Case law

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Board of Commissioners

122 N.J.L. 240 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1939

The ordinance under consideration is modeled closely after an ordinance of the city of Trenton in pari materia, which was considered by this court in Giant Tiger Corp. et al. v. Board of Commissioners of Trenton, 11 N. … There is a long line of such cases, and for present purposes it is sufficient to cite Richards v. Hammer, 42 N. J. L. 435; 44 Id. 667, 671, and Alexander v.

Limongelli v. New Jersey State Board of Dentistry

137 N.J. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1993

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 557 (1972) (footnote omitted). … In Brown v.

BROWN v. WARREN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 1, 2024

(quoting Pansy v. … Pansy v.

Resnick v. East Brunswick Township Board of Education

144 N.J. Super. 474 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1976

North Plainfield Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

95 N.J. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1983

Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders

94 N.J. 422 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 1983

Compare id. with Cullum v. Board of Educ. of N. Bergen Tp., 15 N.J. 285 (1954), and Grogan v. DeSapio, 11 N.J. 308 (1953) (overturning municipal action where there was detailed proof of the abuse of discretion). … Ringwood Solid Waste Management Auth. v.

Board of Education v. Buena Regional Education Ass'n

300 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1997

Although the Commissioner and State Board of Education have primary responsibility for the interpretation and administration of the State’s education laws, see Abbott v. … In Accardi v. Pennsylvania R.R.

Willingboro Board of Education v. Willingboro Education Ass'n

87 N.J. 320 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1981

McMillon v. Board of Trustees of Kean College

82 N.J. 270 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1979

Board of Education v. Matawan Regional Teachers Ass'n

77 N.J. 495 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1978

Shaw Realty Co. v. Rent Control Board & Council

77 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1978

Long Branch Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

75 N.J. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1977

Sands v. Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

46 N.J. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1966

BROWN v. WILLIAMS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 14, 2024

BROWN, HONORABLE KAREN M. … Petruska v. Gannon Univ., 462 F.3d 294, 302 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir. 1977)).

Van Riper v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

137 N.J.L. 714 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

If that was so an inquiry into the acts of the board itself could be effectively prevented. … In Hudson County v.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Jones

4 N.J. Misc. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1926

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 131 Atl. Rep. 89 .

Margate Civic Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners

132 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1975

Local boards considering applications for such transfers are invested by our Legislature with wide discretion, and their principal guide in making a determination is the public interest. Id., 303; Lubliner v. … Fanwood v. Rocco, 33 N. J. 404, 414 (1960).

Weymouth Township Board of Education v. Wolf

178 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1981

Plaintiff alleges that it was defamed by reason of certain remarks published by defendants, the substance of which indicates that the board misused, lost or possibly embezzled substantial school board funds. … State v. Time, Inc., supra; Reilly v. Curtiss, 83 N.J.L. 77 (Sup.Ct.1912). It is the conclusion of the court, therefore, that the principles outlined in Chicago v.

Crescent Bottling Works v. Board of Pharmacy

121 N.J. Eq. 237 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1937

Stat. pp. 3943, 3946) and so not within the prohibitory language of section 3 of that act; and prayed that the board of pharmacy, its agents, etc., be restrained “from interfering with the business of complainant in the sale

Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

192 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2007

R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 25 , 527 A.2d 843 (1987)). … In 1988, we applied the Kane standard in the companion cases of Maynard, v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A.2d 1213 (1988), and Ciecwisz v.