Case law

White v. Employment Division

77 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1985

On review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board which disqualified him from unemployment compensation benefits, petitioner prevailed on the merits in this court. White v. … In discussing ORS 183.495, the companion statute to ORS 183.497, the Supreme Court in Brown v.

Payne v. Department of Commerce, Building Codes Division

62 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 1883

Petitioner Employment Relations Board (ERB) seeks Supreme Court review of our decision in this case, Payne v. … Sunshine Dairy v. Peterson, 183 Or 305 , 193 P2d 543 (1948); Clackamas County v. LCDC, supra.

Laro Lumber Co., Inc. v. Patrick

52 Or. App. 1035 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

Broadcast, v. … Pendleton Grain Gr. v. Sunbest Corp., 271 Or 48, 54 , 530 P2d 82 (1975); see Brown v. Portland School District # 1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981).

State v. Claypool

145 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1934

There must be deception and change of conduct in consequence, in order to estop a party from showing the truth. 2 Story’s Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 1543; People v. Brown, 67 Ill. 435 . … Swift v. Board of Com’rs of Hennepin County, 76 Minn. 194 ( 78 N. W. 1107 ).

State v. Colman-Pinning

302 Or. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2020

Brown, 301 Or at 276; State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 200-01, 390 P3d 992 (2017). … See State v.

Moro v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2015

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD; Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General; and Kate Brown, Governor, Respondents. … Arlington County Board v. Richards, 434 US 5, 7, 98 S Ct 24, 54 L Ed 2d 4 (1977).

Schoren v. Schoren

110 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1924

BROWN, J. 1. The appeal in this case having been taken from the whole of the decree, we are required to try this suit anew, “upon the transcript and evidence accompanying it.” Or. L., § 556. Also see Or. L., § 405. … In his counterclaim for a divorce he again avers that he owns and maintains a home at 320 East Second Street, Dalles City, and that his wife, without cause, “left the defendant’s bed and board and moved to rooms on the second

Washington Investment Ass'n v. Stanley

38 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1901

Co. v. Whithed, 2 N. Dak. 82 ( 49 N. W. 318 ): Butler v. Mutual Aid Co., 94 Ga. 562 ( 20 S. E. 101 ); State v. Building Assoc., 35 Ohio St. 258 ; Bates v. Peoples’ Assoc., 42 Ohio St. 655 ; Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. … - resolution of the board o-f directors of the association.

Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University

157 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

Barcik v. Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174, 186 , 859 P2d 765 (1995). The exercise of judicial power requires a concrete controversy that results in a decree that binds parties having adverse legal interests. Brown v. … In Public Employees v.

State v. Sanchez

14 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

For double jeopardy purposes, State v. … State v. Brown, supra, requires that separate charges arising from the same transaction be joined for trial. Brown did not elaborate on what constitutes a transaction for this purpose.

Goldsmith v. The Revenue Cutter

6 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

(Briggs v. Light Boats, 11 Allen, 157 .) … In the ease of United States v.

Josephi v. Furnish

27 Or. 260 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1895

See Tichenor v. Coggins, 8 Or. 270 . 2. … Rep. 30 ); Winchester Manufacturing Company v. Creary, 116 U. S. 166 (6 Sup. Ct. 369); Turner v. Hardin, 80 Iowa, 691 ( 45 N. W. 758 ); State v. Fitzhugh, 2 Or. 234 . 4.

Thompson Optical Institute v. Thompson

119 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1925

BROWN, J. Robert A. Thompson, defendant herein, R. A. Thompson, and Dr. Thompson are one and the same person. *255 The defendant, by his counsel, has carried on a vigorous defense to plaintiff’s suit. … . *263 In Thorn v.

Houghton & Palmer v. Beck

9 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

(Kelly v. Barnett, 16 How. Pr. R., 135; Fairchild v. Gwynne, 9 Abb. Pr., 23 .) … (Ross v. Hamilton, 3 Barb., 610 ; Blake v. Graves, et al., 18 Iowa, 313 .)

Thorsen v. Hooper

57 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1910

A devise to an executor, coupled with a power to sell real property for any specified purpose without an order of court, creates a trust: Brown v. Brown, 7 Or. 285 . 3. … Brown, 72 Tex. 505 ( 10 S. W. 571 : 13 Am. St. Rep. 823 ) ; Holden v. Piper, 5 Colo. App. 71 ( 37 Pac. 34 .)

Mitchell v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jul 15, 2014

MITCHELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) TC-MD 140161C ) v. … Jeff Brown and Michael Watson appeared on behalf of Defendant. Jeff Brown testified on behalf of Defendant. No exhibits were received from either party. I.

State v. Dulfu

282 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2016

Brown, 297 Or at 417 . … In Orchard v.

City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

61 Or. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1982

ORS 174.020; 5 Thompson v. IDS Life Ins. Co., 274 Or 649 , 549 P2d 510 (1976). … Gaudry v. Bureau of Labor & Ind., 48 Or App 589, 593 , 617 P2d 668 (1980).

Antin v. Union High School District No. 2

130 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1929

Rep. 1286, 1290); Walsh v. Trustees of New York & Brooklyn Bridge, 96 N. Y. 427 ; Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196 ( 137 N. E. 24 , 24 A. L. R. 1065); Donovan v. McAlpine, *473 85 N. Y. 185 ( 39 Am. … Brown, J., did not participate.

United States v. Aho

51 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 2, 1943

State Land Board v. Davidson, 147 Or. 504 , 34 P.2d 608 . The fact of sovereignty is not permitted to relieve the entity of obligations of this type as proprietor in a drainage district. … Kendall v. Mohler, 115 Or. 562, 576 , 237 P. 690 , 239 P. 193 . Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, 290 U.S. 89 , 15 S.Ct. 38 , 78 L.Ed. 192 ; Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441 , *140 16 P. 971 ; Beezley v.