Case law

State ex rel. Umatilla County v. Hawks

110 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924

Banfield, 43 Or. 287 ( 72 Pac. 1093 ); Murphy v. Salem, 49 Or. 54 ( 87 Pac. 532 ). … In 1909, the legislative assembly approved an act creating boards in certain counties and ^vesting in such boards the management of the jails and prisons in their respective counties.

Eldred v. Burns

182 Or. 394 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1947

Brown v. Cain , 56 F. Supp. 56 , is cited to the same effect. This case is most interesting. There the temporary Coast Guardsmen were guarding a war time industry at Chester, Pennsylvania. … State v. Rader , 94 Or. 432 , 186 P. 79 ; State v. Doris , 51 Or. 136 , 94 P. 44 , 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) *Page 414 660; State v. Thompson , 49 Or. 46 , 88 P. 583 ; State v. Tarter , supra.

Jussila v. Sause Bros. Ocean Towing Co.

266 Or. 136 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1973

In Barrell v. … See, e.g., Barrell v. Brown, supra. Whatever may be said for the continuing vitality of the Walker doctrine, we find in this case no occasion to apply that rule.

Dept. of Human Services v. T. M. G.

307 Or. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2020

Cite as 307 Or App 117 (2020) 121 DHS similarly advocated for contact between M and her sib- lings, as did the Citizen Review Board. … State v. Clemente-Perez, 357 Or 745, 752, 359 P3d 232 (2015) (citing Peeples v.

State v. Bailey

356 Or. 486 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2014

set out in Brown was not affected by Hudson. … Brown, 422 US at 605.

State v. Lazarides

358 Or. 728 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 2016

Defendant had failed to report as directed by his supervi- sion officer, and, in December 2014, the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) had issued a warrant for his arrest. … State v. Robbins, 345 Or 28, 37-38, 188 P3d 262 (2008).

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd., an Or. Mun. Corp. v. Miller

290 Or. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 2018

See Morgan v. … ZRZ Realty v.

State v. Burns

259 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2013

The legislature also created the State Sentencing Guidelines Board (the board) to serve *413 as the administrative body that would adopt and promulgate the guidelines in the form of administrative rules. Id,.; State v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982); accord Hazell v. Brown, 352 Or 455, 480 , 287 P3d 1079 (2012).

Thompson v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF COLUMBIA

29 Or. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1977

Any implication in the above quoted language in Fisher v. Union County, supra, that the Board is the only proper opposite party was seemingly put to rest in Williams v. Henry, 70 Or 466, 468 , 142 P 337 (1914). … We conclude that Williams v. Henry, N.W. Env. Def Center v. City Council, and Shanks v.

State v. Henley

310 Or. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 2021

On remand, the trial court held a Brown/O’Key hearing. See State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 (1995); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984). … In Marcum v.

Ramstead v. Bridges

175 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1944

Bahr, 161 Or. 79 , 87 P. (2d) 219 ; Fischer v. Peters, 147 Or. 426 , 34 P. (2d) 305 ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 66 Or. 12 , 132 P. 542 . As said in 12 R. C. L. 953, Gifts § 28, and quoted with approval in Bliss v. … In re Brown’s Estate, 165 Or. 575 , 108 P. (2d) 775 ; 24 Am. Jur. 757 ; Note 123 A. L. R. 1505.

In Re Herdman's Estate

167 Or. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1941

Barzee, 96 Or. 357, 371 , 190 P. 141 ; Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 315, 317 , 33 P. 557 . The rule is no different when the trial is before the court without a jury. 64 C. J. Trial 1213, § 1028. … before the death of his wife, but came from Los Angeles to Portland at his request and did all the work of a housekeeper, including labor of a menial character, in a twelve-room house in which another brother lived and paid board

Fleischner v. Florey

111 Or. 35 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1924

Ed. 531 ); United States v. Keehler, 76 U. S. 83 ( 19 L. Ed. 574 ); Cameron v. Hicks, 65 W. Va. 484 ( 64 S. E. 832 , 17 Ann. Cas. 926); Pine Island Board of Ed. v. Jewell, 44 Minn. 427 ( 20 Am. St. Rep. 586 , 46 N. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

State v. Matischeck

20 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

This appeal presents another double jeopardy *334 problem under the holding of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). … In State v.

Bechtold v. Wilson

182 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1947

Brown v. City of Portland, 120 Or. 76 , 249 P. 819 (1926), opinion by Mr. Justice Belt, is a reversion to the doctrine of Garnsey v. County Court, McAnish v. Grant, Farrow v. Nevin, and McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. … S., Certiorari, 332, § 188; Winn v. Freele, 19 Ala. 171 ; Okerlind v. Fyke, 90 Ill. App. 192 ; Jacobs v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal. App. (2d) 359, 75 P. (2d) 96 .

Umpqua Valley Bank v. Wilson

120 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1926

This distinction was pointed out in the recent case of Beall v. Board of Trade, 164 Mo. App. 186 ( 148 S. … Brown, Belt and Rand, JJ., concur.

State v. Meharry

342 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2006

See State v. … See State v. Kosta, 304 Or 549, 555 , 748 P2d 72 (1987) (recognizing that vehicle’s inherent mobility creates exigency); State v. Bennett, 301 Or 299, 301 , 721 P2d 1375 (1986) (same); Brown, 301 Or at 278 (same).

Price v. Taco Bell Corp.

934 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 19, 1996

v. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.

State v. Andersen

269 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 2015

Three months after Brown , the court considered in State v. … The Supreme Court next confronted the reach of the Oregon automobile exception twenty years after Brown and Kock in State v. Meharry, 342 Or 173 , 149 P3d 1155 (2006).

Gulick v. Copeland

186 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1949

Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co., 45 Or. 335 , 77 P. 485 ; Crider v. Turnbow, 162 Or. 622 , 94 P. (2d) 285 . Defendant is seeking equitable relief, and, being in a court of equity, he must do equity. … Brown’s act in giving plaintiffs credit for $300 on the purchase price, plaintiffs quote from Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins.