Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,304 results
1.09s
186 W. Va. 394 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991
The issue presented on appeal is whether an occupant qualifies under Kentucky law as having a possessory interest in the occupied property. In Carter v. Louisville & N. Ry. … Clearly, if either Mr. Jackson or Ms. Hunt was cognizant of the fact that he had previously represented her, he or she had an obligation to reveal such professional relationship.
Cited 19 timesPublishedState of West Virginia v. Mitchell Coles
234 W. Va. 132 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014
One exception to this rule permits a defendant to show that the face of the record in the case establishes that a court lacked power to convict or sentence the defendant. 3. … Amendment.20 In Syllabus point 1 of Conner, we summarized our double jeopardy principles: The Double Jeopardy Clause in Article III, Section 5 of the West Virginia Constitution, provides immunity
Cited 14 timesPublishedIntermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · Sep 10, 2025
complaint adequately pleads claims for defamation, invasion of privacy, and whistle-blower retaliation.4 4 The parties have also briefed the issue of whether the respondents were entitled to statutory immunity … “The ‘public figure’ doctrine in privacy law operates in the same manner as qualified privileges operate in defamation law.
Cited 0 timesPublished199 W. Va. 119 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1996
Based upon our review, we do not believe that the jury was completely, clearly and correctly instructed on the law applicable to the facts. … Cordial was entitled to an instruction, tailored to this case, clearly advising the jury of the principles of Horton and clearly not limiting the jury to the consideration of representations E & Y knew to be false when made
Cited 33 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · Jan 18, 2018
The sanction is that such prisoners lose the right to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs, and that three of plaintiff’s prior civil cases qualify as strikes under this provision. … As the magistrate judge posited, a clearly conclusory allegation does not suffice.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWest Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2018
[T]imber values ‘per s[e]’ are out of the appraiser’s realm of expertise and the appraisers recommend that the property be cruised by a qualified professional.” … Husband’s arguments in support of his position that Wife’s jewelry is marital property are not clearly articulated.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 10, 2026
The entire action, meaning all claims, must be dismissed for one of the specified grounds in order to qualify as a “strike.” Tolbert v. Stevenson, 635 F.3d 646, 651 (4th Cir. 2011). … A routine dismissal based on a prisoner’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies does not qualify as a strike. Green v. Young, 454 F.3d 405, 410 (4th Cir. 2006).
Cited 0 timesUnknownErie Insurance Property & Casualty Co. v. Johnson
272 F.R.D. 177 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Dec 21, 2010
argue that “[wjhether or not Erie provided the contracting agent, Regina Morris, with the manual that explains among other things how the insurance application is to be completed and how the policy is intended to operate is clearly … A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest
Cited 9 timesPublished135 W. Va. 488 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1951
Rollins, one of the executors named therein, qualified as the sole executor of said will. In looking over the papers of H. B. Hauer, he found a copy of a letter, dated November 8, 1946, addressed to T. K. … We think it clearly shown by exhibits filed in the case by T. K. Hauer, that, during the period from 1912 to 1942, he contributed in a substantial way to the support of his mother.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMorgantown Mall Associates v. City of Westover
West Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 1, 2017
circuit court concerning a new trial and its conclusion as to the existence of reversible error under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court’s underlying factual findings under a clearly … Lastly, the record on appeal supports the circuit court’s finding that Westover established the seven requirements of West Virginia Code § 8-6-5.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDaniels v. City of South Charleston
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 16, 2021
Va. 1995) (“[IIED] liability clearly does not extend to mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities.” … See Graham, 490 U.S. at 394-96 (requiring use of unreasonable force to establish a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim).
Cited 0 timesUnknownState of West Virginia v. Paul H.
West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2017
At trial, the State established that petitioner began sexually assaulting K.H. between 2008 to 2010 when K.H. was ten or eleven years old and petitioner was twenty or twenty-one years old. … Therefore, the evidence clearly supports a finding that Ms. Walls’ evaluation was for diagnostic and treatment purposes.
Cited 0 timesPublished818 S.E.2d 852 · West Virginia Supreme Court · May 11, 2018
This Court clearly enunciated its strong public policy regarding the safety of prescription drugs in State ex rel. Johnson & Johnson v. … The Alabama Supreme Court addressed the question now before this Court and ruled for the injured party, very clearly articulating its reasoning. Wyeth v. Weeks , 159 So.3d 649 (Ala. 2014).
Cited 8 timesPublished495 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Apr 6, 2007
Beckson chooses at trial to exercise his Fifth Amendment privilege, the court will expect the defendant to have waiting in the wings a qualified expert acceptable to the defendant to stand in Dr. … The defendant has [also] already established a relationship with the psychiatrist. (Trans, at 16-17).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmiley v. Citizens F. M. & L. Ins.
14 W. Va. 33 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1878
J think the proper construction clearly implies the disjunctive.after the comma. … ‘Any explosion whatever’ is the phrase used in the condition to the policy; and it is qualified by the context only to the extent, that it must be an ‘explosion’ of some ‘explosive substances,’ and of sufficient force to
Cited 11 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2022
She admitted she was not a licensed psychologist, and she testified as a lay witness because she did not qualify as an expert witness. Ms. … These findings shall not be set aside by a reviewing court unless clearly erroneous.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Chafin v. Halbritter
191 W. Va. 741 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1994
In determining whether the subject marital homes constituted marital property, these decisions necessarily assume the existence of situations in which a marital home may not qualify as marital property. … These goals are clearly not realized through the temporary order entered below. The location and demands of Petitioner’s employment require her to reside in or near Charleston.
Cited 6 timesPublished35 W. Va. 554 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1891
(1) Au adversary possession must be actual, as contrasted with constructive, possession ; that is, such as is the incident of the true legal title when there is nothing to qualify or break its force-. … In conclusion, we think it has been clearly shown on the part of the town of Philippi (1) that AYilliam P.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2025
A circuit court’s ruling on involuntarily administering medication to a defendant for competency restoration purposes must follow the four-part test established in Sell v. … 13 When analyzing the first factor of the Sell test, the circuit court found, and we agree, that the State’s interest in restoring the petitioner’s competency “qualifie
Cited 0 timesPublished212 W. Va. 189 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2002
no other adequate means, such as direct appeal, to obtain the desired relief; (2) whether the petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in a way that is not correctable on appeal; (3) whether the lower tribunal’s order is clearly … Code 35-1-5 establishes the procedure whereby church trustees are appointed and removed. Another Code section, W.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna