Case law

State v. George

287 Or. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2017

In State v. … Recently, in State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 197 , 390 P3d 992 (2017), the court reaffirmed the automobile exception that it recognized in Brown 30 years earlier and the requirement that it articulated in State v.

State v. Eppers

138 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1931

But we regard it as a question of fact and not of law, to be submitted to the jury. ’ ’ To like effect, see State v. Pomeroy, 30 Or. 16 ( 46 P. 797 ); State v. Minnick, 54 Or. 86 ( 102 P. 605 ); State v. … In addition to the authorities hereinbefore cited, see State v. Hill, 63 Or. 451, 459 ( 128 P. 444 ); State v.

National Labor Relations Board v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 27, 2021

Stoianoff v. … Agents & Brokers v.

State v. Olinger

240 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

However, if Brown’s entry onto that area of the curtilage was not pursuant to defendant’s implied consent, his intrusion was a trespass, and thus a search in violation of Article I, section 9. City of Eugene v. … See Ball v.

State v. Porter

312 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1991

The Oregon Supreme Court, on October 12, 1977, issued its opinion in Hugh Duffy Brown v. Multnomah County District Court, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 [1977]. … For example, Senator Gardner, sponsor of SB 55, stated that the bill was intended to comply with Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

State v. Amsden

86 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1917

But whatever motive may have prompted the amendment, the decisions rendered in the cases of Multnomah County v. Knott, 6 Or. 279, 280 , and Thompson v. … Brown, Attorney General, for the motion. Mr. W. Lair Thompson, contra. In Banc. Mr. Justice Moore delivered the opinion of the court. 2.

State v. Port of Tillamook

62 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1912

Brown v. Sengstacken, 61 Or. 455 ( 122 Pac. 292 ). 2. We will take up the questions referred to in their inverse order. … Lane County v. Neilon, 44 Or. 14, 21 ( 74 Pac. 212 ). Presumptions of this character are made a part of the substantive law of this State by statutory enactment. In State ex inf. Brown v.

The Ancaios

170 F. 106 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 5, 1909

A letter of date March 28, 1907, written by James & Alexander Brown, of Newcastle, N. S. … A statement of account was had between him and James & Alexander Brown, of Newcastle, N. S.

State v. Lyons

324 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1996

Brown, 297 Or at 438-39 ; State v. Johanesen, 319 Or 128 , *282 136, 873 P2d 1065 (1994). … Axell, 235 Cal App 3d 836, 1 Cal Rptr 2d 411 (1991), rev den (1992); State v. Brown, 470 NW2d 30 (Iowa 1991); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va 78, 393 SE2d 609 , cert den 498 US 908 (1990); Caldwell v.

McCarthy v. Kiernan

118 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1926

Plaintiff in that year also constructed 620 feet of board walk on floats, at an estimated cost of $1,200. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Ross

199 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2005

Defendant argues that the testimony of the two witnesses constituted scientific evidence and, therefore, under the Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … See State v.

State v. Bennett

301 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1986

This case is a textbook application of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution as interpreted in State v. Brown, supra. … As to the state constitution, State v. Brown would uphold the search as constitutionally valid because a magistrate could have authorized the search of the entire vehicle and its contents. United States v.

Graef v. Bowles

119 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1926

Brown said to me that I would have .' … It is likewise a principle set forth in Portland v.

State v. Branch

243 Or. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2011

Defendant argued to the court that the state had failed to satisfy the factors delineated in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … v.

National Labor Relations Board v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 9, 2020

Gun Rights Comm. v. Reno, 98 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th Cir. 1996); cf. Stoianoff v. … See id.; see also Okpalobi v..

Browning v. Sacrison

267 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1974

Francis Marion Browning is the same person as Franklin M. Browning. . . Robert Stanley Browning is the same person as Robert Stanley Sacrison. … Bean et al v. First Nat’l. Bank et al, 217 Or 340 , 341 P2d 512 (1959); Williamson v. Denison and Groves, 185 Or 249 , 202 P2d 477 (1947); Stein v. U. S. National Bank, 165 Or 518 , 108 P2d 1016 (1941); Stevens v.

State v. Garcia

272 Or. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 2015

Myrick (A158004) Gines, Dennis L. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A156957) Lopez-Daniel, Olegario v. Premo (A152909) State v. Al-Khafagi, Jabbar Sachet (A155956/57) State v. … Employment Department et al (A158374) Dillard, Carvel Gordon v. Brown (A156060), rev den, 358 Or 248 Gramajo, Eber v. Nooth (A153417), rev den, 358 Or 69 Hamilton, Albert L. v.

Jodoin v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., Inc.

125 Or. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1928

BROWN, J. Does the Employers ’ Liability Act apply to this case? This is the first question to be determined. … He thus described the trucks used by the company, one of which he, with his partner, was pulling across the dock when he was injured: “Well, they are a truck about half a foot high when one of these boards is laid on top

Miller v. Arenz

103 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1920

Arenz, was secretary of the corporation; that Theodore Arenz was authorized by a resolution of the board of directors to do everything pertaining to the general business of the corporation, and that he did it; that on July … Affirmed, Harris, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Kenworthy v. Slooman

62 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1912

Evid. 343, 353; 25 Cyc. 1624, 1625; Bounds v. Little, 75 Tex. 316, 321 ( 12 S. W. 1109 ) ; Wiseman v. N. P. R. R. Co., 20 Or. 425 ( 26 Pac. 272 : 23 Am. St. Rep. 135 ) ; Harmon v. … L., Fowle v. House, 30 Or. 305 ( 47 Pac. 787 ), and State v. Richardson, 48 Or. 309, 314 ( 85 Pac. 225 : 8 L. R. A. [N.