Case law

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 2010

Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997) (citation omitted). … X , § 14(A) ; Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n , 635 P.2d 1010 , 1016 (Okla. 1981) ; Burkhardt v. City of Enid , 771 P.2d 608 , 611 (Okla. 1989) ; State ex rel. Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997).

London Square Village v. OKLAHOMA CTY. EQUALIZATION AND EXCISE BD.

559 P.2d 1224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1976

Beerman v. Board of Tax Appeals, 152 Ohio St. 179 , 87 N.E.2d 474 [1949]; Methodist River Oaks Apartments, Inc. v. City of Waco, 409 S.W.2d 485 [Tex.Civ.App.1966]. … Board of Equalization v. Bonner, 185 Okl. 431 , 93 P.2d 1077 ; Dairy Queen of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 205 Okl. 473 , 238 P.2d 800 . Judgment of trial court affirmed. *1227 HODGES, V. C.

Equalization Bd. Okla. Cty. v. Ford Motor

177 Okla. 583 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

Defendants contend that plaintiff’s only remedy is by appeal from the decision of the equalization board, this upon the theory that the matter was heard and determined by that board. … The board here refused to hear and determine, and therefore there was no determination from which to appeal. As concerns the legal questions involved, this case has much in common with State ex rel. v.

State Ex Rel. Hales v. Public Service Co.

187 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

In Smith v. … Co. v.

Pine v. State Industrial Com.

148 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1931

See, also, Schild v. Pere Marquette R. Co. (1918) 200 Mich. 614 , 166 N. W. 1018 ; Podkastelnea v. Mich. Cent. R. Co. (1917) 164 N. W. 418 ; Brown v. Weston-Mott Co., 202 Mich. 592 , 168 N. W. 437 ; Stein v. … Haiseldon v. Indus. Bo. of Ill. (Ill.) 113 N. E. 877 ; Conway v. Indus. Board (Ill.) 118 N. E. 705 ; Moustgaard v. Indus. Comm. (Ill.) 122 N. E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Indus. Bo. (Ill.) 114 N.

Choctaw & the Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County

239 F. Supp. 650 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1965

Also see Whitman v. Harrison et al., Okl., 327 P.2d 680 , and Rose v. Cook, 207 Okl. 582 , 250 P.2d 848 . In Lindauer v. … In deciding the case, the Court relied on McClain v.

YERTON v. CITY OF TULSA

2023 OK CIV APP 18 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

YERTON v. … Fanning v. Brown , , ¶ 4, , 844. This Court "must take as true all of the challenged pleading's allegations together with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from them." Id .

Black v. State

47 Okla. Crim. 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1930

Brown v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 1 , 266 Pac. 491 . As we read the evidence, Brown was reluctant to connect defendant with any knowledge that they were going to' Jet to commit a robbery. … I spilled a sack full of dollars down on the floor of the board of the car. “Q. It was necessary for her to draw a conclusion then that a bank had been robbed, wasn’t it? A. We told her then. “Q.

Vertex Holdings, LLC v. Cranke

217 P.3d 120 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2008

See Smith v. … v.

Griffin v. Thomas

86 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1922

Among the latter are Ashley v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Fed. 55 ; Speer v. Board of County Commissioners of Kearney County, 88 Fed. 749 ; State ex rel. v. Town of Dover, 62 N. J. L. 138; The Coast Co. v. … Caldwell v. Hooker, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Leedy v. Brown, 27 Okla. 487 , 113 Pac. 177 ; Atwater v. Hassett, 27 Okla. 292 , 111 Pac. 802 ; In re Lee, 64 Okla. 310 , 168 Pac. 58 ; Dunlap v.

Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n

624 P.2d 1049 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1981

It should first be presented to the Board of Governors. … In re Integration of State Bar of Oklahoma, 185 Okl. 505 , 95 P.2d 113 [1939]; Ford v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, Okl., 431 P.2d 423 [1967]. 4 .

State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Millar

21 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1908

Justice Brown in the case of Davis v. Burke, 179 U. S. 399 , 21 Sup. Ct. 210, 45 L. Ed. 249 : “Where a constitutional provision is complete in itself it needs no further legislation to put it in force. … It is held in Talley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191 , that the expression “public utility” is synonymous with “public use.” In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am.

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Lincoln County

185 Okla. 435 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

This cause was tried in the Court of Tax Review under the same record as made, in Excise Board of Lincoln County et al. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. et al., No. 29120, 185 Okla. 436 , 93 P.2d 1081 . … J., and WELCH, V. C. J., dissent.

In Re the Assessment for the Year 2000 of Certain Property Owned by Oneok Field Services Gathering, LLC

38 P.3d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . . Id. . In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 1914 OK 261 , 43 Okla. 307 , 142 P. 997 . . Oklahoma Industries Authority v. … McLoud Telephone Company v. State Board of Equalization, 1982 OK 154 , 655 P.2d 1037 .

Mayes v. State

65 O.B.A.J. 2808 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1994

v. … See Brown v. State, 871 P.2d 56, 68 (Okl.Cr.1994) (propositions of error submitted for the first time in supplemental briefs deemed waived for consideration on direct appeal).

Bd. of Trustees of Town of Taloga v. Hadson Etc.

574 P.2d 1038 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1978

Town believes these townsites must be treated in a different manner than a platting created after the land was already settled, citing Brown v. Parker, 2 Okl. 258 , 39 P. 567 (1894). … In Folsom v.

Prince v. State

648 P.2d 48 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1982

Hamm also retrieved a brown sack, which he testified was in plain view, from the console between the bucket seats. … Sandersfield v. State, 461 P.2d 1019 (Okl.Cr.1969), is distinguishable.

SFF-TIR, LLC v. Stephenson

250 F. Supp. 3d 856 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 25, 2017

McEntire v. Kmart Corp., No. CIV 09-0567 JB/LAM, 2010 WL 553443 , at *3 (D.N.M. Feb. 9, 2010) (Browning, J.)(citing Strawbridge v. … See Johnson v. Holmes, 377 F.Supp.2d 1039, 1044-45 (D.N.M. 2004)(Browning, J.)

Arner v. State

54 Okla. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1932

, near this cafe; that defendant called to Browning, and Browning stepped out to tbe car, resting bis arm on tbe car door and placing one of his feet on the running board; that suddenly an altercation began; that Browning … In Gransden v. State, 12 Okla.

KENKEL v. PARKER

362 P.3d 1145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2015

Brown, see note 11, supra; Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Goforth, 1943 OK 244, 110 , 143 P.2d 154, 156 . … Fanning v. Brown, see note 11, supra; Saut bine v. Keller, see note 11, supra; State ex rel. Okla. Employment Sec. Com'n v. Tulsa Flower Exchange, see note 11, supra. . Fanning v.