Case law

Project, Inc. v. Productive Living Board for St. Louis County Citizens With Developmental Disabilities

234 S.W.3d 597 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2007

PLB is a not-for-profit corporation with a board of directors appointed by the County Executive pursuant to Section 205.968.1. Similarly, the City of St. Louis (hereinafter, “the City”) established an SB^IO board, St. … Initially, we recognize the Court of Appeals has engaged in judicial review of an SB-40 board’s decision on funding in Vocational Services Inc. v.

Jim Marcantonio v. The Board of Curators of Lincoln University A/K/A Lincoln University

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 2024

Jim Marcantonio sued his former employer, The Board of Curators of Lincoln University, in the Circuit Court of Cole County. … In Daugherty v.

Flaherty v. St. Louis Transit Co.

207 Mo. 318 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 27, 1907

[Browning v. Railroad, infra.] … [Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. l. c. 71, et seq.] The instruction questioned follows an approved precedent. [Mirrielees v. Railroad, 163 Mo. l. c. 483.] There being no reversible error, the judgment must be affirmed.

State ex rel. Walker v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

926 S.W.2d 148 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 1996

At the hearing, members of the Board would “ask Dr. … This procedure was recently outlined by the Missouri Supreme Court in Artman v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 918 S.W.2d 247 (Mo.banc 1996). Section 334.100.2 governs physician discipline.

Bishop's Residence Co. v. Hudson

91 Mo. 671 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1887

It is then averred that by reason of said facts, said property is exempt from taxation, but that, notwithstanding, the board of assessors of the city of St. … Bishop of Chester, 1 Brown, 444; Trustees of Cory Universalist Society v. Beatty, 28 N. J. Eq. 570; Price v. Maxwell, 28 Pa. St. 23. In the case of Schmidt v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1992

If any school district has money in the teachers', incidental, building, or debt service fund not needed within a reasonable period of time for the purpose for which the money was received, the school board in the district … Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D.M. v.

Squaw Creek Drainage District v. Turney

235 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1911

In Morrison v. … [Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 ; Copeland v. St. Joseph, 126 Mo. 417 .]

Ingle v. Case

777 S.W.2d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1989

In Bennett v. … A petition alleging the defendant was negligent and failed to exercise ordinary care in supplying a board for a scaffold that broke is insufficient. Wak-up v. Brown, 637 S.W.2d 335 (Mo.App.1982).

State ex rel. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Southworth

704 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 18, 1986

Boutilier v. … Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874, 881 (Mo. banc 1983).

Pomirko v. Sayad

693 S.W.2d 323 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1985

Defendants are the members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police Department of the City of St. Louis and the Chief of Police. … Brown & Assocs., Inc. v. King, 662 S.W.2d 572, 573 (Mo.App.1983); State ex rel. Sckoenbacher v. Kelly, 408 S.W.2d 383, 388 (Mo.App.1966).

State ex inf. Hadley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

241 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1912

Similar questions were presented in the case of State ex rel. v. Missouri Pac. Ry. … All concur, except Brown, J., who dissents; Kennish, J., not sitting.

State v. Jones

237 Mo. App. 714 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1942

[State v. Ferris, 16 S. W. (2d) 96 ; State v. Stark, 148 S. W. (2d) 82 .] … [State v. Brown, 98 S. W. (2d) 777 , 339 Mo. 1014 .]

Arens v. City of St. Louis

872 S.W.2d 631 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1994

Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 400 [1] (Mo.App.1990). Appellants’ points are as follows: I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN REVERSING THE [BOARD’S] DECISION BASED ON A LACK OF COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. … Taylor v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Blue Springs, 738 S.W.2d 141, 143 (Mo.App.1987).

State ex rel. Columbia School District v. Thorp

411 S.W.2d 851 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1967

Louis Union Trust Co. v. … Louis Union Trust Co. v.

Cassidy v. United States

304 F. Supp. 864 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 17, 1969

Registrants are expressly denied the right of representation by counsel before Selective Service Boards (Selective Service Regulations Section 1624.1). Nickerson v. … In support of this contention, petitioner states that local boards are autonomous, and therefore separate but equal, and therefore unconstitutional (citing Brown v.

Integra Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Integrity Home Care v. Missouri State Board of Mediation

Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2022

) entries specifically related to the Board. … The Davis court followed Hernandez v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 936 S.W.2d 894 (Mo. App.

Magwire v. Tyler

40 Mo. 406 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

S.) 6; Barnard v. Ashley, 18 How. (U. S.) 44; United States v. Hughes, 11 How. (U. S.) 567; Carroll v. Stafford, 3 How. (U. S.) 441; Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Cranch, 191 ; Taylor v. Brown, 5 Cranch, 243 ; Huntsucker v. … S.) 338; Landes v. Perkins, 12 Mo. 255 ; Patterson v. Fagan, 37 Mo. 81 .

Maguire v. St. Louis Transit Co.

103 Mo. App. 459 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1903

In Murray v. … Seawell v. Railway, 119 Mo. 222 ; Brown v. Railroad, 99 Mo. l. c. 319.

State Ex Rel. Sayad v. Zych

642 S.W.2d 907 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1982

Abernathy v. City of St. Louis, 313 S.W.2d 717, 719 (Mo.1958); Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 166 (1956). See Bardgett, J., dissenting, Boone County Court v. State, 631 S.W.2d 321, 327 (Mo. banc 1982). … Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 166 (1956). Although a law conflicting with a constitutional provision is void, Matter of Additional Magistrates for St.

Leamon v. City of Independence

625 S.W.2d 204 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1981

Priest v. Gunn, 326 S.W.2d 314, 328 (Mo. banc 1959). … This court, in Yates v. Durk, 464 S.W.2d 43 (Mo.App.1971), reviewed the law as to recovery of damages in a mandamus action and discussed at length the opinion in Smith v.