Case law

Blumhagen v. Clackamas County

91 Or. App. 510 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988

ORS 659.415; ORS 659.420; ORS 659.425. 1 The trial court found for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. 2 We review de novo, Brown v. City of Portland, 80 Or App 464 , 722 P2d 1282 , rev den 302 Or 460 (1986), and affirm. … Brown v. City of Portland, supra, 80 Or App at 469 . (Emphasis supplied.) See also Quinn v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 76 Or App 617, 632 , 711 P2d 139 (1985), rev den 300 Or 546 (1986).

Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2016

A properly graded No. 2 board should have been able to hold the weight that Kevin placed on the board. … Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405, 848 P2d 1194 (1993); see also Brown v.

State v. Goin

556 P.3d 663 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2024

See Brown v. Zenon, 133 Or App 291, 295, 891 P2d 666 (1995) (“[J]urisdiction attaches when a child is taken into protective custody. ORS 419B.157; ORS 419C.094. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.

State v. Chapman

107 Or. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

The state argues that the rule would be consistent with the per se exigency rule, recognized in State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986), for searches of mobile vehicles. … See State v. Girard, 276 Or 511 , 514 n 2, 555 P2d 445 (1976); State v. Heikkinen, supra, n 3, 94 Or App at 475. *333 In State v.

State v. Mitchell

35 Or. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1978

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471 , 83 S Ct 407 , 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963). Miranda v. … The sentencing judge, the district attorney, the sheriff and the arresting agency shall give the board such information and indicate to the board what, in their judgment, should be the duration of such convicted person’s

Quatama Park Townhomes Owners Ass'n v. RBC Real Estate Fin., Inc.

365 F. Supp. 3d 1129 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 18, 2019

Brown v. Or. State Bar , 293 Or. 446 , 451, 648 P.2d 1289 (1982). The two Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct ("RPC") most relevant to the pending dispute are RPC 1.9 and RPC 1.13. … Application In Christensen v.

Fitzpatrick v. Dubois

9 F. Cas. 193 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 26, 1873

1S55 and 1856, as follows: Hall of one hundred acres; Smith of one hundred and seventy acres, and Brown of fifty acres. … In Chapman v. School Dist.

State ex rel. Umatilla County v. Hawks

110 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924

Banfield, 43 Or. 287 ( 72 Pac. 1093 ); Murphy v. Salem, 49 Or. 54 ( 87 Pac. 532 ). … In 1909, the legislative assembly approved an act creating boards in certain counties and ^vesting in such boards the management of the jails and prisons in their respective counties.

State v. Galloway

202 Or. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2005

ORAP 5.45(1); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … The state counters that State v.

Eldred v. Burns

182 Or. 394 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1947

Brown v. Cain , 56 F. Supp. 56 , is cited to the same effect. This case is most interesting. There the temporary Coast Guardsmen were guarding a war time industry at Chester, Pennsylvania. … State v. Rader , 94 Or. 432 , 186 P. 79 ; State v. Doris , 51 Or. 136 , 94 P. 44 , 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) *Page 414 660; State v. Thompson , 49 Or. 46 , 88 P. 583 ; State v. Tarter , supra.

State v. Hammang

19 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1974

In State v. … In State v.

State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

125 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1928

Hildebrand v. Feldschau, supra, and the case at bar. … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

Bechtold v. Wilson

182 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1947

Brown v. City of Portland, 120 Or. 76 , 249 P. 819 (1926), opinion by Mr. Justice Belt, is a reversion to the doctrine of Garnsey v. County Court, McAnish v. Grant, Farrow v. Nevin, and McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. … S., Certiorari, 332, § 188; Winn v. Freele, 19 Ala. 171 ; Okerlind v. Fyke, 90 Ill. App. 192 ; Jacobs v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal. App. (2d) 359, 75 P. (2d) 96 .

Waisanen v. Clatskanie School District 6J

229 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 2009

In State v. … In Wiggett v.

Hendricks v. Portland Electric Power Co.

134 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1930

Tonkin, 124 Or. 534 ( 264 P. 863 ); Wells v. Clark & Wilson Lumber Co., 114 Or. 297 ( 235 P. 283 ); Shepherd v. Inman-Poulsen Lumber Co., 86 Or. 652 ( 168 P. 601 ); Spain v. O.-W. R. & N. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Jussila v. Sause Bros. Ocean Towing Co.

266 Or. 136 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1973

In Barrell v. … See, e.g., Barrell v. Brown, supra. Whatever may be said for the continuing vitality of the Walker doctrine, we find in this case no occasion to apply that rule.

Clark v. City of Albany

142 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 17, 1996

Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of Wheeler, 141 Or App 166, 180 , 917 P2d 61 (1996); Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438, 441-42 , 722 P2d 739 (1986). … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citation omitted).

Investment Service Co. v. North Pacific Lumber Co.

261 Or. 43 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1972

Accord, Rogue River Management Co. v. Shaw, 243 Or 54, 59 , 411 P2d 440 (1966). Koffman v. Modern-Imperial Company, 239 Cal App2d 135, 48 Cal Rptr 492 (1966), is a decision illustrating the principle. … Jefferson Union Co. v. American Radiator & S. S.

Jones v. SAIF Corp.

123 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Jefferson v. Sam’s Cafe, 123 Or App 464 , 861 P2d 359 (1993).

In Re Herdman's Estate

167 Or. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1941

Barzee, 96 Or. 357, 371 , 190 P. 141 ; Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 315, 317 , 33 P. 557 . The rule is no different when the trial is before the court without a jury. 64 C. J. Trial 1213, § 1028. … before the death of his wife, but came from Los Angeles to Portland at his request and did all the work of a housekeeper, including labor of a menial character, in a twelve-room house in which another brother lived and paid board