Case law

Olson v. STATE MORTUARY AND CEMETERY BD.

230 Or. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 19, 2009

The legislature further authorized the board to investigate any complaint concerning a licensee and, if the board finds that the licensee violated any applicable industry standards, authorized the board to impose a civil … See Advocates for Effective Regulation v.

State v. Lebanno

314 Or. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2021

State v. … State v.

Nesbit v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists

291 Or. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

Based on our recent decision in King v. Dept. of Public Safety Standards , 289 Or. … Petitioner did not file timely exceptions to the board's order but did file a petition for reconsideration, which the board denied.

Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTY

36 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1978

In sum, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings of fact, and therefore we are bound by them. ORS 34.040(3); Green v. … See also, 1000 Friends v. Benton County, 32 Or App 413 , 575 P2d 651 , rev den 584 Or 1371 (1978). Petitioners’ reliance on the LCDC decision in 1000 Friends v.

In re Crum

103 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1922

People v. Amos, 246 Ill. 299 ( 92 N. E. 857 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 239 ). … People v. Amos, supra, note, 138 Am. St. Rep., page 243. *302 In People v. MacCabe, 18 Colo. 186 ( 32 Pac. 280 , 36 Am. St. Rep. 270 , 19 L. R.

Temple v. Osburn

55 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1910

Brown, and it could not possibly have any greater effect—Price v. Sisson, 13 N. J. … Pancoast v. Duval, 26 N. J. Eq. 445, 448; Dickerson v. *511 Tillinghast, 4 Paige, 215 ( 25 Am. Dec. 528 ) ; Mingus v. Condit, 28 N. J. Eq. 318; Cary v. White, 52 N. Y. 139 ; Wells v. Morrow, 38 Ala. 125 . 5.

Heisley v. Eastman

102 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

Brown could not: Shaw v. … A. 484); McBroom v. Thompson, 25 Or. 559, 566 ( 37 Pac. 57 , 42 Am. St. Rep. 806 ); Shaw v. Proffitt, 57 Or. 192, 212 ( 109 Pac. 584 , 110 Pac. 1092 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 63); Kelsey v.

Municipal Security Co. v. Baker County

39 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1901

So, too, in Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487 (1 Sup. … See, also, Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 ; Willis v. Board of Com’rs, 86 Fed. 872 ( 30 C. C. A. 445 ). 2.

Smith v. Department of Corrections

105 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1990

See Clark v. Schumacher, 103 Or App 1, 4 , 795 P2d 1093 (1990).

Still v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF MARION CTY.

42 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 17, 1979

from Meeker v. … See also the denial of the petition for review in 1000 Friends v.

United States v. Shofner Iron & Steel Works

71 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 6, 1947

BROWN, District Judge. … The case of Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. J. G.

Aichele v. Blue Elephant Holdings, LLC

292 F. Supp. 3d 1104 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2017

After the video was turned off, Plaintiff continued yelling at Brown and used profanity. *1108 Brown was considered the assistant manager of the store. … Ray , 217 F.3d at 1244 (citing Yartzoff v. Thomas , 809 F.2d 1371 , 1376 (9th Cir. 1987) ). See also Passantino v.

Lange v. St. Johns Lumber Co.

115 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1925

Phillips v. Library Co., 55 N. J. L. 307, 310 ( 27 Atl. 478, 479 ). In Kelley v. … Brown, Rand and Belt, JJ., concur.

Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.

86 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1917

In Brown v. Buffalo etc. R. Co., 27 Hun (N. … We infer that Brown v. Buffalo etc. R. Co., 27 Hun (N. Y.), 342, was also a case involving the rights of preferred stock. The case of Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige (N. Y.), 222, 231 ( 24 Am.

King v. Miller

53 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1908

Law (2 ed.), 882; Brown v. Scott, 25 Cal. 189 ; Heisen v. Smith, 138 Cal. 216 ( 71 Pac. 180 : 94 Am. St. Rep. 39 ; Bolen v. Crosby, 49 N. Y., 183 . 2. … Hawes, Parties, § 34; Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Allen v. Brown, 44 N. Y. 228 ; Curtin v. Kowalsky, 145 Cal. 431 ( 78 Pac. 962 ).

Putnam v. Norblad

134 Or. 433 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1930

Rep. 284 ); Gaines v. Thompson, 74 U. S. (7 Wall.), 347; Moses on Mandamus, 80; Enterprise Savings Assn. v. Zumstein, 15 Cir. Ct. App. 153 ( 67 Fed. 1000 ); Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 U. S. 541 . … Belt, Brown and Rand, JJ., concur in the result.

West v. Kozer

104 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1922

L. 436 ( 92 Atl. 85 , 94 Atl. 85 ); Sexton v. Newark Dist. Telegraph Co., 84 N. J. L. 83-100, 86 Atl. 451 ); Gooding v. Ott, 77 W. Va. 487 ( 87 S. E. 862 , L. R. A. 1916D, 637). … Justice Brown took no part in hearing or decision of these cases.

In re Ramirez

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2018

The Culp v. … Lenske, 269 Or at 164; see also State v.

State v. Andersen

361 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2017

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 274 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). … See State v.

Greisen v. Hanken

252 F. Supp. 3d 1042 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 12, 2017

Brown was not involved in this investigation. … See Ellins, 710 F.3d at 1065 (stating that the right was established in 1968 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pickering v. Board of Education).