Case law

Alfonso v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR

89 N.J. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 26, 1982

The Appellate Division rejected these arguments and affirmed the decision of the Board. Alfonso v. Board of Review, Department of Labor and Industry, 176 N.J.Super. 492 (1980). … In DaLomba v.

Kelly v. Burlington County Board of Elections

207 N.J. Super. 335 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1985

Following the 1984 general election, the Burlington County Election Board (“board”) has insisted upon a manual count and tabulation of these ballots. … The board of elections, not the board of freeholders, is responsible for counting and canvassing votes cast by such ballots.

Bentley v. Board of Adjustment of Lawrence

123 N.J.L. 556 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1940

Prosecutors then sought and obtained a writ of certiorari to review the action of the Board of Adjustment. We are of the opinion that the action of the Board should be set aside. … Cf. 179 Duncan Avenue Corp. v. Jersey City, 122 N. J. L. 292; 5 Atl. Rep. (2d) 68; Spur Distributing Co., Inc., v. Bridgeton, 122 N. J. L. 460; 6 Atl. Rep. (2d) 192.

Township Committee v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

200 N.J. Super. 317 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1985

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Wooding

5 N.J. Misc. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

Mc Gorty v. Weehawken Board of Education

79 N.J. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 14, 1979

Board of Education v. Englewood Teachers' Ass'n

75 N.J. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1977

Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education

74 N.J. 264 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 5, 1977

State v. Board of Commissioners of Highways

36 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1873

This case was argued with the State, Winans and Abry v. Crane, Collector, but in it an additional question is raised, as to the right of Cahill to prosecute this certiorari. … Cited in Maxwell v. Goetschius, 11 Vr. 383 ; Lister v. Newark Plank Road Co., 9 Stew. Eq. 477.

Bannon v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

9 N.J. Misc. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1931

Bechman v. Board Public Utility Commissioners, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 102. The provisions of Pamph. … It therefore seems that since the present operators lack the approval of the board, and do not fall within the exception indicated in the statute above cited, that the action of the board was proper, and the rule must be

Feldman & Pivnick, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 520 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1928

The board was also given power to administer oaths and compel attendance of witnesses. Such board, when it acts, acts judicially on a lawful ascertainment of facts. Bilt-Wel Co. v. Dowling, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 180. … R. 96), and there is a further presumption that the action of the board was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801.

Park & Prospect, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 804 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928

Under this writ we are asked to reverse the judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of Orange, refusing to prosecutor a permit to erect an apartment house. Bellofatto et al. v. Montclair, 6 N. J. Mis.

Bogue Electric Co. v. Board of Review

20 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1956

Newark Aqueduct Board v. City of Passaic

46 N.J. Eq. 552 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1890

I think it is entirely clear, from the acts of the legislature relating to the Newark Aqueduct Board, that the city had a grant from the state of a right in the waters of the Passaic beyond those rights inherent in riparian … Eor reversal — Depue, Brown — 2.

John Agnew Co. v. Board of Education

83 N.J. Eq. 339 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

General Omnibus Co. v. Board of Commissioners

96 N.J.L. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1921

There were delays on account of legal proceedings (see Public Service Railway Co. v. General Omnibus Co., 93 N. J. … State v. Fox, 25 N. J. L. 566.

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark

119 N.J.L. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1937

and revision of taxes, and then proceeded to appoint certain persons as members of those boards. … Eor the reasons stated in Murphy v. Ellenstein et al., 119 N. J. L. 159, of the present term, this may be done only on direct attack by quo warranto and not indirectly on ceriiorari.

Murphy v. Essex County Board of Taxation

129 N.J.L. 218 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1942

The County Board held that Newark was not the municipality where personal property of the defendant could be assessed for taxation under B. … In the state of facts evidenced in this case, the language of the Court of Errors and Appeals in City of Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 129 N. J.

City of Camden v. Local Government Board

125 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 1940

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Dussinger

109 N.J.L. 346 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1932