Case law

Resnick v. East Brunswick Township Board of Education

144 N.J. Super. 474 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1976

Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders

94 N.J. 422 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 1983

Compare id. with Cullum v. Board of Educ. of N. Bergen Tp., 15 N.J. 285 (1954), and Grogan v. DeSapio, 11 N.J. 308 (1953) (overturning municipal action where there was detailed proof of the abuse of discretion). … Ringwood Solid Waste Management Auth. v.

Knickerbocker Importation Co. v. State Board of Assessors

73 N.J.L. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1905

Because of an erroneous report made by the company to the state board of assessors a tax of $500 was levied for January 1st, 1904, and the company now seeks to have it reduced to $154, on the ground that the stock so held

Van Riper v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

137 N.J.L. 714 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

If that was so an inquiry into the acts of the board itself could be effectively prevented. … In Hudson County v.

Stockton v. Board of Education of Trenton

210 N.J. Super. 150 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 1986

Ass’n v. Bd. of Educ., supra. … In its brief, the Board erroneously states that the Supreme Court in Williams v.

Board of Education v. Buena Regional Education Ass'n

300 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1997

Although the Commissioner and State Board of Education have primary responsibility for the interpretation and administration of the State’s education laws, see Abbott v. … In Accardi v. Pennsylvania R.R.

Central Hills Associates v. Planning Board

111 N.J. 615 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1988

Petition for certification granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Planning Board of the Borough of Hillsborough for reconsideration in light of Kaufmann v. … Planning Board for the Township of Warren, 110 N.J. 551 (1988). Jurisdiction is not retained.

Michelotti Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

191 N.J. Super. 568 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 1983

As was noted in Amato v. … Kessler v. Bowker, 174 N.J.Super. 478, 485 (App.Div.1979). See, also, Yahnel v. Jamesburg Bd. of Adj., 79 N.J.Super. 509, 517 (App.Div.1963), certif. den. 41 N.J. 116 (1963); Bern v.

Estate of Boyle v. Board of Trustees

234 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 1989

State v. Butler, 89 N.J. 220, 226 (1982). … Cwiklinski v. Burton, 217 N.J.Super. 506, 509 (App.Div.1987). This presumption implies receipt of an intrastate mailing within 15 days after its posting. See Waite v.

Williams v. Board of Education of Trenton

124 N.J.L. 380 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1940

process * * * had ever been issued and served upon” the said board. … Dock v. The Elizabethtown Steam Manufacturing Co., 34 N. J. L. 312. The cases relied upon by the respondent here, principally equity cases, have no applicability. For example, in Pierce v.

Harrison Associates v. Rent Leveling Board

107 N.J. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 24, 1987

Weymouth Township Board of Education v. Wolf

178 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1981

Plaintiff alleges that it was defamed by reason of certain remarks published by defendants, the substance of which indicates that the board misused, lost or possibly embezzled substantial school board funds. … State v. Time, Inc., supra; Reilly v. Curtiss, 83 N.J.L. 77 (Sup.Ct.1912). It is the conclusion of the court, therefore, that the principles outlined in Chicago v.

Perrella v. Board of Education of Jersey City

51 N.J. 323 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1968

Koribanics v. Board of Education of City of Clifton, 48 N. J. 1, 5 (1966); Brennan v. Byrne, 31 N. J. 333, 337 (1960); Barringer v. Miele, 6 N. J. 139 (1951); Ackley v. Norcross, 122 N. J. L. 569, 572 (Sup. … Rowe v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, 61 N. J. L. 130 (Sup. Ct. 1891).

Township of Winslow v. Board of Education

108 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1970

The board appeals. The core holding of the trial court was that the board had acquired the land “for school purposes,” contrary to N. J. S. … The township points out- that the board’s brief does not expressly attack the trial court’s finding that the acquisition by the board of this land was for school purposes.

Northvale Board of Education v. Northvale Education Ass'n

192 N.J. 501 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 2007

Kurtz v. Burlington County Board of Taxation

4 N.J. Tax 343 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 5, 1982

The memorandum of judgment issued by the county board and forwarded to plaintiffs’ attorney (a copy of which is attached to the complaint), is entitled “Joan Kurtz, Petitioner v. Mansfield Township, Respondent.” … N.J.S.A. 54:3-26; 3 Danis v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 113 N.J.Super. 6, 9 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div.1971).

Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

192 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2007

R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 25 , 527 A.2d 843 (1987)). … In 1988, we applied the Kane standard in the companion cases of Maynard, v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A.2d 1213 (1988), and Ciecwisz v.

Clark Thread Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

54 N.J.L. 265 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1892

In Eliot v. Blake, 1 T. … In Spieres v. Parker, 1 T. R. 141, Mr.

Crescent Bottling Works v. Board of Pharmacy

121 N.J. Eq. 237 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1937

Stat. pp. 3943, 3946) and so not within the prohibitory language of section 3 of that act; and prayed that the board of pharmacy, its agents, etc., be restrained “from interfering with the business of complainant in the sale

Board of Health v. North American Home

77 N.J. Eq. 464 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 7, 1910

Leaming, V. C. Two bills have been filed, in each of which the object sought is to prevent defendant from conducting in Yentnor City a sanatorium for the treatment of tuberculosis. … One bill was filed by the board of health of that city and the other by individual residents and property holders. A preliminary hearing has been had to determine whether an injunction pendente lite should be issued.