Case law

Harvey v. United States

214 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 31, 1962

I am satisfied that under the tests laid down in United States v. Korpan, 354 U.S. 271 , 77 S.Ct. 1099 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1337 ; United States v. Nine Gambling Devices, 52-2 T.C. ¶257 (S.D.Ill.1957); and Turner v. … The Director cites United States v. Brown, 156 F.Supp. 121 (W.D.Iowa 1957) as authority to support his assessment of the special tax upon the “Rainbow Stamp” machine.

Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

352 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2012

McCall v. … To the same effect is Stroh v.

Gomez v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2018

See ORS 144.223(1) (authorizing a psychiatric or psychological examination to assist the board). Appellate courts review the board's determination for substantial evidence. See ORS 144.335(3). … Because the board reasonably could have concluded that there were legitimate reasons to defer petitioner's release, I also would deny review.

Lane County Assessor v. Mm Cattle Co., Tc-Md 110187c (or.tax 6-23-2011)

Oregon Tax Court · Jun 23, 2011

Taxpayer was represented at BOPTA by John Brown (Brown), a licensed real estate broker and state certified appraiser. The parties agree that the Assessor filed its Complaint with this court this court on March 17, 2011. … Many of those cases are set out in Lane County Assessor v. Robert S.

North Pacific Insurance v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance

200 Or. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

May v. … For instance, in Wisbey v. Nationwide Mut. Ins.

State v. Waldron

298 Or. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2019

See State v. Lewis , 236 Or. … See State v. Carr , 215 Or.

Municipal Security Co. v. Baker County

39 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1901

So, too, in Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487 (1 Sup. … See, also, Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 ; Willis v. Board of Com’rs, 86 Fed. 872 ( 30 C. C. A. 445 ). 2.

Appeal of Kliks

158 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1937

Justice Brown in Smith Securities Co. v. Multnomah County, 98 Or. 418 ( 192 P. 654 , 194 P. 428 ). In the Pennsylvania case the court said: “The judges when hearing these appeals, are acting as assessors of taxes”. … Multnomah County, supra; Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County, 87 Or. 462 ( 169 P. 790 ); Weyerhaeuser Land Co. v. Board of Equalization, 85 Or. 434 ( 165 P. 1164 ); Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v.

Monaghan v. School District No. 1

211 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1957

See Jory v. Martin, 153 Or 278 , 56 P2d 1093 ; State v. Merten, 175 Or 254 , 152 P2d 942 . … Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), 347 US 483, 493 , 74 S Ct 686, 691 , 98 L ed 873, 880. It is a *375 declaration to which we unhesitatingly subscribe.

State v. Miglavs

337 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 2004

State v. Miglavs, 186 Or App 420 , 63 P3d 1202 (2003). We allowed defendant’s petition for review. … See State v.

Moro v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2016

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD; Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General; and Kate Brown, Governor, Respondents. … PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, State of Oregon; and Kate Brown, Governor, State of Oregon, Respondents.

West v. Kozer

104 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1922

L. 436 ( 92 Atl. 85 , 94 Atl. 85 ); Sexton v. Newark Dist. Telegraph Co., 84 N. J. L. 83-100, 86 Atl. 451 ); Gooding v. Ott, 77 W. Va. 487 ( 87 S. E. 862 , L. R. A. 1916D, 637). … Justice Brown took no part in hearing or decision of these cases.

Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP CTY.

287 Or. 665 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1979

See ORS 197.175(1); Peterson v. City of Klamath Falls, 279 Or 249, 253-54 , 566 P2d 1193 (1977); and ORS 197.300(1)(b). … Compare Rutherford v. Armstrong, 31 Or App 1319, 1323, 1324 , 572 P2d 1331 (1977).

Olson v. STATE MORTUARY AND CEMETERY BD.

230 Or. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 19, 2009

The legislature further authorized the board to investigate any complaint concerning a licensee and, if the board finds that the licensee violated any applicable industry standards, authorized the board to impose a civil … See Advocates for Effective Regulation v.

Yamhill County v. Foster

53 Or. 124 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1909

Board of Commissioners of Jackson County v. State ex rel, 155 Ind. 604 ( 58 N. E. 1037 ). … City of Springfield v. Power, County Judge, 25 111. 187; Sangamon County v. City of Springfield, 63 111. 66; Brown v. Commissioners, 100 N. C. 92 ( 5 S. E. 178 ) ; Hamilton v. St.

Linklater v. Nyberg

234 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1963

State ex rel v. Smith et al, 197 Or 96, 126 , 252 P2d 550 ; Huffman v. Alexander, 197 Or 283, 333 , 251 P2d 87 , 253 P2d 289 ; State ex rel v. Newbry et al, 196 Or 331, 337 , 248 P2d 840 ; Perry v. … People ex rel Brown v. B’d of Apportionm’t, 52 NY 224, 227 ; Etzold v. Board of Commissioners of Huntington County (Ind) 146 NE 842, 844 .

In re Crum

103 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1922

People v. Amos, 246 Ill. 299 ( 92 N. E. 857 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 239 ). … People v. Amos, supra, note, 138 Am. St. Rep., page 243. *302 In People v. MacCabe, 18 Colo. 186 ( 32 Pac. 280 , 36 Am. St. Rep. 270 , 19 L. R.

State v. Lebanno

314 Or. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2021

State v. … State v.

State v. Finlay

257 Or. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 17, 2013

Relying on State v. … See United States v.

Nesbit v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists

291 Or. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

Based on our recent decision in King v. Dept. of Public Safety Standards , 289 Or. … Petitioner did not file timely exceptions to the board's order but did file a petition for reconsideration, which the board denied.