Case law

Public Service Commission v. Panda-Brandywine, L.P.

375 Md. 185 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 10, 2003

The character, credit, and resources of Frederick had been tested and established before the contract was renewed. … Section 292.303(d), dealing with indirect purchases, provides that, “[¿] f a qualifying facility agrees, an electric utility which would otherwise be obligated to purchase energy or capacity from such qualifying facility

Dehn v. Edgecombe

152 Md. App. 657 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 4, 2003

Edgecombe was not qualified to perform a vasectomy, he referred Mr. Dehn to a surgeon, Dr. Samuel F. Mazella, who ultimately performed the vasectomy on October 24, 1995. … In this case [the parent-child immunity] serves to bar an action by the child while living against the father.

Abrams v. State

176 Md. App. 600 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 10, 2007

That Judge Perry clearly explained the nature of the charge of uttering to the defendant. … In response, the State argues that under Maryland law, there is no particular litany required to establish a voluntary and intelligent plea.

Malone v. United States Marshals Service

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 13, 2025

Ordinarily, a plaintiff must establish either diversity jurisdiction or federal question jurisdiction to permit this Court to hear the case. … Plaintiff clearly itemizes her damages at just $622, rendering diversity jurisdiction inapposite.

Pence v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.

363 Md. 267 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 8, 2001

Analysis of the City Loan Under the SMLL In order for the Bank Loan to qualify under the SMLL, there must have been a lien constituting a qualifying prior encumbrance on the title to petitioner’s property. … Thus, even if the loan agreement was sufficiently specific to qualify as a lien under State law, or under a local law if such a local law was authorized by State law, it would only qualify as a lien, if at all, in the future

Cahill v. Mayor of Baltimore

173 Md. 450 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1938

An Act of 1783, ch. 24, providing for the appointment of port wardens “to preserve the navigation of the bason and harbor of Baltimore-town,” qualified the right to build wharves by prohibiting their construction without … The ordinance of 1926 seems clearly enough a provision for the property occupied by the Shipbuilding Corporation.

Koch v. Specialized Care Services, Inc.

437 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 23, 2005

In other circuits, the evidence must “clearly relate” or “reasonably relate” to a possible violation. In re International Systems and Controls Corp. … Deering Milliken Inc., 540 F.2d 1215, 1219 (4th Cir.l976)(upholding attorney work product protection of document drafted by former general house counsel and vice-president of company because "opinion work product immunity

Lowery v. Lowery

113 Md. App. 423 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 30, 1997

which portion of the settlement at issue qualified as marital property. … Lowery failed to meet her burden of proof as to which portion of the settlement qualified as marital property.

Owens v. State

399 Md. 388 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 5, 2007

We pay deference to the trial court’s factual findings, upholding them unless “they are clearly erroneous.” … Under the Article, “[a] person is qualified to serve as a juror unless he [or she]: (1) Is not constitutionally qualified to vote in the county where the court convenes ....” 37 Cts. *416 & Jud. Proc., § 8-207(b)(l).

ARMCO STEEK CORP. v. Dept. of Assess. & Tax.

236 Md. 168 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 28, 1964

The record clearly established and the trial judge found that the profits normally realized by Asarco for each ton of ore refined for others was approximately $1.50. … The history of Section 5 clearly supports the above conclusion. When Section 5 was adopted in the 1949 revision of the City's Charter, it replaced former Section 4 thereof.

Franklin Surety Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

164 Md. 362 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 20, 1933

A bank qualifying as a depository for county funds is required to pay interest on the average daily balance at a rate to be agreed upon, not less than two per cent.; and when more than one bank in a county qualifies as depository … question, whether, given the existence of Liability on the bond, the reinsurance contract, not controlled by the statutes, but only by its own' terms, was likewise extended to cover a loss after January 15th, 1931, seems clearly

In Re Samone H.

385 Md. 282 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 9, 2005

The court also established a permanency plan 5 to *288 have both children live with relatives capable of caring for them. … Protracted proceedings in establishing the initial plan defeat the purpose of the statute.

Curtis v. MacTier

115 Md. 386 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 5, 1911

preservation of peace and order, for the opening, closing, changing, grading and improving of streets, sidewalks and alleys; for process of condemnation where necessary; for street lighting and fire protection; for the establishment … In these respects the title is not only too narrow, but it is clearly- misleading.

Wash. Gas Light Co. v. Md. Pub. Serv. Comm'n

460 Md. 667 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 14, 2018

On May 27, 2015, Chief Judge Romine issued an order, concluding that for “an infrastructure replacement project to be an ‘eligible infrastructure replacement’ under the STRIDE law,” and thus qualifying for accelerated … Clearly, Washington Gas did not discuss using the STRIDE statute with regard to out-of-state infrastructure projects.

Feakes v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 16, 2025

It provides that: A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify … Although Plaintiff has not established each element of spoliation, the Court is troubled by Defendant’s conduct.

YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. Zaleski

386 Md. 654 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 11, 2005

Paul Zaleski, who qualified as personal representative, *662 denied YIVO’s request for payment of the bequest on the basis that Dr. Karski’s earlier gift satisfied the legacy. … Hence, the transfers to the trust did not adeem the testamentary trust established under Mr. Selby’s Will.

Kadan v. Board of Supervisors of Elections

273 Md. 406 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 23, 1974

“Wherever the purpose of the framers of a constitution is clearly expressed, it will be followed by the courts. … There is no justification for retaining, as part of the Constitutionally-established judicial system, a separate Orphans’ Court staffed for the most part by lay judges, sitting perhaps once a week for the purpose of signing

In Re Adoption No. 09598 in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County

77 Md. App. 511 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 4, 1989

During a five-day trial, in addition to establishing Mr. … Evidence further established that Brandon has strong emotional ties with the T.’s.

Salmons v. Dollar General Corp.

989 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 30, 1996

“Unsupported allegations as to motive do not *736 confer talismanic immunity from Rule 56.” Ross, 759 F.2d at 365 . … The employer's burden is further qualified in that it only bears the burden of production, not the burden of persuasion. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v.

Gordon Masciarelli v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 28, 2023

”).2 USPS would be unable to exercise the discretion clearly granted in POM § 126.43 if the guidelines of the Maintenance Handbook were mandatory beyond normal business hours. … the FTCA provides only a “limited waiver” of the federal government’s sovereign immunity.