Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.44s
American Baptist Homes of the West v. National Labor Relations Board
858 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 2017
Co. v. FCC, 129 F.3d 625, 629 (D.C. … Power v. FERC, 493 F.3d 239, 268 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. DOT, 137 F.3d 640, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLaurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
564 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2009
Asiana Airlines v. FAA, 134 F.3d 393, 398 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting C.F. Commc’ns Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735, 739 (D.C. Cir. 1997)). … See United States v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedGilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
695 A.2d 1164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997
See Evenrud v. … Seefeldt v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedShinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
164 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016
Brown v. … [and] sharpen[s] the issues to be litigated,” Brown v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedU-Haul Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
490 F.3d 957 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2007
We review the Board’s Decision and Order for abuse of discretion. See Canadian Am. Oil Co. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 469, 473 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343, 348 (1984).
Cited 8 timesPublishedPlumbers And Steamfitters Local 342 v. National Labor Relations Board
598 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1979
NLRB v. … of the agency. 36 Contrary to the majority's assertions, affirming the Board's decision on the construction suggested by the Board's counsel does not violate the doctrine of SEC v.
Cited 3 timesPublished612 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2009
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Brown v. Paulson, 541 F.Supp.2d 379, 383 (D.D.C.2008) (internal citations omitted). III. ANALYSIS The Third-Party Plaintiffs take the position that five directors and the President/CEO were sued by Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublished498 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1974
Douds, supra note 38 , 339 U.S. at 407 ; United States v. CIO, supra note 38 , 335 U.S. at 121. 44 . Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 45 . Bolling v. … Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 300-301 . 52 . Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., supra note 31, 402 U.S. at 18. 53 . Id. 54 . Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 301 . 55 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedCharlotte Amphitheater Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
82 F.3d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1996
See also NLRB v. … While there may be merit to this argument, it is not to be found in the Board's decision. In a petition for enforcement, a court may consider only the Board's own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel. SEC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSan Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States
655 F.2d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1981
San Antonio, Texas v. United States, 631 F.2d 831 (D.C.Cir.1980). . San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 355 I.C.C. 405 (1976), aff'd, 555 F.2d 637 (8th Cir. 1977). . Id. at 418. . San Antonio, Texas v. … San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 364 I.C.C. 887 (1981).
Reversed on other grounds by Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982)Cited 13 timesPublishedEpilepsy Foundation v. National Labor Relations Board
268 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2001
Thus, as noted in NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLocal 1441, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1963
We remand the case to the Board for the taking of the testimony of Ungar and LaVictor, together with any other testimony which may assist the Board in determining whether or not a conspiracy to violate the sections of the … If the Board finds that such a conspiracy did exist, it will provide appropriate remedies. So ordered. .
Cited 2 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 328 v. National Labor Relations Board
419 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1969
Accordingly, we grant enforcement in No. 21,977; and we affirm the Board’s disposition of the Grunlund matter in No. 21,913. See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 379 U.S. 203 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 , 6 A.L.R.3d 1130 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. N. L. R. B.
Cited 1 timesPublished675 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1996
Neither Bar Counsel nor Dietz has filed an exception to the Board’s recommendation. … The District of Columbia Court of Appeals previously has sanctioned Respondent in a disciplinary case as a result of his misconduct involving one of those clients (Mary Brown). In re Dietz, 633 A.2d 850 (D.C.1993).
Cited 10 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics
628 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1980
Cir. 1971); NLRB v. … This does not imply that changed circumstances like those in this case will make a Board order moot. Generally, they will not. See NLRB v. Raytheon Co., 398 U.S. 25 , 90 S.Ct. 1547 , 26 L.Ed.2d 21 (1970); NLRB v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGoya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
298 F. App'x 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008
This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … See Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo y Beneficiencia de P.R. v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 158, 166 (1st Cir.2005); see also Adair Standish Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLocal 1441 v. National Labor Relations Board
326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1964
326 F.2d 663 LOCAL 1441, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, and Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, and Kentuckiana Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing
Cited 0 timesPublishedFinch, Pruyn & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
296 F. App'x 83 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 2008
Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 2 (D.C.Cir. 1988). … Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137, 1141 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Int’l Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir. 1994)). Pursuant to D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Hirsch Lumber Co.
35 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1929
In Thomas & Willis v. Wooldridge, 2 Woods, 667 , 23 Fed. Cas. page 986 , No. 13,918, in which Mr. … L. p. 807, § 37; Henry v. Gold Park Mining Co. (C. C.) 15 F. 649 ; American Bank v. Rollins, 99 Mass. 313 ; American Bank v. Snow, 9 R. I. 11, 98 Am. Dec. 364 ; Burrill v. Letson, 2 Speers (S. C.) 378.
Cited 2 timesPublishedL. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles
140 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1944
Brown, Administrator, v. Wilemon, 5 Cir., 139 F.2d 730 . Act of May 31, 1941, 55 Stat. 236 , which amended the Act of Tune 28, 1940, 54 Stat. 676 . Perkins v. Brown, D.G.,S.D.Ga., 53 F.Supp. 176 . … Wright v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 89 ; Nichols & Co. v. Secretary of Agriculture, 1 Cir., 131 F.2d 651 ; Nelson v. Secretary of Agriculture, 7 Cir., 133 F.2d 453 .
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna