Case law

State v. Riggs

35 Or. App. 571 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 1978

As will appear, we find the principles of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, applicable in this proceeding. … In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Nicoll v. City of Eugene

53 Or. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1981

See Miles v. City of Eugene, 252 Or 528 , 451 P2d 59 (1969). The definition of 'eligible customer’ in the plan includes a 'person who owns or occupies a residential building * * *.’ … The only point the footnote was intended to make is that, if the plan does benefit companies, corporations or associations as well as natural persons, the holding in Miles v.

In re Taggart

522 B.R. 627 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Dec 16, 2014

Brown, Terry W. … Brown. . An alleged violation of the discharge injunction is pursued, as in this case, by a motion invoking the contempt remedies allowed for in § 105(a). See Walls v.

Morgan v. Sisters School District 6

241 Or. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2011

E.g., Eckles v. … Accord Hinkley v.

Landauer v. State Industrial Accident Commission

175 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1944

E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Ind. Board, 276 Ill. 262 , 114 N. E. 496 ; Haiselden v. Ind. Board, 275 Ill. 114 , 113 N. E. 877 . Kansas: Gen. Stat. 1915, §§ 5896-5942; Pittman v. … Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co., 81 Mont. 36 , 261 P. 616 . (Death case.) New Hampshire: Laws, 1911, Ch. 163; Brown v. Comvay Electric Light and Power Co., 82 N. H. 78, 129 A. 633 . New Jersey: Mahoney v.

Monson v. State

136 Or. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1995

See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984); Sivers v. R & F Capital Corp., 123 Or App 35, 37 , 858 P2d 895 (1993), rev den 318 Or 351 (1994). … See Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Ins.

Cloyd v. Lebanon School District 16C

161 Or. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

Maddox v. Clac. Co. Sch. Dist. No. 25, 293 Or 27 , 643 P2d 1253 (1982); *578 Machunze v. Chemeketa Community College, 106 Or App 707, 709-14 , 810 P2d 406 (1991); Cole v. … Crampton v. Harmon, 20 Or App 676, 683 , 533 P2d 364 (1975).

State v. Kambra

93 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1988

In State v. Marquette, 39 Or App 519 , 592 P2d 1062 (1979), the first prosecution was for assault and the second was for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). After noting that, under Brown v. … It meets none of the criteria that the Brown court used to determine the criminal nature of a DUII charge. Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, 280 Or at 102 .

Cannon v. Farmers' Union Grain Agency

103 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1921

L.; Kyle v. Puppy, 19 Or. 186 ( 25 Pac. 141); Flegel v. Koss, 47 Or. 366, 370 ( 83 Pac. 847 ); Lewis v. Clark, 66 Or. 461, 463 ( 134 Pac. 1194 ); Warren v. Dinwoodie, 88 Or. 342, 344 ( 171 Pac. 1175 ); Bailey v. … Stutz, supra, evidence was admitted showing the proceedings of a school board which were not recorded.

Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University

157 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

Barcik v. Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174, 186 , 859 P2d 765 (1995). The exercise of judicial power requires a concrete controversy that results in a decree that binds parties having adverse legal interests. Brown v. … In Public Employees v.

White v. Employment Division

77 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1985

On review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board which disqualified him from unemployment compensation benefits, petitioner prevailed on the merits in this court. White v. … In discussing ORS 183.495, the companion statute to ORS 183.497, the Supreme Court in Brown v.

Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

170 Or. App. 271 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 2000

Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 500 , 985 P2d 854 , on recons 162 Or App 527 , 986 P2d 666 (1999). … Petitioner, however, raised the issue of whether the Board misconstrued ORS 279.015. See Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc., 328 Or 487, 500-01 , 982 P2d 1117 (1999); Stull v.

Hurlburt v. Morris

68 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913

Brown, were paid to him. … Rep. 501); Kilbourn v. Sunderland, 130 U. S. 505, 514 ( 32 L. Ed. 1005 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 594); Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U. S. 461, 478, 481 ( 45 L. Ed. 1183 , 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 845).

Brady v. East Portland Sheet Metal Works

222 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

The agreed commission for performance by plaintiff was that provided by Portland Eealty Board rules. … This procedure is pursuant to the holding in Brown v. Bonesteele, 218 Or 312 , 344 P2d 928 .

Thielsen v. Linde

127 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1927

Co. v. Spillman, 23 Or. 587 ( 32 Pac. 688 ), and authorities there cited. … Brown, J., concurs. Rossman, J., concurs in the result. Coshow, J., did not participate in this opinion.

State v. Flores

58 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1982

New York v. … Both the brown paper bag and the box were open containers and were subject to search as part of the search of the car incident to defendant’s arrest. Cf. United States v.

Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co.

142 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1933

Potter v. Shields, 174 Mich. 121 ( 140 N. W. 500 ); Fruit Dispatch Co. v. C. C. Taft Co., 197 Iowa 409 ( 197 N. W. 302 ); Seefus v. DeVaughn, 108 Neb. 628 ( 188 N. W. 235 ); Leonard Seed Co. v. … Dollen & Sons v. Carl R. Miller Tractor Co., 241 N. W. 307; Tamkin v. Nelson-Dowling Coal Co., 82 N. H. 96 ( 130 Atl. 26 ); Smith v. Bank of State Riley Ch. (S. C.) 152; Habersham v. Rodrigues, 1 Speers (S.

Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.

106 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1923

Edmunson, 87 Or. 476, 487 ( 171 Pac. 186 ); Cathcart v. Marshfield, 89 Or. 401 ( 174 Pac. 138 ); Duniway v. Hadley, 91 Or. 343, 346 ( 178 Pac. 942 ); State v. … v.

Moro v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2015

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD; Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General; and Kate Brown, Governor, Respondents. … Arlington County Board v. Richards, 434 US 5, 7, 98 S Ct 24, 54 L Ed 2d 4 (1977).

State v. Evans

236 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 2010

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … Under O’Key and Brown , “scientific evidence” is admissible if it is relevant under OEC 401, helpful to the trier of fact under OEC 702, 1 and not subject to exclusion under OEC 403. In State v.