Case law

Opinion No. 68-263 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1968

be deemed a Certified Shorthand Reporter, eligible for official appointment under Section No. 6, of this Act, and entitled to use the abbreviation `C.S.R.' after his name, and without extra charge shall receive from the Board … Brown v. State, 209 P.2d 715 , 89 Okl.Cr. 443 . There is no inherent or pre-existing power to punish for contempt beyond that which the courts possess.

Gordon v. Bright

306 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1968

Seebach v. Cullen, 338 F.2d 663 , cert. denied, 380 U.S. 972 , 85 S.Ct. 1331 , 14 L.Ed.2d 268 ; Brown v. Zuckert, 349 F.2d 461 , cert. denied 382 U.S. 998 , 86 S.Ct. 588 , 15 L.Ed.2d 486 ; Bailey v. … McTiernan v. Gronouski, 337 F.2d 31 ; Seebach v. Cullen, supra; Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85 , 243 F.2d 29 , cert. denied 353 U.S. 970 , 77 S.Ct. 1060 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1137 .

Gungoll v. Elsberry

177 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1936

Brooks v. Tucker, 89 Okla. 255 , 201 P. 643 ; Atkinson v. King, 93 Okla. 37 , 219 P. 914 ; National Bond & Inv. Co. v. Central Nat. Bank, 142 Okla. 96 , 285 P. 828 . The Gungolls urge that they are bona fide purchasers. … until after acouiring the lease from Brown. Plaintiff offered no evidence, and there is none otherwise, to refute the foregoing facts. In Davis v.

Red Bird v. Berry

371 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 17, 1973

State Executive Committee of Democratic Party (D.C.Ga.), 288 F.Supp. 371 ; Rodriguez v. Brown (D.C.Tex.), 299 F.Supp. 479 , supp.op. 300 F.Supp. 737 ; McMichen v. … Ellington (D.C.Tenn.), 309 F.Supp. 89 (by implication); Cholmakjian v. Board of Trustees (D.C.Mich.), 315 F.Supp. 1335 . Seventh Circuit—Landry v. Daley (D.C.Ill.), 288 F.Supp. 194 ; Napolitano v.

McCarty v. State

765 P.2d 1215 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1988

See Brown, 785 F.2d at 1463 ; Troedel v. Wainwright, 667 F.Supp. 1456, 1458 (S.D.Fla.1986). … See Brown v. State, 753 P.2d 908, 913 (Okla.Crim.App.1988). See also Brown, 753 P.2d at 914 (Bussey, J., Specially Concurring).

Choctaw County v. Bateman

208 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1952

Swift & Co. v. Brown, 202 Okla. 572 , 216 P. 2d 294 . We have noticed the cases from other jurisdictions treating of the evidence required to sustain a finding as to the disability. Among them are: Woods v. W. E. … Swift & Co. v. Brown, supra. In Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Montgomery, 148 Okla. 145 , 297 P. 240 , the evidence to sustain a finding that hernia resulted from strain was in question.

Ex Parte Dagley

35 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1912

Dagley before the insanity board. It is then charged that the husband of Mrs. … Rep. 545 ; People v. Baker, 59 Misc. Rep. 359 , 110 N. Y. Supp. 848 ; In re Brown, 39 Wash. 160 , 81 Pac. 552 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 540, 109 Am. St. Rep. 868 , 4 Ann. Cas. 488; State v.

Duncan v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

75 O.B.A.J. 1893 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 2004

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1984 OK CIV APP 58 , 1121, 696 P.2d 1046, 1050 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Lovett, supra note 8 , 328 U.S. at 315 , 66 S.Ct. at 1079 ; Brown, supra note 9 , 381 U.S. at 447 , 85 S.Ct. at 1714 ; Cooper v. Henslee, 257 Ark. 963 , 522 S.W.2d 391, 400 (1975)(Fogleman, J., concurring). .

