Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.12s
Parnes v. Board of Excise Commissioners of Elizabeth
82 N.J.L. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1912
On the other hand, in Eckersly v. … Consequently, as prosecutor made no attempt to put the board in possession of the facts now claimed to exist, he is not entitled to urge them here. Smith v. Elizabeth, 17 Vroom 312 ; Conover v. Gregson, 43 Id. 103.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railroad
68 N.J.L. 618 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1903
Consolidated Traction Co. v. Lamberton, 30 Vroom 297 ; S. C., 31 Id. 452; Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. Block, 26 Id. 605; Atlantic Coast Railway Co. v. … The case in this aspect falls within the doctrine of Pennsylvania, Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Vroom 180 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
104 N.J.L. 165 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1927
Cited 4 timesPublishedWilliams v. Red Bank Board of Education
502 F. Supp. 1366 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 22, 1980
Rosko v. … Ass’n v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedL.W. v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of Education
189 N.J. 381 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 2007
Frugis v. Bracigliano, 177 N.J. 250, 280 , 827 A.2d 1040 (2003). … could not be exercised over free adults”); Davis v.
Cited 55 timesPublishedTrainor v. Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders
216 N.J. Super. 289 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1987
See Sewell v. … Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Cty. of Essex, 105 N.J.Super. 271, 282 (App.Div.1969) (also addressing N.J.S.A. 19:31-2); Nolan v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education of Greater Egg Harbor Regional School District
93 N.J. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Eckert v. Board of Aldermen
7 N.J. Misc. 850 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 3, 1929
The action of the city is based upon chapter 264 of the laws of 1929, which grants power to change ward lines to “any municipality having a board of aldermen.” … See Ross v. Winsor, 48 N. J. L. 96; Dobbins v. Long Branch, 59 Id. 146; Delaware River Transportation Co. v. Trenton, 86 Id. 48; affirmed, 86 Id. 679, and Hueston v. Atwater, 97 Id. 414.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
197 N.J. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 2009
963 A.2d 844 (2009) 197 N.J. 475 BOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. C-505 September Term 2008, 63,318 Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 20, 2009. Petition for certification. Granted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMeyer v. Board of Education of Middletown Tp.
9 N.J. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1952
In Batts v. … In Herman v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrowning v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen
79 N.J.L. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1910
The proceedings of the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Bergen that were challenged by the prosecutor and sustained by the Supreme Court culminated in the awarding of a contract to F. E. … Long Company, who was not the lowest bidder for the work specified in the proposal, there was a substantial compliance on the part of the board of chosen freeholders with the provisions of the act of March 28th, 1892 (Pamph
Cited 4 timesPublishedJones v. East Windsor Regional Board of Education
158 N.J. Super. 496 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1977
Cited 3 timesPublishedJamison v. Morris School District Board of Education
198 N.J. Super. 411 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1985
A.C. 6:3-1.20 implements Donaldson v. Bd. of Ed. of No. … A nontenured teacher claiming the benefit of N.J.S.A. 18A:27-11 is still subject to the board’s broad right to reduce force pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:28-9, Old Bridge Bd. of Educ. v. Old Bridge Educ.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDunbar Homes, Inc. v. the Zoning Board of Adjustment
448 N.J. Super. 583 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 2017
In its resolution, the Board relied upon Rumson Estates, Inc. v. … v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedTorres v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
198 N.J. 311 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 11, 2009
966 A.2d 1079 (2009) 198 N.J. 311 TORRES v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 11, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Empire State Surety Co.
83 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 1912
Chester Glass Co. v. Dewey, 16 Mass. 94 ; Rutland and Burlington Railroad Co. v. Proctor, 29 Vt. 93 ; Union National Bank v. Matthews, 98 U. S. 621 ; Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 494 ; Whitney Arms Co. v. … Major, &c., of New York v. Sonneborn, 113 Id. 423, 426; City of Buffalo v. Balcom, 134 Id. 532.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoyal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes
78 N.J.L. 337 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1909
The plaintiff in error then appealed from the county board’s valuation to the state board of equalization of taxes, and that board, after hearing testimony, affirmed the value fixed upon the property by the county board. … Tuckerton Railroad Co. v. State Board of *339 Assessors, 48 Vroom 614 , and cases cited. That there was considerable evidence for this purpose is disclosed by an examination of the depositions returned with the writ.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSprint Spectrum L.P. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
21 F. Supp. 3d 381 · District Court, D. New Jersey · May 12, 2014
Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1 , 526 A.2d 109, 116 (1987). Thus, both the TCA and New Jersey law employ the substantial evidence standard. Cellular Telephone Co. v. … P’ship v. Clarkstown, 612 F.3d 97, 105 (2d Cir.2010).
Cited 3 timesPublishedLakatong Lodge, No. 114 v. Board of Education
84 N.J. Eq. 112 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jan 11, 1915
Backes, V. C. … Stevens v. Shippen, 28 N. J. Eq. 487; Taylor v. Bryn Mawr College, 34 N. J. Eq. 101; Alfred University v. Hancock, 69 N. J. Eq. 470; Hilliard v. Parker, 76 N. J. Eq. 447; 6 Cyc. 910; 5 R. C. L. 330.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAbelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists
5 N.J. 412 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1950
Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608 , 55 S. Ct. 570 , 79 L. Ed. 1086 (1935). The provision of R. … New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co., supra. A penal provision is to be strictly construed.
Cited 105 timesPublished
Ask Donna