Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.44s

  • American Baptist Homes of the West v. National Labor Relations Board

    858 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 2017

    Co. v. FCC, 129 F.3d 625, 629 (D.C. … Power v. FERC, 493 F.3d 239, 268 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. DOT, 137 F.3d 640, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1998).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    564 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2009

    Asiana Airlines v. FAA, 134 F.3d 393, 398 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting C.F. Commc’ns Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735, 739 (D.C. Cir. 1997)). … See United States v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

    695 A.2d 1164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997

    See Evenrud v. … Seefeldt v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

    164 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016

    Brown v. … [and] sharpen[s] the issues to be litigated,” Brown v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • U-Haul Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    490 F.3d 957 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2007

    We review the Board’s Decision and Order for abuse of discretion. See Canadian Am. Oil Co. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 469, 473 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343, 348 (1984).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Plumbers And Steamfitters Local 342 v. National Labor Relations Board

    598 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1979

    NLRB v. … of the agency. 36 Contrary to the majority's assertions, affirming the Board's decision on the construction suggested by the Board's counsel does not violate the doctrine of SEC v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bender v. Jordan

    612 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2009

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Brown v. Paulson, 541 F.Supp.2d 379, 383 (D.D.C.2008) (internal citations omitted). III. ANALYSIS The Third-Party Plaintiffs take the position that five directors and the President/CEO were sued by Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cordelia Kelsey, Infant, by Her Parent, Louise Kelsey v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

    498 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1974

    Douds, supra note 38 , 339 U.S. at 407 ; United States v. CIO, supra note 38 , 335 U.S. at 121. 44 . Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 45 . Bolling v. … Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 300-301 . 52 . Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., supra note 31, 402 U.S. at 18. 53 . Id. 54 . Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 301 . 55 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Charlotte Amphitheater Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    82 F.3d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1996

    See also NLRB v. … While there may be merit to this argument, it is not to be found in the Board's decision. In a petition for enforcement, a court may consider only the Board's own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel. SEC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • San Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States

    655 F.2d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

    San Antonio, Texas v. United States, 631 F.2d 831 (D.C.Cir.1980). . San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 355 I.C.C. 405 (1976), aff'd, 555 F.2d 637 (8th Cir. 1977). . Id. at 418. . San Antonio, Texas v. … San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 364 I.C.C. 887 (1981).

    Reversed on other grounds by Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Epilepsy Foundation v. National Labor Relations Board

    268 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2001

    Thus, as noted in NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Local 1441, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1963

    We remand the case to the Board for the taking of the testimony of Ungar and LaVictor, together with any other testimony which may assist the Board in determining whether or not a conspiracy to violate the sections of the … If the Board finds that such a conspiracy did exist, it will provide appropriate remedies. So ordered. .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Teamsters Local Union No. 328 v. National Labor Relations Board

    419 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1969

    Accordingly, we grant enforcement in No. 21,977; and we affirm the Board’s disposition of the Grunlund matter in No. 21,913. See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 379 U.S. 203 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 , 6 A.L.R.3d 1130 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. N. L. R. B.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Dietz

    675 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1996

    Neither Bar Counsel nor Dietz has filed an exception to the Board’s recommendation. … The District of Columbia Court of Appeals previously has sanctioned Respondent in a disciplinary case as a result of his misconduct involving one of those clients (Mary Brown). In re Dietz, 633 A.2d 850 (D.C.1993).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics

    628 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1980

    Cir. 1971); NLRB v. … This does not imply that changed circumstances like those in this case will make a Board order moot. Generally, they will not. See NLRB v. Raytheon Co., 398 U.S. 25 , 90 S.Ct. 1547 , 26 L.Ed.2d 21 (1970); NLRB v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    298 F. App'x 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

    This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … See Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo y Beneficiencia de P.R. v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 158, 166 (1st Cir.2005); see also Adair Standish Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Local 1441 v. National Labor Relations Board

    326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1964

    326 F.2d 663 LOCAL 1441, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, and Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, and Kentuckiana Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Finch, Pruyn & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    296 F. App'x 83 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 2008

    Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 2 (D.C.Cir. 1988). … Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137, 1141 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Int’l Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir. 1994)). Pursuant to D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Hirsch Lumber Co.

    35 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1929

    In Thomas & Willis v. Wooldridge, 2 Woods, 667 , 23 Fed. Cas. page 986 , No. 13,918, in which Mr. … L. p. 807, § 37; Henry v. Gold Park Mining Co. (C. C.) 15 F. 649 ; American Bank v. Rollins, 99 Mass. 313 ; American Bank v. Snow, 9 R. I. 11, 98 Am. Dec. 364 ; Burrill v. Letson, 2 Speers (S. C.) 378.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles

    140 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1944

    Brown, Administrator, v. Wilemon, 5 Cir., 139 F.2d 730 . Act of May 31, 1941, 55 Stat. 236 , which amended the Act of Tune 28, 1940, 54 Stat. 676 . Perkins v. Brown, D.G.,S.D.Ga., 53 F.Supp. 176 . … Wright v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 89 ; Nichols & Co. v. Secretary of Agriculture, 1 Cir., 131 F.2d 651 ; Nelson v. Secretary of Agriculture, 7 Cir., 133 F.2d 453 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.