Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.96s

  • Brink's, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    466 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1979

    Defendant, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), is a federal body also organized under the Federal Reserve Act and is charged with administering the nation’s monetary policy. 6. … As set forth in Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bernard S. Brown and Aaron A. Paulson v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 2501-03 Fourteenth Street Cooperative Association v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia

    312 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1962

    BROWN and Aaron A. Paulson, Appellants, v. Walter N. TOBRINER et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellees. 2501-03 FOURTEENTH STREET COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Walter N. … Brown and Paulson, along with their wives and a third party, were its founders. Brown's wife and Paulson were its first President and Secretary, respectively.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Aerovias De Mexico, S.A. De C v. v. National Mediation Board

    211 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2002

    Clerks v. … See Herbert v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kalbfus v. Siddons

    42 App. D.C. 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1914

    Brown v. Lane, 40 App. D. C. 533. … Reagan v. United States, 182 U. S. 419 , 45 L. ed. 1162, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842; Shurtleff v. United States, 189 U. S. 311 , 47 L. ed. 828, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 535; Ham v. Board of Police, 142 Mass. 90 , 7 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Richard D. Peterson v. Hugh F. Rivers, D.C. Board of Parole

    350 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1965

    After our decision in Richardson v. … It would take an extraordinary case indeed to lead the courts to become embroiled in Parole Board actions on the basis of claims lacking a constitutional foundation. Affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Importers Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    495 F.2d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1974

    opinion of November 29, 1972, American Importers Ass’n v. … Upon consideration of the foregoing the order of the Board approving the agreement, as conditioned by the Board, is Affirmed. 1 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waremart Foods v. National Labor Relations Board

    354 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 2004

    Unless California law is what the Board says it is, this case is indistinguishable from Lechmere and the Board’s decision is in error. See ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1000–03 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), a state law prohibited but then ‘‘dismissed review’’ without deciding the case. See CALI- FORNIA RULES OF COURT § 976(d); Stephen R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • University of the District of Columbia Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

    994 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 1998

    actions. 6 The Control Board relies most heavily on the United States District Court’s opinion in Shook v. … United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95 , 18 S.Ct. 3 , 42 L.Ed. 394 (1897); *6 Halverson v. Slater, 129 F.3d 180 (D.C.Cir.1997).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    383 F.2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 1967

    Stevens and Co. v. N. L. R. B., 380 F.2d 292 , decided July 7, 1967.) … B. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    331 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 2009

    The employer contends the Board’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. In accord with our “highly deferential” standard of review, Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., v. … relationship,” NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • AOTOP, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    331 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2003

    Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 264–65 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citations and quotations omitted). … See Colquest Energy, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Federal Aviation Administration

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2024

    Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Baptist Homes of the West v. National Labor Relations Board

    858 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 2017

    Co. v. FCC, 129 F.3d 625, 629 (D.C. … Power v. FERC, 493 F.3d 239, 268 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. DOT, 137 F.3d 640, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1998).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Freund Baking Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    165 F.3d 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1999

    P 10,356 FREUND BAKING COMPANY, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. … See Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 741 , 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983). In support of this argument, the Board points to NAACP v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 2023

    Houlahan v. 5 Brown, 979 F. Supp. 2d 86, 88 (D.D.C. 2013) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … See, e.g., Brown v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. (“Amtrak”), No. 18-CV-02216 (APM), 2018 WL 11217191, at *1 (D.D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Sabo

    49 A.3d 1219 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2012

    Co. v. Niziolek, 395 Mass. 737 , 481 N.E.2d 1356 (1985). … Reverend Brown observed that, prior to his conviction, Mr.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Donald J. Hatch v. District of Columbia,appellees

    184 F.3d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 1999

    See Brown v. Plant, 131 F.3d 163, 170 (D.C.Cir.1997) (identifying “a number of unsettled questions about how to apply Sandin”). … Blankenship, 100 F.3d 640 , 642 (8th Cir.1996); Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156, 1160 (1st Cir.1996). We too faced this issue in Brown v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

    164 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2016

    Brown v. … [and] sharpen[s] the issues to be litigated,” Brown v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Commercial Solvents Corp. v. Mellon

    277 F. 548 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922

    The decisions chiefly relied upon are United States v. United Verde Co., 196 U. S. 207 , 25 Sup. Ct. 222, 49 L. Ed. 449 ; Waite v. Macy, 246 U. S. 606 , 38 Sup. Ct. 395, 62 L. Ed. 892 ; Macy v. Browne (D. … C.) 215 Fed. 456 ; and Macy v. Browne, 224 Fed. 359 , 140 C. C. A. 45 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. R. J. Smith Construction Co., Inc.

    545 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1976

    Eng. v. NLRB, 156 U.S.App.D.C. 294 , 480 F.2d 1186 (1973). … Barton Brands, Ltd. v. NLRB, 529 F.2d 793 (7 Cir. 1976); NLRB v. Cast-A-Stone Products Company, 479 F.2d 396 (4 Cir. 1973). See also United States v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.