Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.91s
95 Mo. App. 162 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1902
The measure of damages is the compensation for the loss - actually sustained prior to the suit, by reason of the nuisance. ’ ’ Citing, Carson v. Springfield, 53 Mo. 289 ; Pinney v. Berry, 61 Mo. App. 359 ; *166 Brown v. … Railway, 45 Mo. 221 ; Van Hoosier v. Railway, 70 Mo. 145 ; Dickson v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 575 ; Benson v. Railway, 78 Mo. 504 ; Brown v. Railway, 80 Mo. 457 ; Smith v. Railway, 98 Mo. 20 ; Bielman v. Railway, 50 Mo.
Cited 6 timesPublished246 S.W.2d 513 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1952
Williams v. Williams, 240 Mo.App. 336 , 205 S.W.2d 949 . … Williams v. Williams, supra.
Cited 30 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Davis v. City of St. John
230 S.W.3d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2007
Brown v. Shaw, 129 S.W.3d 372 , 374 n. 2 (Mo. banc 2004). … Delay v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 174 S.W.3d 662, 664 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). 2 . Appellant did not move for expedited review of the appeal.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Sander v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Creve Coeur
60 S.W.3d 14 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2001
For this appeal, we review Board’s findings and conclusions, instead of those issued by the circuit court. State ex rel. Teefey v. … In ascertaining whether substantial evidence exists to support Board’s decision, we view the evidence, and reasonable inferences from the evidence, in the light most favorable to Board’s decision. Id; Behrens v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedV. S. DiCarlo General Contractors, Inc. v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority
564 S.W.2d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1978
Myers v. … In Personal Finance Co. of Missouri v.
Cited 5 timesPublished572 S.W.2d 899 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1978
No. 11 v. Snider, 470 S.W.2d 805, 809 (Mo.App.1971). In State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Hough v. … In an earlier chapter of Eckley, England v.
Cited 3 timesPublished153 Mo. App. 458 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1911
Bowen v. Lazalere, 44 Mo. 385 ; Hyatt v. Wolfe, 22 Mo. App. l. c. 201. … [Maine Bank v. Smith, 18 Me. 100 ; Whitwell v. Johnson, 17 Mass. 451 ; Bank v. Brown, 22 Me. 295 .] Such usage and custom may be shown to modify the general law merchant as applicable to such bank. [Bank v. L.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. St. Joseph Water Co. v. Geiger
246 Mo. 74 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1912
Waterworks Co., 95 Iowa, 348 ; Mayor, etc., of City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Water Co., 42 So. (Ala.) 10; Indiana Ry. Co. v. Hoffman, 161 Ind. 593 ; People v. Detroit United Ry., 162 Mich. 460 .] In the St. … Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished145 Mo. 630 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 17, 1898
fence,” which said post and board fence com- *0 *633 menced at the south end of said lot 12 at a point seventeen feet five inches east of the southwest corner and runs thence northerly to the north line of said lot 12 and … Sweet v. Owens, 109 Mo. 1 ; Bartlett v. Brown, 121 Mo. 353 . Pully concurring in the -judgment of the circuit court it is affirmed. Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCroy v. Zalma Reorganized School District R-V of Bollinger County
434 S.W.2d 517 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1968
Board of County Com’rs of Delta County v. … Brown v. Fagan, 71 Mo. 563 ; Barrett, Fitch, North & Co. v. Hudson, Mo.App., 403 S.W.2d 944, 947 [2]. The court properly refused to reform this quitclaim deed.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDavenport v. King Electric Co.
242 Mo. 111 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912
Jefferson, 77 Mo. l. c. 138; State v. Doyle, 107 Mo. l. c. 42; State v. Nelson, 132 Mo. 184 ; State v. Brown, 209 Mo. l. c. 419; State v. … [Geismann *124 v. Mo. Edison Elec. Co., 173 Mo. l. c. 674; Young v. Waters-Pierce Oil Co., 185 Mo. l. c. 664; Ryan v. St. L. Transit Co., 190 Mo. l. c. 634; Von Trebra v. Gaslight Co., 209 Mo. l. c. 659; Clark v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Motor Serv. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.
339 Mo. 469 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1936
This conclusion, we think, finds support, in principle, in Brown Bennett v. Powers, 146 Iowa 729 . … In Brown Bennett v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Johns
507 S.W.2d 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1974
Appel v. … See also Miller v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 120 N.J.Law 172 , 198 A. 848 (1938); and Commonwealth v. King, 54 Mass. 115, 119 (1847). Brown, et al. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState ex rel. City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. Barker
755 S.W.2d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1988
that the Circuit Court of Christian County was determined to be a permissible venue in which a discharged employee of the City of Springfield could file a petition for review of the decision of the Springfield Personnel Board … City of Springfield v. Crouch, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Payton v. City of Riverside
640 S.W.2d 137 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1982
At a regular Board meeting August 19,1980, the Board adopted Ordinance 80-22. … Mackey v.
Cited 12 timesPublished245 S.W.3d 229 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 2008
Bell Tel. v. Brown, 795 S.W.2d 385, 388 (Mo. banc 1990). 10 The plain and ordinary meaning of the statute also promotes efficiency within the judicial system. … See Tealin Co. v. City of Ladue, 541 S.W.2d 544, 548 (Mo. banc 1976); Strandberg v. Kansas City, 415 S.W.2d 737, 742 (Mo. banc 1967). 9 . In Bowman v.
Cited 50 timesPublished918 S.W.2d 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996
See Roberson v. … Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 154 (Mo.1969); Matyska at 700 . It is equally clear that these statements assert facts rather than opinions.
Cited 32 timesPublished152 S.W.3d 275 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 2005
Sanders v. … Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). [2] Colegrove v. Green 328 U.S. 549, 556 , 66 S.Ct. 1198 , 90 L.Ed. 1432 (1946); O'Brien v. Brown, 409 U.S. 1, 5 , 92 S.Ct. 2718 , 34 L.Ed.2d 1 (1972); State ex rel.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSt. Louis Teachers Union, Local 420 ex rel. Franklin v. Board of Education
921 S.W.2d 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1996
Louis Teachers Union, Local 420, AFT, AFL-CIO and Sandra Cothran, class representative on behalf of the employees of the Board of Education of the City of St. … Louis (Board), appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court in a declaratory judgment action against the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 Mo. 207 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1905
[State v. Raymond, 156 Mo. 118 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 .] … [Baker v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 533 ; Christian v. Ins. Co., 143 Mo. l. c. 468; Flowers v. Helm, 29 Mo. 324 ; State v. Frazier, 137 Mo. 317 ; R. S. 1899, sec. 2535.] III.
Disapproved — as noted by a later courtCited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna