Case law

Whidden v. Seelye

40 Me. 247 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

In Brown v. Gracey, 2 D. & R. 41, Abbott, C. J., said, “ that if the law of Scotland differed from the law of England, as to the liability of the defendants, it was for the defendant to show it.” … In Mather v.

Small v. Robinson

69 Me. 425 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1879

Globe Works v. Wright, 106 Mass. 207 . … A mortgagor of horses cannot, without the knowledge, acquiescence and consent of the mortgagee, intrust the horses to be boarded so as to subject them to a lien for keeping, as against the mortgagee. Sargent v.

Questions Submiteed by the House of Representatives, March 25, 1903

97 Me. 595 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 1903

The board of State assessors shall annually assess a .tax upon all lands situated in this State in places not incorporated as a town or plantation, and not paying a municipal tax, at the rate of fifteen mills on the dollar … People v. Weaver, 100 U. S. 539 .

Wood & Ewer Co. v. Ham

14 F.2d 995 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 29, 1926

He cites also In When Clothing Company, 1 Board of Tax Appeals, and the case of Orkin Bros., 2 Board of Tax Appeals. I am nnable to obtain much aid from the cases cited. … S. v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co. (C. C. A.) 273 F. 657 , 15 A. L.

Sheltra v. Auger

376 A.2d 463 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1977

Detective Agency v. Inhabitants of Sagadahoc, 137 Me. 233, 237-238 [ 18 A.2d 308 ] (1941). … “It is further ADJUDGED and DECREED that the action of the Board of County Commissioners of November 5, 1975, purporting to discharge Doris G. Camire and Celina A.

State v. McKenzie

605 A.2d 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 28, 1992

State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985). When, as here, the Superior Court acts as an intermediate appellate court, we examine directly the record of the District Court. State v. … See State v. O’Brien, 434 A.2d 9, 13 (Me.1981); State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 542 (Me.1980).

Tripp v. Huff

606 A.2d 792 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1992

See Fitanides v. Holman, 310 A.2d 65, 67 (Me.1973). He argues, however, that our rule on reservations to a stranger in title is archaic and should now be abandoned by this court. … Brown v. Heirs of Maria Fuller, 347 A.2d 127, 130 (Me.1975) (citation omitted).

John Doe v. Univ. of St. Thomas

368 F. Supp. 3d 1309 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 21, 2019

She appointed an Appeal Board, who considered Doe's appeal and determined that none of the grounds to overturn a decision were applicable. ( Id. ) Lange agreed with the Board's recommendation and upheld the Factfinders' original … See Goss v.

Marcello v. Maine

464 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 13, 2006

See, e.g., Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355 , 98 S.Ct. 1099 , 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978); Pierson, 386 U.S. at 553-54 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 ; Brown v. … Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 65 , 109 S.Ct. 2304 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); Brown, 291 F.3d at 92 .

Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. Pacific-Alaska Nav. Co.

260 F. 973 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 1919

Insurance Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1 , 20 L. Ed. 90 ; Morewood et al. v. Enequist, 23 How. 493 , 16 L. Ed. 516 ; North Pacific S. S. Co. v. Hale Brothers Co., 249 U. S. 119, 125 , 39 Sup. Ct. 221, 63 L. … Ward v. Thompson, 22 How. 330, 334 , 16 L. Ed. 249 ; Karrick v. Hannaman, 168 U. S. 328 , 18 Sup. Ct. 135, 42 L. Ed. 484 ; Fechteler et al. v. Palm Brothers, 133 Fed. 462 , 66 C. C. A. 336 ; Dwinel v.

Whittier v. Vose

16 Me. 403 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1839

Ed. 60; Doe v. Martin & al., 4 T. R. 39. … Warren v. Mains, 7 Johns. R. 476; Coit v. Houston, 3 Johns. Cas. 243 .

Searway v. Rainey

709 A.2d 735 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 1998

. [¶ 3] As we made clear in Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606 (Me.1994), even intentional torts fall within the exclusivity and immunity provisions of the Act. … Cos. v.

Edgell v. Hyde

114 Me. 431 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1916

Sposedo v. Merriman, 11 1 Maine, 530. … Hatch v. Brown, 63 Maine, 410; Gilchrist v. Partridge, 73 Maine, 214. And as to the admission against objection of the testimony of Charles G.

Hildreth v. Curtis & Son Co.

157 F. 394 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Dec 7, 1907

Prindle v. … Brown (decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit on August 2, 1907) 155 Fed. 531 , shows that proceedings in the Patent Office, even when a direct issue is made and passed on, operate as an estoppel only to

Fessenden v. Coolidge

114 Me. 147 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 22, 1915

Browne v. Ward, 51 Maine, 191. But they do not import a valuable consideration of any particular kind. They are evidence prima facie of a valuable consideration of some kind. … Hurley v. Farnsworth, 107 Maine, 306. He need not state the consideration. The statute does not contemplate that the claimant must in the claim filed advise the administrator as to these things.

Friends of the Boundary Mountains v. Land Use Regulation Commission

40 A.3d 947 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2012

If an “agency fails to make sufficient and clear findings of fact and such findings are necessary for judicial review, [this Court] will remand the matter to the agency or board to make the findings.” Carroll v. … York Ins. of Me., Inc. v.

State v. Intoxicating Liquors

54 Me. 564 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

The portion found and adjudged by this board unfit is to be cast out and spilled upon the ground. … Commonwealth v. Ryan, 5 Mass., 90 . The same doctrine is reaffirmed in Hill v. Wells, 6 Pick., 104 , and in Commonwealth v. Emery, 11 Cushing, 411 . In the latter case, C. J.

Lambert v. Lambert

117 Me. 471 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1918

H., 422, and Jones v. Brown, 34 N. H., 439. These cases arose under a statute substantially similar to ours. … We might cite numerous authorities, but think it necessary to refer only to Wright v. Holmes, 100 Maine, 508, and Marshall v. Berry, 13 Allen, 43 , and cases cited therein.

Anthony v. Arpin

141 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1945

Copp v. Paradis, 130 Me., 464 A.; Maddox v. Brown, 71 Me., 432; Karahleos v. Dillingham, 119 Me., 165 A. Motions overruled.

Farnsworth v. City of Rockland

83 Me. 508 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1891

In Millett v. … But in this State, in Calais v.