Case law

United States v. Spinner

109 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2000

fact or to have taken steps to learn of Detective Brown’s similar misrepresentations in the past is a violation of either Brady v. … Judge Hogan concluded that even if the jury had never heard about Detective Brown’s Board certification as a pharmacist, “it is likely that they would still have credited his testimony since it was supported by twenty-five

L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

163 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1947

Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789, 791 . … Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538 , 61 S.Ct. 347 , 85 L.Ed. 327 ; Ziffrin, Inc. v. United States, 318 U.S. 73, 78 , 63 S.Ct. 465 , 87 L.Ed. 621 ; Ruppert v. Ruppert, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 65 , 134 F.2d 497 ; Schaff v. R.

Food Store Employees Union v. National Labor Relations Board

413 F.2d 407 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1969

Our review of this record reveals that the Board’s findings as to the unfair labor practices and lack of “good faith doubt” by the Company are supported by the record. Universal Camera Corp. v. … See e. g., NLRB v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); Franks Bros. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 702 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944); Phelps Dodge Corp. v.

Independent Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

516 F.2d 1206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1975

In First National Bank v. … BankAmerica Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 491 F.2d 985 (9th Cir. 1974), is not to be contrary.

Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 425, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Intervenor. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. National Labor Relations Board, Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 425, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

419 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1969

assertion of its jurisdiction even assuming applicability of the narrower standard suggested by Member Brown. … Indeed the Board's panel happened to consist of Chairman McCulloch and Members Brown and Zagoria, and there was no dissent. This controversy was not clearly a mere question of contract interpretation.

Lincoln Hockey, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

831 A.2d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2003

Brown, still at home in North Carolina, then visited Dr. Kenneth M. Carnes, a board-certified neurologist and team physician for the Carolina Hurricanes hockey team, on February 16, 1999. Dr. … See, e.g., Cuppett v. Covington & Burling, 1998 D.C. Wrk. Comp.

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

393 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1968

II The Board’s finding that the company’s no-solicitation rules unlawfully infringed upon employees’ rights is obviously correct. Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Allen Manufacturing Co., 6 Cir., 364 F.2d 814, 816 (1966); Anchor Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 300 F.2d 301, 303 (1962). We too find their use unobjectionable and within the competence of the Board.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

305 A.2d 861 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1973

Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., D.C.App., 288 A.2d 666 (1972). Petitioner contends the Board failed to carry out the court’s mandate. … We need not discuss these disputes here, however, because any such uncertainties were largely removed by this court’s subsequent opinion in Northeast Liquors, Inc. v.

Consumers Union of the U.S., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Board

938 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1991

Pursuant to that end, the Board is entitled to wide and respectful deference in its implementation of the statute. See Anderson Bros. Ford v. … And, of course, with respect to the interpretation of statutory ambiguities, the Board is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Dennis v. Lovett

104 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1952

Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 , decided March 13, 1950. … Thereafter a subsequent review was had by the Board of Review, and thereafter a further review was had by the Judicial Council.

Flemming v. United States

546 A.2d 1001 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1988

Brown likewise dropped a change purse to the ground. His arresting officer seized it and found that it contained nineteen plastic bags of cocaine. The officer also found a bag of cocaine and $59 in Brown’s pocket. … See Haynes v. District of Columbia, supra, 503 A.2d at 1223 ; Banker v.

Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

398 A.2d 13 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1979

Stewart v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973). … Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 541 (1972).

Bakers Local Union No. 118 v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

437 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1981

See Washington Ethical Society v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 421 A.2d 14, 16-17 (1980); Citizens Association of Georgetown, Inc. v. … Shay v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 175 , 178 n.10 (1975). .

United States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board

969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992

RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: In NLRB v. J. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board’s relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.

In re Wheeler

871 A.2d 476 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2005

State v. Manthey, 295 N.J.Super. 26 , 684 A.2d 517, 520 (App.Div.1996) (quoting Matter of lulo, 115 N.J. 498 , 559 A.2d 1349 (1989)). The defendant need not be proven to have acted with fraudulent intent. Id. … See In re Brown, Bar Docket No. 88-97, slip op. at 17-18 (BPR Dec. 10, 2003), adopted, 851 A.2d 1278 (D.C.2004) (per cu-riam).

Transport Workers Union Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

725 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1984

Petition for Review of an Order of the Civil Aeronautics board. Thomas L. Ray, Asst. Gen. Counsel, C.A.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Ivars V. Mellups, Acting Gen. Counsel and Barbara Thorson, Atty., C.A.B., Robert B. … See, e.g., Switchmen's Union v. NMB, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. Texas Int'l Airlines, 656 F.2d 16 (2d Cir.1981); Adams v.

International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Honorable Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

698 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1983

See International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Hon. Harold Brown, et al, No. 79-1074 (D.D.C. Aug. 6, 1981), reprinted in J.A. at 114 [hereinafter cited as District Court Opinion]. … See Blaha v.

Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

139 F. Supp. 3d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2015

Squires v. Brown, 604 F. Supp. 2d 236, 238 (D.D.C. 2006). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1019 (D.C. Cir. 2014); Cobb v. Howard Univ., 70 App. D.C. 339, 342 (D.C.Cir. 1939); Edinger v. Bd. of Regents of Morehead State Univ., 906 F.2d 1136, 1141 (6th Cir. 1990).

United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

317 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 1970

’s Union, Local 46 v. … However, the Courts have noted three exceptions: where Board action constituted a denial of constitutional rights, Fay v.

Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services

794 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1986

Dorsey v. Heckler, 702 F.2d 597, 602 (5th Cir.1983). … Narrol v. Heckler, 727 F.2d 1303, 1307 (D.C.Cir.1984); Diabo v. Secretary of Health, Education, & Welfare, 627 F.2d 278, 282 (D.C.Cir.1980).