Case law

McLaughlin v. HOWELL TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

210 N.J. 27 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 29, 2012

40 A.3d 58 (2012) 210 N.J. 27 McLAUGHLIN v. HOWELL TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. C-788 September Term 2011, 069621 Supreme Court of New Jersey. March 29, 2012. Petition for Certification Denied.

French v. Board of Commissioners of Ocean City

136 N.J.L. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 1947

McNeely v. Woodruff, 13 N. J. L. 352: Eldridge v. Philadelphia and Reading Railway Co., 80 Id. 478; Kuberski v. Hausser *60 mann, 113 Id. 162; Hartman v. … Board of Chosen Freeholders, 127 Id. 170; In re Huyler, 133 Id. 171. If the provisions of the later and prior acts are reconcilable, effect must be given to both in their resjiective spheres.

BROWN v. SAWYER

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 18, 2021

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 … (1994) (citing Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 … (1981)).

Town of Morristown v. Morris County Board of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 25, 2024

Willingboro Twp. v. Burlington County Board, 62 N.J. 203, 222 (1973). … Cashin v. Bello, 223 N.J. 328, 335 (2015) (quoting O’Connell v.

Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)

230 N.J. 84 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2017

Brown v. State, 442 N.J.Super. 406, 410-11 , 124 A.3d 243 (App. Div. 2015). … V.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Schmidt

83 N.J. Eq. 35 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 6, 1914

State v. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co., 79 N. J. Eq. 32. In State v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 68 N. J. … In Rex v. Neil, 2 C. & P. 485, in a passage quoted in 1 Russ.

Wright v. Board of Educ. of City of East Orange

99 N.J. 112 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1985

In re IFPTE Local 195 v. State, 88 N.J. 393, 401 (1982); accord Ridgefield Park Educ. Ass’n v. Ridgefield Park Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 144, 162 (1978); State v. State Supervisory Employees Ass’n, 78 N.J. 54, 79-80 (1978). … The Board insists that this matter is controlled by our conclusion in Spiewak v.

Price v. Excise Board of Town of Millburn

29 N.J. Super. 103 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1953

Bumball v. Burnett, 115 N.J.L. 254 ( Sup. Ct. 1935); Zicherman v. Driscoll, 133 N.J.L. 586 ( Sup. Ct. 1946); *108 Biscamp v. Township of Teaneck, 5 N.J. Super. 172 ( App. Div. 1949). Cf. Ring v. … Bumball v. Burnett, supra ; Biscamp v. Teaneck, supra; Ring v. North Arlington, supra.

Dalton v. OCEAN TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

126 N.J. 324 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1991

126 N.J. 324 (1991) 598 A.2d 878 DALTON v. OCEAN TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT The Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 2, 1991. Petitions for Certification Denied. 245 N.J. Super. 453 586 A.2d 262

Bergen & Dundee Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

74 N.J.L. 742 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

The Supreme Court affirmed the tax on the authority of the opinion of Chief Justice Gummere in Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, ante p. 1. … The scheme of taxation thus established was upheld as constitutional by this court in State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., 19 Vroom 146 .

Nuckel v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BOARD

203 N.J. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 2010

3 A.3d 1227 (2010) 203 N.J. 437 NUCKEL v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY PLANNING BOARD. Nos. C-37 September Term 2010, 066096 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 10, 2010. Petition for Certification Granted.

Adams v. Board of Education

83 N.J.L. 489 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1912

Updike v. Ten Broeck, 3 Vroom 105 . … The case of Wells v. Stackhouse, 2 Id. 356, is explained on the ground of ladies and in the later case of Ferguson v.

NJ State Bd. of Optometrists v. Koenigsberg

33 N.J. Super. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1954

New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S.S. Kresge Co., 113 N.J.L. 287 ( Sup. Ct. 1934), modified 115 N.J.L. 495 ( E. & A. 1935); Abelson's, Inc., v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412 (1950). … New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S.S. Kresge Co., supra, 113 N.J.L. 287, 294 ( Sup. Ct. 1934).

GF Princeton, LLC v. Ewing Township Planning Board

201 N.J. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 24, 2010

Puleio v. North Brunswick Township Board of Adjustment

375 N.J. Super. 613 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 2005

Plaintiff contends that pursuant to Industrial Lessors, Inc. v. … Basralian, supra, 319 N.J.Super. at 207 , 725 A.2d 64 (quoting Elco v. R.C. Maxwell Co., 292 N.J.Super. 118, 126 , 678 A.2d 323 (App.Div.1996)); See Also Kohl v.

O'Neill v. Township of Tewksbury Land Use Board

12 A.3d 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 2011

12 A.3d 213 (2011) O'NEILL v. TOWNSHIP OF TEWKSBURY LAND USE BOARD. Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 27, 2011. Petition for Certification Denied.

TP. OF LAFAYETTE v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

208 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1986

THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX; EDMUND J. ZUKOWSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD; JAMES J. … Schear v. Elizabeth, 41 N.J. 321, 326 (1964).

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 12, 1915

The fallacy of tire argument lies in the assumption that section 22 confers upon the board judicial power to regulate conflicting easements. There is no such power conferred. … Tt is quite obvious that it would be of no practical value to make regulations regarding such matters unless the board entrusted uith the care of the subject had power to give effect' to such regulations.

Franklin Banks v. Simpkins

88 N.J. Eq. 1 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 20, 1917

It got so high that he found he could drain some water through the auxiliary ditch into the bog of Brown and then removed two boards from the gates into Brown’s bog'. … Earl v. De Hart and Bailey v. Schnitzius embody the settled law of this state on this subject.

George W. Shaner & Sons v. Board of Education

6 N.J. Misc. 671 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1928

It would subordinate the board of education, which is an independent corporation, to the municipal body. It would make the members of the board of education manikins to be controlled by the action of the city. … This, we do not think, as we have intimated, was the scheme of the legislature appertaining to a board of education. In many instances the members of board of education are elected.