Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

2.12s

  • Holyoke v. Holyoke

    78 Me. 404 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 14, 1886

    Hill v. Hill, 2 Mass. 150 ; French v. French, 4 Mass. 587 ; Ford v. Ford, 104 Mass. 198 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 97 Mass. 373 ; Lyster v. Lyster, 111 Mass. 327 . … Bailey v. Bailey, 97 Mass. 373; Lyster v. Lyster, 111 Mass. 327 ; W. v. W. 141 Mass. 495 ; Evans v. Evans, 1 Hagg. Con. 35; Kelly v. Kelly, 2 L. R. Prob. & Div. 31; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 73 N. Y. 369 ; Morris v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Concord Union Mut. F. Insurance v. Woodbury

    45 Me. 447 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

    White v. Brown, 2 Cush. 413 ; King v. State M. F. Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 ; Cushing v. Thompson, 34 Maine, 496. … Co. v. Tyler, 16 Wend. 397 ; Carpenter v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., 16 Pet. 495 . This right of the insurers to subrogation, has been questioned in Massachusetts. It was held in King v. State M. F. Ins.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Worcester v. Lord

    56 Me. 265 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

    All our decisions, in any way bearing upon the question here, Avhether as to the nature and essential elements of disseizin or of adverse possession, such as Brown v. Gay, 3 Greenl., 126, Ross v. … The elaborate and ingenious argument of the tenant’s counsel fails to convince us that the reason assigned by the Court for the decision in Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Richard E.

    978 A.2d 217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 2009

    Phillips v. Johnson, 2003 ME 127, ¶24 , 834 A.2d 938, 945 . Otherwise, to accomplish service, a method specified by the rule must be properly utilized. See Adoption of Spado, 2007 ME 6, ¶ 12 , 912 A.2d at 582 ; Brown v. … See R.K. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Dwinel

    44 Me. 255 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

    Dana v. Fielder, 2 Kernan R., 40. The same principle applies in space. … Such was the rule in Gregory v. McDowell, 8 Wend.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Butler v. McClellan

    4 F. Cas. 905 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 27, 1831

    Relf v. The Maria [case No. 11,692]; Thorne v. White [Id. 13,989]; Jarvis v. The Claiborne [Id. 7,225]; Sampson v. Smith, 15 Mass. 365 . … Flogging on board vessels of commerce was abolished by act of September 28, 1S50 ( 9 Stat. 515 ; Kev. St. 4611).]

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Westbrook v. Teamsters Local No. 48

    578 A.2d 716 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 18, 1990

    Board of *718 School Directors, Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 52 v. Tri-Town Teachers Ass’n, MTA-NEA, 412 A.2d 990, 994 (Me.1980). See also Saco Valley Teachers Ass’n v. Board of Directors, Maine School Admin. Dist. … See Caribou Board of Education v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dillingham's Case

    127 Me. 245 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 1928

    Patrick’s Case, 119 Maine, 510; Brown’s Case, 123 Maine, 424. Disease, to be compensable, must be interpreted both as an “injury” and an “accident.” … .) ; Industrial Commission v. Roth, 120 N. E., 172 (Ohio); Iwanicki v. State Industrial Commission, 205 Pac., 990 (Or.) ; Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor, 265 Pac., 739 (Wash.) ; Miller v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Co-operative Ass'n of America

    109 Me. 448 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 9, 1912

    In Brown v. … See also Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk Mills, 209 Mass., 489 ; Doolan v. Pocasset Mfg. Co., 200 *451 Mass., 200; Finnegan v. Winslow Skate Mfg. Co., 189 Mass., 580 ; and Steele v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hatch v. Norris

    36 Me. 419 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

    Goodall v. Wentworth, 20 Maine, 322; Craft v. Mott, 4 Coms. 603. The performance by Crosby of his part of the conditions of the bond cannot relieve him from his obligations as surety for Norris. … Howard v. Brown, 21 Maine, 385; Wallace v. Carlisle, 20 Maine, 374. Defendants defaulted. Shepley, C. J., and Tenney, Rice and Hathaway, J. J., concurred.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Boston & Maine Corp.

    664 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 8, 1987

    Boston & Maine Corp. v. National Mediation Board, No. 86-2902, Mem. Order (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 1987). 6 . … the Board’s Secretary.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Farrington v. Inhabitants of Anson

    77 Me. 405 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1885

    Oldtown v. Falmouth, 40 Maine, 108. … Mitchell v. Rockland, 52 Maine, 118; Brown v. Vinalhaven, 65 Maine, 402. Judgment for the defendants. Peters, C. J., Walton, Libbey, Emery and Poster, JJ., concurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daniel v. Ouellette

    560 A.2d 566 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 6, 1989

    We stated in Binette v. … See Gowell v. Thompson, 341 A.2d 381, 383 (Me.1975). The jury, not the court, determines the degree of credibility to which witnesses are entitled. Avery v. Brown, 288 A.2d 713, 715 (Me.1972).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fine Line, Inc. v. Blake

    677 A.2d 1061 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1996

    He stated that the Board was not able to use the right of way for access because at a planning board meeting Paul Blake threatened to shoot anybody that went across his property. … In Saltonstall v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Sandra Bastille v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

    146 A.3d 1102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 2016

    SANDRA BASTILLE v. … before the 1 Although Bastille filed a motion for reconsideration with the Board, the applicable agency rules do not authorize such a motion, and therefore the January 23, 2014, decision of the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Franklin Bank v. Small

    24 Me. 52 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1844

    The general rule in such cases is, as emphatically laid down in Weld v. Green, 1 Fairf. 20. Mr. C. J. … See Tyler v. Ulmer, 12 Mass. R. 163 . Such a sum would be the amount- of injury sustained by the plaintiff; and that is the correct rule in the assessment of damages in such cases.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Franklin v. Maine Amusement Co.

    133 Me. 203 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1934

    Indermaur v. Dames, L. R. 1 C. P., 274; Mayhew v. Sullivan Mining Company, 76 Me., 100; Low v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, 72 Me., 313. … Low v. Grand Trunk Railway Company, supra. The case before us is with respect to the defendant’s negligence not unlike Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Leach v. French

    69 Me. 389 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1879

    Bray v. Mayne, Gow. 1, (5 E. C. L. R. 437.) … Deane v. Keate, 3 Camp. 4.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Buckley v. S.D. Warren Co.

    54 A.3d 1274 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 2012

    . [¶ 1] William Buckley appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer on remand after our decision in Buckley v. S.D. … See Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Durrell v. Franklin County Commissioners

    532 A.2d 146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 1987

    . § 1001 (1978 & Supp.1986) 4 ; State v. Lewisohn, 379 A.2d 1192, 1203 (Me.1977). … See Bolduc v. Androscoggin County Commissioners, 485 A.2d 655, 657-58 (Me.1984); Haskell v. Phinney, 460 A.2d 1354, 1357 (Me.1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.