VANGUARD ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. v. Curler

190 P.3d 1158 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2008

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. U.S., 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 224 , 113 S.Ct. 2578, 2589 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

Privett v. Bd. of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Anderson v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 ; Huntington et al. v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 385 ; Zeigler v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. … Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 ; Hamilton et al. v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 386 ; Russell v. Board of Comm issioners, ante, 144 Pac. 580 ; Walker v.

Harper County Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

192 Okla. 701 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1943

This is an appeal by Harper County, Okla., Excise Board against Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company from an order of the Court of Tax Review entered on the 23rd day of December, 1942. … The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Harper County Excise Board v. Phillips Pipe Line Co., 192 Okla. 700 , 140 P. 2d 596 , this day decided, and the syllabus in that cause is adopted as the syllabus herein.

WINHAM v. REESE

392 P.3d 715 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 2017

Carmichael v. Better, 1996 OK 48 , 914 P.2d 1051 . Issues of law are reviewed pursuant to the de novo standard of review. Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, n.1 , 935 P.2d 319 . … The plaintiffs expert was a board-certified physician whose practice consisted of a majority of patients age 65 or older and periodically provided medical care to nursing home residents.

Opinion No. 78-199 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 1978

Gammill v. Shacklesford, 40 P.2d 920 , 922 (Okl. 1970); Brown v. State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 , 144 (Okl. 1962). … Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Company, 201 Okl. 537 , 207 P.2d 301 (1949).

Young v. Severy, Assignee

5 Okla. 630 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

Severy, applied to the said board of trustees in compliance with the rules providing for the regulation of proceedings of the said board for a title to the said lots, and complied with the regulations and rules of said board … Co. v. Duffy, 2 Kan. 347 ; Polster v. Rucker, 16 Kan. 115 ; Moody v. Arthur, id . 419; Reeve v. Downs, 22 Kan. 330 ; Grandstaff v. Brown, 23 Kan. 176 ; Clay v. Hildebrand, 34 Kan. 694 , 9 P. 466 ; Schenk v.

Smith v. State

486 P.2d 744 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1971

When the prisoner has served the minimum sentence imposed . . . the Pardon and Parole Board shall hear the prisoner’s application for parole.” … Paul v. State, Okl.Cr. A-15277, 1-6-71; v. 42 OBJ p. 53.

Newhouse v. Alexander

27 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1909

In Kirkpatrick v. Board of Can., etc., 53 W. Va. 275 , 44 S. … McDowell, 83 Cal. 70 , 23 Pac. 183 ; Sego v. Stoddard, 136 Ind. 297 , 36 N. E. 204 , 22 L. R. A. 468; Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer, 125 Ill. 141 , 17 N. E. 232 [ 8 Am. St. Rep. 349 ].” In Mauck v. Brown, 59 Neb. 382 , 81 N.

McLaurin v. People's State Bank

95 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

Co. v. School Board of School Dist. … . & Lighting Co., 34 Okla. 730 , 126 Pac. 1025 ; Cunningham v. Cromley, 54 Okla. 266 , 153 Pac. 860 ; Brown v. Goulding, 55 Okla. 320 , 155 Pac. 559 ; Pinkston et al. v. Marlow, 58 Okla. 280 , 159 Pac. 488 ; M., K. & T.

Sanders v. State

43 Okla. Crim. 69 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 11, 1929

Tomlinson v. State, 27 Okla. Cr. 429 , 228 Pac. 608 ; Wertzberger v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 1 , 218 Pac. 721 ; Hamilton et al. v. State, 25 Okla. Cr. 238 , 219 Pac. 951 . In Hamilton et al. v. … In Bohannan v. State, 25 Okla.

Skadal v. McIntosh County Board of County Commissioners

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2025

Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc., 336 F.3d 1194, 1201 (10th Cir. 2003) (quoting Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc., 104 F.3d 1215, 1224 (10th Cir. 1997)). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

Dye v. McIntosh County Board of County Commissioners

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2025

Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc., 336 F.3d 1194, 1201 (10th Cir. 2003) (quoting Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc., 104 F.3d 1215, 1224 (10th Cir. 1997)). … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).