Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

3.63s

  • Kansas City v. Mastin

    169 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1902

    [Moran v. January, 52 Mo. 523 ; Welsh v. St. Louis, 73 Mo. 73 , and cases cited; Maloney v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 106 ; Bollinger v. Carrier, 79 Mo. 318 ; St. Joseph v. Robison, 125 Mo. 1 .] … Field, 99 Mo. 352 ; Kansas City v. Oil 140 Mo. 458 ; Kansas City v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pomirko v. Sayad

    693 S.W.2d 323 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1985

    Defendants are the members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police Department of the City of St. Louis and the Chief of Police. … Brown & Assocs., Inc. v. King, 662 S.W.2d 572, 573 (Mo.App.1983); State ex rel. Sckoenbacher v. Kelly, 408 S.W.2d 383, 388 (Mo.App.1966).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Board of Education ex rel. Johnson Heat Regulating Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

    166 Mo. App. 410 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1912

    . — We have in this case the same contract and bond which were before us in the case of the Board of Education ex rel. Phillip Carey Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 155 Mo. App. 109 , 134 S. … First, that the question involved in the case is fully considered and determined *419 by this court in Board of Education ex rel. Carey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., supra.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Houck v. Little River Drainage District

    248 Mo. 373 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1913

    [Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; Columbia Bottom Levee Company v. Meier, 39 Mo. 53 ; Mound City Land & Stock Company v. Miller, 170 Mo. 240 ; Squaw Creek Drainage District v. Turney, 235 Mo. 80 ; Morrison v. … PER CURIAM HST BANC. — The foregoing cause coming into Banc from Division One and being reheard there, the opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court, Brown, J., concurring in the result, Bond, J., dissenting

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.

    122 S.W.3d 599 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2003

    See, e.g., State v. … McCain v. Washington, 990 S.W.2d 685, 689 (Mo.App. E.D.1999).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Colliver

    243 S.W.2d 344 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

    Fahrman v. … Lincoln v. Byrd, 295 Mo. 344 , 244 S.W. 938 ; Ex parte Brown, Mo.App., 297 S.W. 445 , 447; Horsefall v. School Dist. of City of Salem, 143 Mo.App. 541, 545 , 128 S.W. 33 ; Ward v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Integra Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Integrity Home Care v. Missouri State Board of Mediation

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2022

    ) entries specifically related to the Board. … The Davis court followed Hernandez v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 936 S.W.2d 894 (Mo. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nicholas v. Evangelical Deaconess Home & Hospital

    281 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1920

    General Hospital, 120 Mass. 432 ; Gable v. Sisters of St. Francis, 227 Pa. 254 ; Jensen v. Maine Eye Ear Inf., 107 Me. 408 ; Downes v. Harper Hospital, 101 Mich. 555 ; Hospital v. Ross, 12 Clark F. 507; Cunningham v. … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Project, Inc. v. Productive Living Board for St. Louis County Citizens With Developmental Disabilities

    234 S.W.3d 597 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2007

    PLB is a not-for-profit corporation with a board of directors appointed by the County Executive pursuant to Section 205.968.1. Similarly, the City of St. Louis (hereinafter, “the City”) established an SB^IO board, St. … Initially, we recognize the Court of Appeals has engaged in judicial review of an SB-40 board’s decision on funding in Vocational Services Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    686 S.W.2d 543 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1985

    Brown v. Wolff, supra; United States v. Scheer, 729 F.2d 164 (2nd Cir.1984); Russell v. State, supra. Cf. United States v. Eaddy, supra. … Commonwealth v. Dickson, 386 Mass. 230 , 434 N.E.2d 1284 (1982); Commonwealth v. Carrillo, supra. Cf. Brown v. Wolff, supra.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Union Cemetery Ass'n v. Kansas City

    252 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1913

    Board of Com’rs, 51 Fed. 585, 592 .] Also, see: Board of Commissioners v. Young, 59 Fed. 96, 1 . c. 109; Charleston v. Baptist Church, 4 Strob. L. (S. C.) 306, 1. c. 310; Commonwealth v. Fahey, 5 Cush. … Church v. New York, 5 Cow. 538 ; Board of Commissioners v. Young, 59 Fed. 96 .] We are, therefore, of the opinion that this contention of plaintiffs is not well taken. III.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Joshua M. Krasovec v. KC Board of Police Comm., Police Retirement System of Kansas City

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2024

    Ass’n v. Mo. State Bd. of Educ., 34 S.W.3d 266, 274 (Mo. App. 2000). … Dickemann v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Steel & Wire Co. v. City of St. Louis

    354 Mo. 692 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 5, 1945

    Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 1178 , l. c. 1182, 171 S. W. 2d 580 .] *700 The question is considered and so ruled in Neil v. Independent Realty Co., 317 Mo. 1235 , 298 S. … W. 363 ; Gifford et al. v. Horton, 103 Pac. 988 ; Rowe v. James, 128 Pac. 539 ; Johnson v. Grenell, 81 N. E. 161 ; Taylor v. Armstrong, 24 Ark. 102 ; Lamprey v. Am. Hoist & Derrick Co., 266 N. W. 434 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. North

    27 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1858

    (Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Whea. 448-9.) … In the case of Brown v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Schierstein v. Schierstein

    68 Mo. App. 205 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1896

    Moore v. Moore, 51 Mo. 118 ; Berlin v. Berlin, 52 Mo. 151 ; Buck v. Ashbrook, 51 Mo. 539 ; Vogel v. Vogel, 13 Mo. App. 588 ; Miller v. Miller, 14 Mo. App. 418 ; Ayers v. Ayers, 28 Mo. App. 97 ; King v. King, 42 Mo. … App. 454 ; Brown v. Brown, 53 Mo. App. 453 . In Moore v. Moore, supra, and Berlin v. Berlin, supra, which were the first cases in which the question was discussed, it was held that under the statute (section 8918, R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Ellisville v. St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners

    877 S.W.2d 620 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1994

    Louis County election board submitted it to the affected voters. … They urge that county laws are analogous to city laws; that Leoffler v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank

    340 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 5, 1937

    Louis v. Abeln, supra.] … Louis v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Merk ex rel. Merk

    281 S.W.2d 607 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1955

    Charles County finding appellant, Jerry Merk, to be a delinquent child and ordering him committed to the State Board of Training Schools. … Browning v. Kelly, 309 Mo. 465 , 274 S.W. 731 . The court’s ruling on the application for parole, made after the entry of judgment, is a collateral matter which cannot affect the validity or correctness of the judgment.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • ACF Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

    320 S.W.2d 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 1959

    Christy v. Petrus, 365 Mo. 1187 , 295 S.W.2d 122, 124 . … Runnels v. Lasswell, Mo.App., 219 S.W. 980 , 981; John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Dawson, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 57, 59 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moore v. McHaney

    191 Mo. App. 686 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1915

    [See Beall v. Board of Trade, 164 Mo. App. 186 , 148 S. W. 396 ; Martin v. Harrington, 147 Mo. App. l. c. 711, 712, 161 S. W. *694 275 , and authorities cited.] … [See Brown v. Brown, 47 Mo. 130 ; Green v. Estes, 82 Mo. 337 ; Hedden v. Schneblin, 126 Mo. App. l. c. 485, 104 S. W. 887 ; Boone County Lumber Co. v. Niedermeyer, 187 Mo. App. 180 , 173 S. W. 57 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.