Case law

Witham v. McNutt

186 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1949

Brown v. Bailey, 151 Or. 496 , 51 P. 2d 671 , the proceeding was in the nature of quo warranto. There was a failure to post one of the required notices in one of the precincts. … Instructions and all other election board supplies were also furnished.

State v. Marquette

39 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1979

The answer requires an analysis of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … v.

Brady v. East Portland Sheet Metal Works

222 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

The agreed commission for performance by plaintiff was that provided by Portland Eealty Board rules. … This procedure is pursuant to the holding in Brown v. Bonesteele, 218 Or 312 , 344 P2d 928 .

Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

298 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1984

The following year, in Brown v. … We are aware of the dicta in Brown v.

Hurlburt v. Morris

68 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913

Brown, were paid to him. … Rep. 501); Kilbourn v. Sunderland, 130 U. S. 505, 514 ( 32 L. Ed. 1005 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 594); Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U. S. 461, 478, 481 ( 45 L. Ed. 1183 , 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 845).

State v. Huddleston

5 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1971

The applicable rule was clearly and concisely set out in State v. … State v. Brown, 89 Adv Sh 741, — Or App —, 461 P2d 836 (1969); State v.

Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co.

142 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1933

Potter v. Shields, 174 Mich. 121 ( 140 N. W. 500 ); Fruit Dispatch Co. v. C. C. Taft Co., 197 Iowa 409 ( 197 N. W. 302 ); Seefus v. DeVaughn, 108 Neb. 628 ( 188 N. W. 235 ); Leonard Seed Co. v. … Dollen & Sons v. Carl R. Miller Tractor Co., 241 N. W. 307; Tamkin v. Nelson-Dowling Coal Co., 82 N. H. 96 ( 130 Atl. 26 ); Smith v. Bank of State Riley Ch. (S. C.) 152; Habersham v. Rodrigues, 1 Speers (S.

Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs v. Deschutes Cty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2024

Shirzad, Garrett Brown, and David J. … State v.

State v. Ellis

14 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

I refer to State v. Brown. * * *” ① The court thereupon dismissed the burglary indictment “with prejudice.” … . * * Affirmed. ① State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). ② For a discussion of what constitutes the same transaction, see State v.

Gerber v. Multnomah County

143 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1933

See also: Bailey v. Benton County, 61 Or. 390 ( 111 P. 376 , 122 P. 755 ); Gigoux v. Yamhill County, 73 Or. 212 ( 144 P. 437 ); Spencer v. School District No. 1, 121 Or. 511 ( 254 P. 357 ). … Although defendant referred to this motion as one for a directed verdict, it was in effect nothing more than a motion for an involuntary nonsuit: Wicks v. Sanborn, 72 Or. 321 ( 143 P. 1007 ); Brown v.

State v. Evans

236 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 2010

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … Under O’Key and Brown , “scientific evidence” is admissible if it is relevant under OEC 401, helpful to the trier of fact under OEC 702, 1 and not subject to exclusion under OEC 403. In State v.

State v. Ayers

16 Or. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 1974

One justice dissented on the grounds that *660 he did not agree with State v. Brown, supra, in which he had also dissented. … As the state points out in its brief the revisers of the new criminal procedure code were aware of both State v. Brown, supra, and State v.

Mt. Sexton Properties, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

306 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1988

Greene v. Lindsey, 456 US 444, 450 , 102 S Ct 1874 , 72 L Ed 2d 249 (1982). The cases on which plaintiffs rely, beginning with Mullane and extending to Mennonite Board of Missions v. … Brown v. City of Salem, 251 Or 150, 155 , 444 P2d 936 (1968) (quoting Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 US 106, 109 , 54 S Ct 593 , 78 L Ed 1155 (1934)).

Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State

266 Or. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

E.g., Koller v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board, 243 Or App 639 , 258 P3d 1285 (2011). … E.g., Brundridge v. Board of Parole, 192 Or App 648, 656-57 , 87 P3d 703 , rev den, 337 Or 327 (2004).

Deniff v. Charles R. McCormick & Co.

105 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1922

L.; State v. Hembree, 54 Or. 463 ( 103 Pac. 1008 ); Stamm v. Wood, 86 Or. 174 ( 168 Pac. 69 ); State v. Rader, 94 Or. 432, 456 ( 186 Pac. 79 ). … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Waller v. Drago

611 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 1985

In Morrissey v. … Citing Baker v.

State v. Rook

14 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

Although our Supreme Court in State v. Fair, 263 Or 383 , 502 P2d 1150 (1972), held that State v. Brown, supra, was not to be applied retroactively, defendant contends that Fair was in effect overruled by Robinson v. … In State v.

State of Or. v. City of Rajneeshpuram

598 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 1984

Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Defendants rely in *1216 part on Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 450 U.S. 707 , 101 S.Ct. 1425 , 67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1981), and Sherbert v.

State v. James

159 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1999

See State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 459 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972) (reserving that question). … The parties would have us look to Brown v.

State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANY

9 Or. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1972

Section 2-1.1 (v). … State v. Brown, 73 Or 325 , 144 P 444 (1914).” The above statute requires no greater intent than the words of the offense carry. This is what the indictment alleged and that is all that is required. See, State v.