Case law

State v. Leland

190 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1951

State v. … Lemon v.

Theis v. Intermountain Education Service District Board of Directors

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 20, 2025

IMESD has a Board of Directors (“the Board”) that establishes “policies for IMESD consistent with the requirements of law and the statewide goals and standards established by the State Board of Education.” … United States v. Brown, 720 F. Supp. 3d 1020, 1026 (D.

State v. Bowman

373 Or. 213 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2025

Id. at 594 (quoting State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 409, 687 P2d 751 (1984)). 224 State v. … State v. Jesse, 360 Or 584, 596, 385 P3d 1063 (2016) (citing State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 409, 687 P2d 751 (1984)).

State v. Lawson

127 Or. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

In State v. … See State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 407 . Therefore, for the evidence to be admissible, defendant must demonstrate the evidence’s probative value under the test announced in Brown. State v.

State v. Murphy

253 Or. 444 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1969

In State v. … State v. Cameron, supra; Crowell v. State, 195 Miss 427, 15 S2d 508, 509 (1943). •:'Thé judgment is affirmed.

State v. Dormitzer

123 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1927

As to the sufficiency of such an indictment, see State v. Sweet, 2 Or. 127 ; State v. Reinhart, 26 Or. 466 ( 38 Pac. 822 ); State v. Stearns, 28 Or. 262 ( 42 Pac. 615 ); State v. … Browning, 47 Or. 470 ( 82 Pac. 955 ); State v. Chapin, 74 Or. 346 ( 144 Pac. 1187 ).

State v. Carrol

54 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1981

Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem. … NOTES [1] Though this presentence procedure did not comply with the statutory requirements of ORS 171.735, see State v. Dodson, 25 Or.

State v. Owens

207 Or. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 19, 2006

See State v. Owens, 187 Or App 719 , 69 P3d 763 (2003) (Owens I). … In State v.

State v. Amsden

86 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1917

But whatever motive may have prompted the amendment, the decisions rendered in the cases of Multnomah County v. Knott, 6 Or. 279, 280 , and Thompson v. … Brown, Attorney General, for the motion. Mr. W. Lair Thompson, contra. In Banc. Mr. Justice Moore delivered the opinion of the court. 2.

Pinnell v. Belleque

638 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 26, 2009

The State relies on Brown v. Zenon, 133 Or.App. 291 , 891 P.2d 666 (1995), a post-Palmer case, to support its argument. … Cornell’s Statements to the Oregon Board of Parole and PosP-Prison Supervision Petitioner asserts Cornell’s statements to the Oregon Parole Board in 2002, 2004, and 2006 in which he confessed that he was responsible for Ruffner

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Moore

299 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1985

Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found that the transaction was a loan. … In re Brown, 298 Or 285, 291 , 692 P2d 107 (1984).

Kidder v. Nekoma Lumber Co.

196 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1952

Phillips v. Graves, 139 Or 336, 349 , 9 P2d 490 , 83 ALR 1 ; McKinley et al. v. Tice et al., 129 Or 190, 196 , 276 P 1110 ; Spratt v. Brown-Petzel Lumber Co., 105 Or 672, 680 , 210 P 700 . … Hospes v. Lumberman’s Board of Exchange, 33 Minn 471, 23 NW 838 . Common knowledge, as well as the foregoing definition, teaches that scaling does not comprehend assistance “in obtaining or securing sawlogs”.

Hall v. Boyles

85 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 1987

Dry Canyon Farms v. U.S. National Bank of Oregon, 84 Or App 686 , 735 P2d 620 (1987); see also Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438 , 722 P2d 739 (1986). In Brown v. … Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., supra. Reversed and remanded. E. R. Boyles is also known as Richard E. Boyles and as Elva Richard Boyles. We shall refer to him as “husband.”

State v. Rector

82 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1986

See, e.g., State v. Classen, supra; State v. Bush, 29 Or App 315 , 563 P2d 747 (1977); State v. McBain, 24 Or App 737 , 547 P2d 188 , rev den (1976). … on State v.

State v. Eppers

138 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1931

But we regard it as a question of fact and not of law, to be submitted to the jury. ’ ’ To like effect, see State v. Pomeroy, 30 Or. 16 ( 46 P. 797 ); State v. Minnick, 54 Or. 86 ( 102 P. 605 ); State v. … In addition to the authorities hereinbefore cited, see State v. Hill, 63 Or. 451, 459 ( 128 P. 444 ); State v.

Whitney v. Canadian Bank of Commerce

239 Or. 472 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1965

The State Land Board appeals from an order denying its motion requesting distribution of funds claimed by way of an escheat. This is the second time the case has been before us on appeal. In Whitney v. … It is patent that the donor would not have intended to confer a benefit on the State Land Board at the expense of a friend whom he expressly designated as the object of his bounty.

National Labor Relations Board v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 27, 2021

Stoianoff v. … Agents & Brokers v.

State v. Porter

312 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1991

The Oregon Supreme Court, on October 12, 1977, issued its opinion in Hugh Duffy Brown v. Multnomah County District Court, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 [1977]. … For example, Senator Gardner, sponsor of SB 55, stated that the bill was intended to comply with Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.

226 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1961

Tolman, 12 Or. 289 , 7 Pac. 103 ; Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or 96 , 25 Pac. 362 , 11 L.R.A. 155 , 23 Am St. Rep. 95; Belle v. *150 Brown, 37 Or. 588 , 61 Pac. 1024 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 , 68 Pac. 739 , 93 Am. St. … A meeting of the Board of Directors of Pacific was held on October 30,1948.

Carpet Mill & Lighthouse v. Employment Division

56 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

See Kirkpatrick v. Peet, supra; Sharp v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 733 , 615 P2d 374 , rev den 290 Or 211 (1980). … There was evidence on each of those factors. (4) Dave Brown had two or more effective contracts or held himself out as a contractor.