Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
4.61s
Waterville Homes, Inc. v. Municipal Officers of Waterville
589 A.2d 458 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 18, 1991
Lyons v. Board of Directors of School Administrative District No. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 236 (Me.1986). There is no statutory provision authorizing the review of defendant’s action. … See Lyons, 503 A.2d at 236 (writ of certiorari); Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488, 489 (Me.1986) (writ of mandamus); Norton v. Emery, 108 Me. 472, 476 , 81 A. 671 (1911) (writ of prohibition).
Cited 2 timesPublished434 A.2d 509 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1981
See State v. Brown, Me., 410 A.2d 1033, 1036-37 (1980). We find here no obvious error affecting substantial rights. … See State v. Butts, Me., 372 A.2d 1041, 1042 (1977). State v. Brown, 410 A.2d at 1037 . As for the prosecutor’s comment as a whole, there is evidence which supports that characterization of the defendant’s conduct.
Cited 33 timesPublished152 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1956
The defendant by his demurrer admits all facts well pleaded, Brown v. Rhoades, 126 Me. 186, 187 . Pennell v. Cummings, 75 Me. 163 , is a case of indeterminate insanity commitment. … Brown v. Rhoades, 126 Me. 186, 187 . Exceptions sustained. Case remanded.
Cited 25 timesPublished225 A.2d 631 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 1967
In Pillsbury v. … Pillsbury v. Brown, supra. In 1915 the “old county road” was mentioned as a bound commencing at the river *635 in a deed to the predecessors in title of both plaintiffs and defendant.
Cited 8 timesPublishedEric v. Warnquist v. State Tax Assessor
2019 ME 19 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 29, 2019
See BCN Telecom, Inc. v. … The Assessor denied the petition. [¶9] The Warnquists then appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals (the Board). 36 M.R.S. § 151(2)(F)(1) (2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeyes v. Second Baptist Church
99 Me. 308 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 2, 1904
In Doane v. … The court properly ruled that the defendants were not liable for the falling of the board, Jager v.
Cited 2 timesPublished138 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 14, 1942
I think, however, an examination of these cases shows that in only three of them, namely, State v. Brown, 118 Me., 164, 106 A., 429 ; State v. Mulkern, 118 Me., 477, 105 A., 177 , and State v. … O’Donnell, supra, a recent case succeeding the Brown, Mulkern, and Rogers cases, supra.
Cited 29 timesPublished10 A.3d 1159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2011
Irish v. … Arel v.
Cited 10 timesPublished62 Me. 296 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872
In the case of Commonwealth v. … In Barker v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedLovejoy v. Inhabitants of Foxcroft
91 Me. 367 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 1898
Clark v. School District, 3 R. I. 199; Baileyville v. Lowell, 20 Maine, 178; Belfast Bank v. Stockton, 72 Maine, 522; Brown v. Winterport, 79 Maine, 305. … Otis v. Stockton, 76 Maine, 506; Brown v. Winterport, 79 Maine, 305; Hurd v. St. Albans, 81 Maine, 343. Such is also the law in Massachusetts whence we derived our town system. Dickinson v.
Cited 6 timesPublished16 F. Cas. 946 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 18, 1838
Cloutman v. Tunison [Case No. 2,907]; Edwards v. The Susan [Id. 4,299]. … Edwards v. The Susan [supra]; Thompson v. The Philadelphia [Case No. 13,973]; The Happy Return [Id. 13,697]. It is also the settled construction of the statute in Massachusetts district. Holmes v.
Cited 1 timesPublished351 A.2d 125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1976
The commitment order bore the signature of the chairman of the Lubec Board of Selectmen. At that time Lloyd Leighton was a member of such Board of Selectmen. … Leighton was no longer a member of the Board of Selectmen. .
Cited 2 timesPublished580 A.2d 155 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 25, 1990
Dorothy Chasse appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Denis Mazerolle, M.D. entered in Superior Court (Penobscot County, Browne, J.) on Chasse’s claim that she was wrongfully sterilized. … George v. City of Biddeford, 76 Me. 593 (1885); Oliver v. Berry, 53 Me. 206, 207 (1865).
Cited 13 timesPublishedGroton v. Inhabitants of Waldoborough
11 Me. 306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1834
These distinctions are stated by Lord Mansfield in Smith v. Bromley, cited in 2 Douglas, 696, and in Browning v. … Thus in Morgan v.
Cited 2 timesPublished120 Me. 491 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1921
Party of the first part agrees to saw and deliver at mill, to party of the second part, sufficient board sticks to stick all lumber, Party of the first part to saw at his own expense boards for covering in mill, but to leave … Liberty v. Harris, 103 Maine, 191.
Cited 6 timesPublished78 Me. 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1886
Bugbee v. Sargent, 23 Maine, 269; Merrill v. Bickford, 65 Maine, 118; Birdsall v. Hewlett, 1 Paige, Ch. 32; Pom. Eq. § 1246, note 2. … Earl, J., in Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 143 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedCelentano v. Department of Corrections
887 A.2d 512 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 2005
. [¶ 1] The State of Maine Department of Corrections appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Elwin> HO) awarding benefits to Michael Celentano. … We will not overturn a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer “unless it can be said that; the Board lacks a rational basis for its application of law to the facts.” Longtin v.
Cited 2 timesPublished154 Me. 179 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 22, 1958
“The conclusion reached in this Brown case (State v. Brown, 331 Mo. 556, 559 , 56 S. … Griffin v. Boston, 188 Mass. 475 . Brown v. Brown, 208 Mass. 290 . See for a full discussion of all the principles, Com *196 monwealth v. Tucker, 189 Mass. 457 , 479 to 485.” (Emphasis supplied.) Wilson v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLeete & Lemieux, P.A. v. Horowitz
53 A.3d 1106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 2012
Co. v. Me. Employers’ Mut. Ins. … Notwithstanding that confidentiality, any person, including but not limited to members of the Board, Fee Arbitration Commission and Board staff may notify governmental officials of actual or threatened criminal conduct by
Cited 7 timesPublishedInhabitants of Mount Desert v. Inhabitants of Bluehill
118 Me. 293 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 31, 1919
Nevins for board and clothing from October 25, 1917, to Aug. 9,1918 .... $524.00.” … Bangor v. Hampden, 41 Maine, 484; Corinna v. Exeter, 13 Maine, 321.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna