Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

7.11s

  • Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    170 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

    Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al., cause No. 24271, this day decided ( 179 Okla. 517 , 41 P. [2d] 453 ), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Goff

    295 P.2d 795 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1956

    As in the Bickel v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co. case, supra, the governing board in the instant case determined the validity of the petitions or applications for the issuance of the bonds. … The assessment was not void as in Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.C. 435 , 81 S.E. 611 , and like cases. This appealing defendant has no legal status to attack this assessment; it is res judicata.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Millar

    21 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1908

    Justice Brown in the case of Davis v. Burke, 179 U. S. 399 , 21 Sup. Ct. 210, 45 L. Ed. 249 : “Where a constitutional provision is complete in itself it needs no further legislation to put it in force. … It is held in Talley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191 , that the expression “public utility” is synonymous with “public use.” In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • In Re the Assessment for the Year 2000 of Certain Property Owned by Oneok Field Services Gathering, LLC

    38 P.3d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 2001

    Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . . Id. . In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 1914 OK 261 , 43 Okla. 307 , 142 P. 997 . . Oklahoma Industries Authority v. … McLoud Telephone Company v. State Board of Equalization, 1982 OK 154 , 655 P.2d 1037 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-129 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1975

    Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 and Brown v. … State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 set forth the applicable rule of statutory construction as follows: "Public officers have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayes v. State

    65 O.B.A.J. 2808 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1994

    v. … See Brown v. State, 871 P.2d 56, 68 (Okl.Cr.1994) (propositions of error submitted for the first time in supplemental briefs deemed waived for consideration on direct appeal).

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • State Nat. Bank v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

    72 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1919

    This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from an order of the county board of equalization, made in pursuance of the mandate of the state board of equalization. … This statute was under consideration in Bretz v. El Reno State Bank, 71 Okla. 283 , 177 Pac. 362 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prince v. State

    648 P.2d 48 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1982

    Hamm also retrieved a brown sack, which he testified was in plain view, from the console between the bucket seats. … Sandersfield v. State, 461 P.2d 1019 (Okl.Cr.1969), is distinguishable.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arner v. State

    54 Okla. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1932

    , near this cafe; that defendant called to Browning, and Browning stepped out to tbe car, resting bis arm on tbe car door and placing one of his feet on the running board; that suddenly an altercation began; that Browning … In Gransden v. State, 12 Okla.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McElhiney v. Lewis

    88 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1923

    Lewis, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the district court of Harper county against the board of county commissioners to recover the sum of $250, alleged to be the balance due him as salary as county attorney of said … Then follows a provision making it the duty of the State Board of Equalization to issue to the board of county commissioners, of the last named class of counties, a certificate of that fact. *211 The plaintiff's petition

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SFF-TIR, LLC v. Stephenson

    250 F. Supp. 3d 856 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 25, 2017

    McEntire v. Kmart Corp., No. CIV 09-0567 JB/LAM, 2010 WL 553443 , at *3 (D.N.M. Feb. 9, 2010) (Browning, J.)(citing Strawbridge v. … See Johnson v. Holmes, 377 F.Supp.2d 1039, 1044-45 (D.N.M. 2004)(Browning, J.)

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • KENKEL v. PARKER

    362 P.3d 1145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2015

    Brown, see note 11, supra; Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Goforth, 1943 OK 244, 110 , 143 P.2d 154, 156 . … Fanning v. Brown, see note 11, supra; Saut bine v. Keller, see note 11, supra; State ex rel. Okla. Employment Sec. Com'n v. Tulsa Flower Exchange, see note 11, supra. . Fanning v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bowen v. Tucker

    164 P.3d 1155 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 2007

    Board of County Comm'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 1984 OK 6, ¶ 36 , 29 P.2d 75, 78 . … See Board of County Comm'rs of Rogers County v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Transok Pipe Line Company

    552 P.2d 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1976

    In Ossman v. … Other authorities supporting this rule are: Dickinson v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 137 F.2d 615 (10 Cor. 1943); Vinson v. Oklahoma City, 179 Okl. 590 , 66 P.2d 933 (1937), and Colclazier v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • FIRST PRYORITY BANK v. MOON

    2014 OK CIV APP 21 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 2013

    MOON, an individual, and NLCO, INC., Defendants/Appellants, RANDALL BROWN, Intervenor/Appellant, The Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, and the Tulsa County Treasurer, Defendants. … Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Payne County v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

    185 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1939

    WELCH, V. O. J. This appeal presents the question of whether section 12313, O. S. 1931, 68 Okla. St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dale v. Board of Education of the City of Guthrie

    51 Okla. 592 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1915

    The jury found in favor of the board of education, and- gave judgment for the plaintiffs for the sum of $100, the amount tendered by the board. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Madill v. Bd. Com'rs Marshall Cty.

    177 Okla. 351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1936

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parkerson v. Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 2, 2023

    To state a claim, 1 Monell v. Dept. of Soc. … See Rife v. Okla. Dept. of Public Safety, 854 F.3d 637, 653–54 (10th Cir. 2017). 3 See Chichakli v. Samuels, No. CIV-15-687-D, 2016 WL 2743542, at *4 (W.D. Okla. May 11, 2016); Foltz v. Grady Cnty. Bd. of Cnty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Young v. City of Holdenville

    384 P.2d 905 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1963

    . ■ ; The first two of these are Robinson v. Board of County Commissioners of Hughes Co., Okl., 289 P.2d 668 , and Cravatt v. City of Oklahoma City, Okl., 295 P.2d 807 . … Brown & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.