Case law

Local 1441 v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1964

326 F.2d 663 LOCAL 1441, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, and Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, and Kentuckiana Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing

Local Union No. 112, International Union Allied Industrial Workers v. Rothman

209 F. Supp. 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1962

In Capital Service, Inc. et al. v. N. L. R. … The National Labor Relations Act is a law ‘regulating commerce’ (National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 [14] [, 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 ]).”

Finch, Pruyn & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

296 F. App'x 83 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 2008

Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 2 (D.C.Cir. 1988). … Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137, 1141 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Int’l Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir. 1994)). Pursuant to D.C.

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Hirsch Lumber Co.

35 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1929

In Thomas & Willis v. Wooldridge, 2 Woods, 667 , 23 Fed. Cas. page 986 , No. 13,918, in which Mr. … L. p. 807, § 37; Henry v. Gold Park Mining Co. (C. C.) 15 F. 649 ; American Bank v. Rollins, 99 Mass. 313 ; American Bank v. Snow, 9 R. I. 11, 98 Am. Dec. 364 ; Burrill v. Letson, 2 Speers (S. C.) 378.

Rush University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

708 F. App'x 692 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2017

Rush University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, 833 F.3d 202, 207 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See WLOS TV, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 932 F.2d 993, 995 (D.C.

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

277 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1960

Counsel, Litigation and Research, Civil Aeronautics Board, with whom Messrs. Franklin M. Stone, Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, Ulrich V. … But in Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Parks v. Parks

116 F.2d 556 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1940

Miller v. Miller, 178 Md. 12 , 11 A.2d 630 . 4 Campbell v. Campbell, 174 Md. 229 , 198 A. 414 , 116 A.L.R. 939 . But cf. Miller v. Miller, supra note 3 . 5 Herrick v. Herrick, supra; Brown v. … Brown, 172 Ky. 754 , 189 S.W. 921 ; Cooke v. Cooke, 164 N.C. 272 , 80 S.E. 178 , 49 L.R.A.,N.S., 1034; Schuster v. Schuster, 42 Ariz. 190 , 23 P.2d 559 . 6 Salinko v. Salinko, 177 Wis. 475 , 188 N.W. 606 . Cf.

Albra v. Board of Trustees of Miami Dade College

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2018

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Moreover, in evaluating subject matter jurisdiction, the court “may consider materials outside the pleadings.” Am. Freedom Law Ctr. v. … See Tennessee v.

Revolving Door

445 A.2d 615 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1982

(Less than a month earlier, on March 31,1980, a division of this court had issued its decision in Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning, D.C.App., 413 A.2d 1276 (1980); Armstrong v.

Tic-The Industrial Company Southeast, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

126 F.3d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1997

Evidence of Anti-Union Discrimination Board findings must be respected on review if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e) (1994); Laro Maintenance Corp. v. … Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 280 (D.C.Cir.1988).

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Dep't v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 21, 2026

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD, et al., APPELLEES. … Simpson for appellee Public Employee Relations Board. Daniel J. McCartin, with whom Benjamin J.

Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

283 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1960

Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 330 , 197 F.2d 384 ; see American Trucking Ass'ns v. United States, 1957, 355 U.S. 141 , 78 S.Ct. 165 , 2 L.Ed.2d 158 ; United States v. … Since Southeast was fairly on notice that Southern was in a competitive position for the Tennessee route, the Board could properly certify Southern. Civil Aeronautics Board v.

TCI Cablevision of Montana, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

53 F. App'x 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2002

NLRB v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21, 23 , 85 S.Ct. 171 , 13 L.Ed.2d 1 (1964). The Board has held that the employer has the burden of showing an “honest belief that the employee has engaged in serious misconduct.” … , Inc. v.

Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

546 F.2d 989 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 1976

Having clarified the basis for its different results the Board has fully complied with this court’s remand mandate. Local 814, Teamsters v. NLRB, supra, 512 F.2d at 567; see NLRB v. … Petitioner further argues that the Board’s Supplemental Decision should be rejected as mere post hoc rationalization. In Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v.

Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board

500 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1974

, and Helpers, Local 745 v. … See, e. g., Garment Workers v. NLRB, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 71 . 83, 463 F.2d 907 , 919 (1972). . NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 743 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962). . See NLRB v.

Richardson v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2016

Baird v. Gotbaum, 792 F.3d 166, 169 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2015). The Court also considers the arguments and allegations in Mr. Richardson’s opposition memorandum. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Supp. 2d 185, 190 (D.D.C. 2013); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 78 (D.D.C. 2009); Hardy v. District of Columbia, 601 F. Supp. 2d 182, 187 (D.D.C. 2009); Jenkins v. Jackson, 538 F.

Avante at Boca Raton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

54 F. App'x 502 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 2002

JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the Board’s opinions in Avante at Boca Raton, Inc., 323 NLRB 555 (1997), and Avante at Boca Raton, Inc., 334 NLRB No. 56 (2001).

Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1963

The Board adopted the finding. True, in National Labor Relations Board v. … Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra.

World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Oakland, California Board of Port Commissioners, Intervenors

547 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1976

Consequently, rigid constraints on the Board’s ability to consider applications on their merits are generally disfavored. See, e. g., Civil Aeronautics Board v. … See, e. g., Saturn Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 157 U.S. App.D.C. 281, 483 F.2d 1284 (1973); Pan American World Airways, Inc. v.

Mason v. Cutts

16 F. Cas. 1035 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1838

that the plaintiff’s intestate had not a specific lien on the ship; and if he had, he abandoned it when he received bills of exchange for the amount of his claim, and therefore he can only come in as a general creditor of Brown