Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1851

10,000+ results

2.72s

  • Florine Ching v. Ofc. Neal Walsh

    73 F.4th 617 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 13, 2023

    In a § 1983 action, an officer is entitled to qualified immunity unless: (1) the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right, and (2) that right was clearly established. Manning v. … Because, after Jordan posed a threat to Walsh, it was not clearly established that Walsh’s continuous shooting, which lasted less than two seconds, violated a constitutional right, Walsh is entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Showalter v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety

    183 N.C. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2007

    Defendants argue the trial court erred in concluding that Trooper Emmons was not entitled to qualified immunity because the right which plaintiff alleges to have been violated was not clearly established at the time and because … The defense of qualified immunity shields government officials from personal liability “ ‘insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • G.M. ex rel. B.M. v. Casalduc

    982 F. Supp. 2d 1235 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Nov 4, 2013

    When a defendant asserts qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that: (1) the defendant violated a constitutional right, and (2) the constitutional right was clearly established … with police assistance is not clearly established).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • July v. Penzone

    District Court, D. Arizona · Apr 5, 2021

    complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 7 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which 8 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Lockyer, 568 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th 23 Cir. 2009) (finding defendants entitled to qualified immunity because “[violations of] state 24 departmental regulations do not establish a federal constitutional violation”). 25

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kostic v. Texas A & M University at Commerce

    11 F. Supp. 3d 699 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Mar 31, 2014

    Qualified Immunity “Qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … Even if the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation, a defendant will still be entitled to qualified immunity if the defendant’s conduct was “objectively reasonable in light of ‘clearly established

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. Kramer

    178 F. Supp. 3d 999 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 15, 2016

    The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability where “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … O’Neill held that,'under circumstances substantially identical to those asserted here, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on the ground that law was not “clearly established” that inmates have a constitution right

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Corrs.

    785 So. 2d 803 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 2001

    The defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the beginning of discovery if the plaintiff's allegations do not state a claim of violation of clearly established law. … If the court determines that the law was clearly established at the time the action occurred, the Harlow analysis requires the public official claiming immunity to show that, because of extraordinary circumstances, "he neither

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Patrick Russell v. Jocelyn Lumitap

    31 F.4th 729 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 13, 2022

    , but instead argued that they were entitled to qualified immunity because they did not violate Russell’s clearly established constitutional rights on the record taken in the light most favorable to Russell. … An officer is entitled to qualified immunity unless the unlawfulness of his conduct was clearly established at the time that he acted,40 and the law at the time that the defendants acted was different than it is now.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Bearman v. California Medical Board

    176 Cal. App. 4th 1588 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 2009

    In determining whether supervisor has qualified immunity, we “undertake a two-step analysis: ‘(1) Was the law governing the official’s conduct clearly established? … To avoid the qualified immunity defense, appellant must show that supervisor’s conduct “violate[d] clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [Citations.]”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Slade v. Vernon

    110 N.C. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1993

    The sole question upon review is whether the trial court erred in denying defendants’ summary judgment motion based upon public officers’ immunity, governmental immunity and qualified immunity. … In general, qualified immunity protects public officials from personal liability for performing discretionary functions insofar as their conduct does not violate “ ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Harmon v. Dall. Cnty.

    294 F. Supp. 3d 548 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 20, 2018

    In analyzing qualified immunity claims, the Supreme Court has "repeatedly told courts...to not define clearly established law at a high level of generality." Mullenix v. … In analyzing qualified immunity claims, the Supreme Court has "repeatedly told courts … to not define clearly established law at a high level of generality." Mullenix v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Basinski v. City of New York

    192 F. Supp. 3d 360 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 2016

    “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields public officials performing discretionary functions from civil liability insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … In addition, in order to be “clearly established” for the purposes of a qualified immunity analysis, “the contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wood v. City of Alamogordo

    8 N.M. Ct. App. 43 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2015

    Qualified Immunity, Clearly Established Law, and Trujillo 2 {7} We begin by addressing Wood’s argument that the district court erred in 3 concluding he failed to establish that Trujillo violated clearly established … New Mexico Board of Examiners of Optometry to argue 10 that Trujillo violated clearly established law and is therefore not entitled to qualified 11 immunity. 1979-NMSC-005, 92 N.M. 414, 589 P.2d 198.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rooks v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

    64 O.B.A.J. 39 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1992

    The presumption of immunity is in favor of the government officials and is not overcome unless it is shown that they violated clearly established law or constitutional rights of which the reasonable official should have known … There is a presumption of qualified immunity unless it is shown that the official’s conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights. McLin v. Trimble, supra, at 1041 , citing Mitchell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • B.R. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau for Children and Families, and Child Protective Services

    Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · Feb 8, 2024

    is necessary to defeat the defense of qualified immunity. … Code § 49-6A-9, which would overcome qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Belizaire v. City of Miami

    944 F. Supp. 2d 1204 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 16, 2013

    Belizaire has failed to satisfy her burden of alleging the violation of a clearly established constitutional right, the Court finds that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity. First, Ms. … Belizaire fails to allege the violation of a clearly established right, Expósito is entitled to qualified immunity. See Bailey v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jimerson v. Lewis

    94 F.4th 423 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 1, 2024

    Indeed, it is useful to divide this second component of qualified immunity into two questions: “whether the allegedly violated constitutional rights were clearly established at the time of the incident; and, if so … established law for qualified immunity analysis.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Montelongo v. City of Modesto

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 15, 2021

    Qualified Immunity 22 Qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability where a reasonable officer would 23 not have known that his conduct violated a clearly established right. … established law.”). 24 Officer Wallace is not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity 25 because, as established previously, there is a material issue of fact as to whether Officer Wallace 26

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christopher Sandknop v. Brian O'Connell

    932 F.3d 739 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 5, 2019

    Dismissing a case on a 12(b)(6) motion for reasons of qualified immunity is appropriate when the “immunity is established on the face of the complaint.” Ulrich v. … An official is entitled to the affirmative defense of qualified immunity “unless the evidence establishes (1) that a plaintiff’s constitutional rights have been violated, and (2) those rights were so clearly established at

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Billie Taylor

    West Virginia Supreme Court · May 2, 2023

    Furthermore, the circuit court found questions of fact existed about qualified immunity, namely whether DOCR violated clearly established rights of the respondent about which a reasonable person would have known, or acted … When weighing the evidence regarding qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage, a court is guided by the following standard: The ultimate determination of whether qualified or statutory immunity bars

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.