Case law

Pine v. State Industrial Com.

148 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1931

See, also, Schild v. Pere Marquette R. Co. (1918) 200 Mich. 614 , 166 N. W. 1018 ; Podkastelnea v. Mich. Cent. R. Co. (1917) 164 N. W. 418 ; Brown v. Weston-Mott Co., 202 Mich. 592 , 168 N. W. 437 ; Stein v. … Haiseldon v. Indus. Bo. of Ill. (Ill.) 113 N. E. 877 ; Conway v. Indus. Board (Ill.) 118 N. E. 705 ; Moustgaard v. Indus. Comm. (Ill.) 122 N. E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Indus. Bo. (Ill.) 114 N.

Texas- Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County

191 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1942

Co. v. … v.

Griffin v. Thomas

86 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1922

Among the latter are Ashley v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Fed. 55 ; Speer v. Board of County Commissioners of Kearney County, 88 Fed. 749 ; State ex rel. v. Town of Dover, 62 N. J. L. 138; The Coast Co. v. … Caldwell v. Hooker, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Leedy v. Brown, 27 Okla. 487 , 113 Pac. 177 ; Atwater v. Hassett, 27 Okla. 292 , 111 Pac. 802 ; In re Lee, 64 Okla. 310 , 168 Pac. 58 ; Dunlap v.

Young v. MacY

21 P.3d 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . In a de novo review we have plenary, independent and non-deferential authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its application of the law. Kluver v. … Court Fund of Tulsa County v. Cook, 1976 OK 180 , 557 P.2d 875 . Claims against the Court Fund must be presented to the Court Fund Board. Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Dickson Oil Co.

196 Okla. 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1946

Our conclusion here seems well supported by the following authorities cited by the commission: Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Board et al., 128 N. J. L. 611, 27 Atl. 2d 889; Raines v. … Welch & Brown, 187 Okla. 470 , 103 P. 2d 533 .

Reed v. Grady County Board of County Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 9, 2021

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … CIV-18-1257-D ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ) FOR GRADY COUNTY, et al., )

TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC

2014 OK 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2014

In Brown v. … GANT Discussed 2002 OK 76, 60 P.3d 497, IGLEHART v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ROGERS COUNTY Discussed at Length 2003 OK 90, 89 P.3d 1022, HOLLAWAY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Board of Trustees of Haworth

115 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of Ryan et al., 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Campbell v. State ex rel., 23 Okla. 109 , 99 Pac. 778 ; City of Ardmore v. State ex rel., 24 Okla. 862 , 104 Pac. 913 .

Downing v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

178 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1936

In Bentley v. … To the same effect on a similar statute, see Allen v. Brown, 6 Kan. App. 704 , 50 P. 505 . See, also, 14A C. J. 536.

Ex Parte Herrin

67 Okla. Crim. 104 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1939

Ex parte Justus, 26 Okla. 101 , 110 P. 907 ; Herndon v. Hammond, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 P. 775 ; State v. Brown, 8 Okla. Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245 , Ann. Cas. 1914C, 394; Smythe v. Smythe, 28 Okla. 266 , 114 P. 257 ; Corley v. … Fulton v. Ives, 123 Fla. 401 , 167 So. 394 ; Ex parte Kazas, 22 Cal. App. 2d 161 , 70 P. 2d 962 ; Board of Barber Examiners v. Parker, 190 La. 214, 266 , 182 So. 485 ; Herrin v.

OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

394 P.3d 1224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017

Richardson v. Board of Appeals of Chilmark, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 912 , 969 N.E.2d 727 (2012). . Richardson v. Board of Appeals of Chilmark, 969 N.E.2d at 730 . . Clarke v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

School Dist. No. 18, Garvin Co. v. Thompson

24 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1909

Board of Education of Cartersville et al. v. Purse, Next Friend, et al., 101 Ga. 422 , 28 S. E. 896 , 41 L. R. A. 593, 65 Am. St. Rep. 312 . … Donahoe v.

Tin Trong Nguyen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

108 F. Supp. 2d 1259 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1999

Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir.1985) (quoted in Campbell, 962 F.2d at 1523 ). … Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson, 654 F.2d 1382, 1387 (10th Cir. 1981). The reasoning of the court in Vo v. Greene, 63 F.Supp.2d 1278 (D.Colo.1999), is persuasive on this issue. [Although Landon [v.

Shirazi v. Childtime Learning Center, Inc.

204 P.3d 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 2009

Logan County Election Board, 2001 OK 52 , 29 P.3d 543 , to the extent that they conflicted with Kruchowski and our decision in Saint. However, we left undisturbed our previous decision of Vasek v. … In Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶19, 833 P.2d 1218 , we stated that Oklahoma law allows only one recovery to make a plaintiff whole. See also J.C. Houck v.

Bd. of Trustees of Town of Taloga v. Hadson Etc.

574 P.2d 1038 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1978

Town believes these townsites must be treated in a different manner than a platting created after the land was already settled, citing Brown v. Parker, 2 Okl. 258 , 39 P. 567 (1894). … In Folsom v.

Johnson v. Ward

541 P.2d 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1975

Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526 , Letteer v. Conservancy Dist., Okl., 385 P.2d 796 . … State Election Board, 203 Okl. 356 , 221 P.2d 774 ; Bond v. Phelps, 200 Okl. 70 , 191 P.2d 938 . Section 1302, supra, was originally adopted as § 4 of Senate Bill 300, 1945, OSL, Ch. 1c.

City Nat. Bank v. Board of Ed., City of Norman

184 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1939

Defendant admitted receiving deposits of school board money amounting to $121,356.79. … sec. 167, p. 561, states: “A bank may be held liable for the wrongful act of its officers and agents done in connection with the business of the bank and in the exercise of their apparent authority. * * *” Salt Lake City v.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1986

Zoning Board of Appeals , 75 N.E.2d 359 (Ill. 1947). Increase of volume of business alone is not an expansion. … Brown v. Gambrel , 213 S.W.2d 931 (Miss. 1948). The word "expansion" is synonymous with "enlargement." State v. Spink Hutterian Brethren , 90 N.W.2d 365 (S.D. 1958).

Wilson v. State

169 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1934

Treas., v. Brown (Iowa) 125 N. W. 248 . … Anderson v. Ritterbusch, 22 Okla. 761 , 98 P. 1002 ; Travis v. Dickey, 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 .

Sarkeys v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 40, ETC.

592 P.2d 529 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1979

Nicolson v. Citizens & Southern Nat’l Bank, 50 F.Supp. 92, 98 (S.D.Ga.1943). 7 . See A. W. Scott, “Scott on Trusts” § 391 pp. 3003, 3004 Little Brown & Co. 1977 Supp. for jurisdictions with express statutory provisions. … A relator is defined in Brown v. Nat’l Home Foundation, 162 Cal.App.2d 513 , 329 P.2d 118 (1958), 75 A.L.R.2d 427 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 (1959).