and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
856 F.2d 1558 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 23, 1988
Judge *1560 Gerhard Gesell rejected both claims, awarding summary judgment to the Board. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 670 F.Supp. 449 (D.D.C.1987) (“Memorandum”). … E.g., Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663 , 82 S.Ct. 1089 , 8 L.Ed.2d 180 (1962).
Cited 12 timesPublishedHarrison v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
758 A.2d 19 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2000
Harmon v. Board of Trustees, supra, mem. op. at 7. … Hoage v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 714 A.2d 776 (D.C. 1998); Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 695 A.2d 1164 (D.C.1997). 2 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedSheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
989 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1993
See LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. NLRB, 408 F.2d 1122, 1127 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 337 F.Supp. 381 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. … The Board’s findings are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence and we give “substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts.” Avecor, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrusco Tug & Barge, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
696 F. App'x 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 15, 2017
.’ ” Alois Box Co. v. … Co. v. NLRB, 854 F.3d 55, 65 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJudicial Watch, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
773 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011
maintains a log of visitors who come to the Board’s buildings to see Board governors and staff. … Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 876 (D.C.Cir.1989); see also Blazy v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedInvestment Co. Inst. v. BOARD OF GOV. OF FED. RES. SYS.
398 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1975
. § 1848 provides the exclusive means for reviewing orders of the Board under the Bank Holding Company Act. Whitney National Bank v. … Whitney National Bank v. Bank of New Orleans and Trust Company, 379 U.S. 411 , 85 S.Ct. 551 , 13 L.Ed.2d 386 (1965); Deutsch Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNovartis Nutrition Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
23 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 2001
NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C.Cir.2000), such that the Board’s interpretation of the facts is reasonably defensible. See Harter Tomato Prod. Co. v. … The Board found the company’s explanation of the discharge was pretextual. We find no basis for overturning the Board’s determination of the company’s motive. See Laro Maintenance Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdmund J. Flynn Company v. Schlosser
265 A.2d 599 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1970
See Gordon v. … Johnson, D.C.App., 229 A.2d 163 (1967) (and cases cited therein); Brier v. Orenberg, D.C.Mun.App., 90 A.2d 832 (1952); Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559 (1950); 3 Corbin on Contracts § 589 (1960). 8 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedRush University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board
708 F. App'x 692 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2017
Rush University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, 833 F.3d 202, 207 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See WLOS TV, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 932 F.2d 993, 995 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBurnice Stackhouse v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
111 A.3d 636 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2015
See McCamey v. … Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublished116 F.2d 556 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1940
Miller v. Miller, 178 Md. 12 , 11 A.2d 630 . 4 Campbell v. Campbell, 174 Md. 229 , 198 A. 414 , 116 A.L.R. 939 . But cf. Miller v. Miller, supra note 3 . 5 Herrick v. Herrick, supra; Brown v. … Brown, 172 Ky. 754 , 189 S.W. 921 ; Cooke v. Cooke, 164 N.C. 272 , 80 S.E. 178 , 49 L.R.A.,N.S., 1034; Schuster v. Schuster, 42 Ariz. 190 , 23 P.2d 559 . 6 Salinko v. Salinko, 177 Wis. 475 , 188 N.W. 606 . Cf.
Cited 30 timesPublishedInternational Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees v. National Labor Relations Board
334 F.3d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2003
Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). When the Board’s decision turns on its interpretation of the NLRA, the familiar two-step Chevron test applies. Jacoby v. … See Teamsters Local 357 v. NLRB, 365 U.S. 667 , 81 S.Ct. 835 , 6 L.Ed.2d 11 (1961); see also Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers of Am. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAmerican Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. National Labor Relations Board
462 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1972
See Federal Land Bank v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 99-100 , 62 S.Ct. 1 , 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941); Argosy Limited v. Hennigan, 404 F.2d 14, 20 (5th Cir. 1968); United States v. … the petition for review and enforce the Board’s order.
Cited 1 timesPublishedInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
487 F.2d 1113 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1972
Union v. … B. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedResolution Trust Corp. v. McDougal
158 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1994
In OTS v. Dobbs, Civ. … See FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970); FEC v. Committee to Elect Lyndon LaRouche, 613 F.2d 849 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1019 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980); United States v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations Board
326 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1963
The Board adopted the finding. True, in National Labor Relations Board v. … Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPPG Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
460 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2012
Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C.Cir.2011) (citation omitted); see also 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). … Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. NLRB, 234 F.3d 1295, 1297 (D.C.Cir.2000) (per curiam) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna