Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.17s

  • Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    341 A.2d 312 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1975

    Jarrott v. Scrivener, supra at 832. … Quick v. District of Columbia Department of Motor Vehicles, D.C.App., 331 A.2d 319, 322 (1975) ; Dietrich v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    417 F.2d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1969

    NLRB v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 309 U.S. 206, 226 , 60 S.Ct. 493, 503 , 84 L.Ed. 704 (1940). … We * * * [found] their use unobjectionable and within the competence of the Board.” United Steelworkers of America v. NLRB, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 263, 393 F.2d 661 , 664 (1968).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hills v. Mason

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025

    See Brown v. Jewell, 134 F. Supp. 3d 170, 176 (D.D.C. 2015) (Courts “have an independent obligation to determine whether subject- matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party.”) … Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 972–74 (6th Cir. 1997) (due process challenge to VA procedures); Weaver v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Insurance Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    360 F.2d 823 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1966

    See General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200, 206 , 56 S.Ct. 185 , SO L.Ed. 154 (1935). . National Labor Relations Board v. American Nat. Ins. … Wkrs., etc. v. N.L.R.B., 120 U.S. App.D.C. 45, 343 F.2d 327 (1965). In City of Chicago v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee v. National Labor Relations Board

    603 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1978

    An agency in its deliberations is under an obligation to follow, distinguish, or overrule its own precedent, Brown v. … Webb, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 233 at 242 , 580 F.2d 496 at 505, n. 25 (1978); NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968); see also Brown v. NLRB, supra; NLRB v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Matter of Alexander

    496 A.2d 244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1985

    As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stated in Schilling v. … Brown and based thereon affixed the signature of Brown and Respondent. 9 . The Committee relied upon the broad sense of the term "administration of justice” as found in D.C.App.R. XI, Section 2. 10 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. United States

    871 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2005

    See Yoon v. United States, 594 A.2d 1056, 1066 (D.C.1991); Stein v. United States, 532 A.2d 641, 643-44 (D.C.1987) (citing Mitchell v. … See Kuhn v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 342 v. National Labor Relations Board

    598 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1979

    The dissent would accept the interpretation offered by counsel for the Board on appeal, and enforce the order as interpreted. This solution is said to derive from J. I. Case Co. v. … While we express no opinion on the appropriate unit on the facts of this case (an issue which “involves questions of fact and policy reserved for the Board,” Lewis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ernest S. Jenkyns v. Board of Education of District of Columbia

    294 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1961

    He sued to set aside the Board’s order. The District Court granted summary judgment for the Board, and this appeal followed. It is not shown that any procedural requirements were violated. … Silver v. McCamey, 1955, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 318 , 221 F.2d 873 . It follows that the order of the District Court must be Affirmed,

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marijuna Policy Project v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    191 F. Supp. 2d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2002

    However, the Board refused to release the election results, fearing that to do so would violate the Barr Amendment. In Turner v. … The Board may also keep a measure off the ballot if it would be patently unconstitutional if enacted. See Comm. for Voluntary Prayer v. Wimberly, 704 A.2d 1199 (D.C.1997).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Sullivan

    773 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1991

    Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N. Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 473 , 109 S.Ct. 3028, 3031 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989). Defendants later conceded this point. Transcript of July 12, 1991 Hearing at 39. … The Court cited Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603, 605-06 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 683, 684-85 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), in support of that statement.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • S & F Market Street Healthcare LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    570 F.3d 354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2009

    v. … Mail Contractors of Am. v. NLRB, 514 F.3d 27, 31 (D.C. Cir. 2008). In this case we conclude the Board erred in applying the exception in NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation v. Renegotiation Board

    515 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1975

    515 F.2d 1017 169 U.S.App.D.C. 300 Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation v. Renegotiation Board 71-1730 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 6/12/75 1 D.C.D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

    314 F. Supp. 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1969

    See also Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Johnston, 295 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1961); American Air Export & Import Co. v. O’Neill, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 221 F.2d 829 (1954); Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. … Reynolds v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Licari

    434 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 1977

    Brown, apparently all work in an office building located at 613 G Street, N.W. 1 and apparently have during the course of their employments occasionally shared an elevator in that building. … On April 2, 1976, plaintiff alleges, he boarded this elevator together with several other passengers, including both defendants.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    424 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1970

    B. v. … Stevens remedy,” which would require the publication of the Board’s mandates through oral explanation of the Board’s ruling on this case to assembled employees on Company time. J. P. Stevens (I) v. N. L. R.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • American Federation of Government Employees, Local 812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    711 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 18, 2010

    Goland v. … See Steinberg v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    475 F.2d 1316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 1973

    In NLRB v. … This interpretation of section 10 (k) by the Board is entitled to great weight. United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    766 A.2d 59 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2001

    In Washington Press Club v. … See Morrison v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 422 A.2d 347, 349-50 (D.C.1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Local 808, Building Maintenance, Service & Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board

    727 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1989

    V This Court does not enter this injunction lightly. … National Mediation Board, 425 F.2d 527, 542 (D.C.Cir. 1970); Seaboard World Airways v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.