Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.96s
Brink's, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
466 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1979
Defendant, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), is a federal body also organized under the Federal Reserve Act and is charged with administering the nation’s monetary policy. 6. … As set forth in Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v.
Cited 2 timesPublished312 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1962
BROWN and Aaron A. Paulson, Appellants, v. Walter N. TOBRINER et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellees. 2501-03 FOURTEENTH STREET COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Walter N. … Brown and Paulson, along with their wives and a third party, were its founders. Brown's wife and Paulson were its first President and Secretary, respectively.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAerovias De Mexico, S.A. De C v. v. National Mediation Board
211 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2002
Clerks v. … See Herbert v.
Cited 2 timesPublished42 App. D.C. 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1914
Brown v. Lane, 40 App. D. C. 533. … Reagan v. United States, 182 U. S. 419 , 45 L. ed. 1162, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842; Shurtleff v. United States, 189 U. S. 311 , 47 L. ed. 828, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 535; Ham v. Board of Police, 142 Mass. 90 , 7 N.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRichard D. Peterson v. Hugh F. Rivers, D.C. Board of Parole
350 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1965
After our decision in Richardson v. … It would take an extraordinary case indeed to lead the courts to become embroiled in Parole Board actions on the basis of claims lacking a constitutional foundation. Affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAmerican Importers Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board
495 F.2d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1974
opinion of November 29, 1972, American Importers Ass’n v. … Upon consideration of the foregoing the order of the Board approving the agreement, as conditioned by the Board, is Affirmed. 1 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedWaremart Foods v. National Labor Relations Board
354 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 2004
Unless California law is what the Board says it is, this case is indistinguishable from Lechmere and the Board’s decision is in error. See ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1000–03 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), a state law prohibited but then ‘‘dismissed review’’ without deciding the case. See CALI- FORNIA RULES OF COURT § 976(d); Stephen R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUniversity of the District of Columbia Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees
994 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 1998
actions. 6 The Control Board relies most heavily on the United States District Court’s opinion in Shook v. … United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95 , 18 S.Ct. 3 , 42 L.Ed. 394 (1897); *6 Halverson v. Slater, 129 F.3d 180 (D.C.Cir.1997).
Cited 11 timesPublishedInternational Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
383 F.2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 1967
Stevens and Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 F.2d 292 , decided July 7, 1967.) … B. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedPost Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
331 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 2009
The employer contends the Board’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. In accord with our “highly deferential” standard of review, Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., v. … relationship,” NLRB v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAOTOP, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
331 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2003
Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 264–65 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citations and quotations omitted). … See Colquest Energy, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHines v. Federal Aviation Administration
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2024
Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Baptist Homes of the West v. National Labor Relations Board
858 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 2017
Co. v. FCC, 129 F.3d 625, 629 (D.C. … Power v. FERC, 493 F.3d 239, 268 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. DOT, 137 F.3d 640, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFreund Baking Company v. National Labor Relations Board
165 F.3d 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1999
P 10,356 FREUND BAKING COMPANY, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. … See Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 741 , 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983). In support of this argument, the Board points to NAACP v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarris v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 2023
Houlahan v. 5 Brown, 979 F. Supp. 2d 86, 88 (D.D.C. 2013) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … See, e.g., Brown v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. (“Amtrak”), No. 18-CV-02216 (APM), 2018 WL 11217191, at *1 (D.D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished49 A.3d 1219 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2012
Co. v. Niziolek, 395 Mass. 737 , 481 N.E.2d 1356 (1985). … Reverend Brown observed that, prior to his conviction, Mr.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDonald J. Hatch v. District of Columbia,appellees
184 F.3d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 1999
See Brown v. Plant, 131 F.3d 163, 170 (D.C.Cir.1997) (identifying “a number of unsettled questions about how to apply Sandin”). … Blankenship, 100 F.3d 640 , 642 (8th Cir.1996); Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156, 1160 (1st Cir.1996). We too faced this issue in Brown v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedShinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
164 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016
Brown v. … [and] sharpen[s] the issues to be litigated,” Brown v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedCommercial Solvents Corp. v. Mellon
277 F. 548 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922
The decisions chiefly relied upon are United States v. United Verde Co., 196 U. S. 207 , 25 Sup. Ct. 222, 49 L. Ed. 449 ; Waite v. Macy, 246 U. S. 606 , 38 Sup. Ct. 395, 62 L. Ed. 892 ; Macy v. Browne (D. … C.) 215 Fed. 456 ; and Macy v. Browne, 224 Fed. 359 , 140 C. C. A. 45 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. R. J. Smith Construction Co., Inc.
545 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1976
Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 480 F.2d 1186 (1973). … Barton Brands, Ltd. v. NLRB, 529 F.2d 793 (7 Cir. 1976); NLRB v. Cast-A-Stone Products Company, 479 F.2d 396 (4 Cir. 1973). See also United States v.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna