Case law

Lucas v. Board of Commissioners of Montclair

128 N.J.L. 149 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1942

In any such situation, the rule in Aldridge v. Essex Road Board, 51 N. J. L. 166, applies. … This brings the present case squarely within the ruling in Righter v. Newark, 45 N. J. L. 104, 109. Another answer is that municipal property is not assessable. Green v. Hotaling, 44 N. J.

Estate of Boyle v. Board of Trustees

234 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1989

State v. Butler, 89 N.J. 220, 226 (1982). … Cwiklinski v. Burton, 217 N.J.Super. 506, 509 (App.Div.1987). This presumption implies receipt of an intrastate mailing within 15 days after its posting. See Waite v.

Carine v. CLIFFSIDE PARK BOARD OF EDUCATION

161 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1978

Super. 137 (1978) 390 A.2d 1228 ARTHUR CARINE, ANNE MARIE CARINE, JOSEPH TRAMUTOLA, ROBERT MASSA, THEODORE SCHMIDT, MARY LICATA, JOSEPH LICATA, ROSALYN LOBEL, ANITA HIRSH AND LEO KAZAZIAN, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Plaintiffs contend that according to Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus, 42 N.J. 556 (1964), public schools are subject to local zoning.

Township of Winslow v. Board of Education

108 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1970

The board appeals. The core holding of the trial court was that the board had acquired the land “for school purposes,” contrary to N. J. S. … The township points out- that the board’s brief does not expressly attack the trial court’s finding that the acquisition by the board of this land was for school purposes.

Dilts v. Franklin Township Planning Board

272 N.J. Super. 234 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1994

Appellate review of a municipal planning board’s decision is limited to whether the action of the board was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or ultra vires. Burbridge v. … A planning board’s decision on questions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. Mayflower Sec. v. Bureau of Sec., 64 N.J. 85, 93 , 312 A.2d 497 (1973); Grancagnola v.

Board of Education v. Boards of Education

145 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 1975

The Board of Education of the Township of Little Egg Harbor appeals from a final decision of the State Board of Education which affirmed a decision of the Commissioner of Education. … . * *■ * [Thomas v. Morris Tp. Bd. of Ed., 89 N. J. Super. 327, 332 (App. Div. 1965), aff’d 46 N. J. 581 (1966)] See also, Quinlan v. North Bergen Tp. Bd. of Ed., 73 N. J. Super. 40, 46-47 (App. Div. 1962).

Sigretto v. Board of Adjustment of Rutherford

134 N.J.L. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1946

Jersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of Jersey City, 127 N. J. L. 194. The limitation upon the use of prosecutor’s land is not within the statute R. S. 40:55-52. Eastern Boulevard Cory. v. Willaredi, 125 N. J. … Brown v. Terhune, 125 Id. 618. The action complained of will be set aside, with costs, and a suitable writ may issue, if necessary, to effectuate this determination.

Sullivan v. Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders

179 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1981

Their contention as set forth in Sullivan’s brief on this appeal is that “a collective negotiation agreement under the Employer-Employee Relations Act is a legal obligation which cannot be altered by action of the county board … Freeholder Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 411 (App.Div.1980); In re Bergen Cty. Freeholder Bd. v. Bergen Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.1980).

Town of Montclair v. State Board of Equalization

88 N.J.L. 374 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1915

of equalization of taxes of Niew Jersey, which sustained the action of the county board. … The case is similar to, although not identical with, New York Bay Railroad Co. v. Newark, 82 N. J. L. 591, 595.

Borough of Oakland v. Board of Conservation & Development

98 N.J.L. 806 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 21, 1923

Herbert v. Atlantic City, 87 N. J. L. 98, 102; Apple v. Atlantic City, 104 Atl. Rep. 89 ; Brennan v. Jersey City, 104 Id. 90 ; Crane v. Jersey City, 90 N. J. … L. 109; affirmed on opinion by this court, 92 Id. 248; Foley v. Orange, 91 Id. 554; Hewson v.

Urso & Brown, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation

19 N.J. Tax 246 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 4, 2001

Plaintiff, Urso & Brown, Inc., predecessor to Al Gar/The Display Connection, Inc., sells custom-designed point-of-sale merchandise displays to retailers. … See also In re Modem Refractories Service Corp. v.

Hedgepeth v. Board of Education of Trenton

131 N.J.L. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1944

It is unlawful for Boards of Education to exclude children from any public school on the ground that they are of the negro race. R. S. 18:14-2; Pierce v. Union District School Trustees, 46 N. J. … L. 76; affirmed, 47 Id. 348; Raison v. Board of Education of Berkeley, 103 Id. 547; Patterson v. Board of Education of Trenton, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 179; affirmed, 112 N. J. L. 99. The writ will be allowed.

McVoy v. Board of Adjustment of Montclair Tp.

213 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1986

The same prohibition applies to members of a planning board. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-23b. We held in Zell v. Borough of Roseland, 42 N.J. … See Sokolinski v. Woodbridge Tp. Municipal Council, 192 N.J.

Van Schaick v. Board of Riparian Commissioners

82 N.J.L. 219 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 18, 1911

In Attorney-General v. Morris & Cummings Dredging Co., 19 Dick. Ch. … In Attorney-General v. Central Railroad Co., 2 Robb. 198, this same jurisdiction was entertained (Vice-Chancellor Emery). In Attorney-General v.

Naughton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

246 N.J. Super. 649 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1991

P.G. v. Brick Township Board of Education

124 F. Supp. 2d 251 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 11, 2000

of Education (“Board”). … E.M. v. Millville Bd. of Educ., 849 F.Supp. 312, 316 (D.N.J.1994); cf. Hensley v.

Mayor of Newark v. State Board of Taxation

66 N.J.L. 466 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

Pipe Line v. Berry, 24 Vroom 212 . The assessment of the Kewark board was imposed under the act of April 11th, 1866. Gen. Stat., p. 3292. … King v. Bath, 14 East 609; King v. Rochdale Water Works, 1 Man. & Sel. 634; Rex v. Birmingham Co., 1 Barn. & C. 506; King v. Brighton Gas Co., 5 Id. 466; Electric Tel. Co. v. Overseer, 11 Hurlst. & G. 181; Cory v.

Mausoleum Builders v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments

90 N.J.L. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

Morgan v. Louisiana, 93 U. S. 217 ; Wilson v. Gaines, 103 Id. 417; Memphis, &c., R. R. Co. v. Commissioners, 112 Id. 609; Mercantile Bank v. Tennessee, 161 Id. 161; State Board of Assessors v. … See, also, Picard v. East Tennessee, &c., Railroad Co., 130 U. S. 637 .

Greene v. Hudson County Board of Health

19 N.J. Super. 453 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1952

Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, 129 N.J.L. 349 ( Sup. Ct. 1943). … Grosso v. Erdman, 128 N.J.L. 223 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); Kessler v. Minard, 134 N.J.L. 583 ( Sup. Ct. 1946); Gallena v. Scott, 4 N.J. Super. 86 ( App. Div. 1949); Fox v. Board of Education of Newark, supra .

Ferraro v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

114 N.J. 518 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1989