Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

2.30s

  • Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of Hoboken

    137 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1948

    Petitioners seek certiorari to review a resolution of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken, granting a permit to the defendant, Avenel Industrial Realty Corporation, for the erection of a one-story super market … In the instant case there is no finding by the Board of Adjustment that a denial of the application will cause the owner unnecessary hardship. In Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N. J. L. 1 (at p. 3), Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Central Railroad v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    98 N.J. Eq. 677 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1925

    The defense is interposed bj1" the county boards to the complainant’s bill is that the complainont, on September 1st, 1892, granted to the board of chosen freeholders the right, license and privilege of entering in and upon … In Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Erie Railroad Co., 21 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coulter v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    126 N.J.L. 130 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1941

    The assessments were affirmed by the County Board of Taxation. The State *131 Board oí Tax Appeals reduced three of the assessments and affirmed the others. … Compare Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. State Board of Tax Appeals, decided this day, 126 N. J. L. 126. The judgment is accordingly affirmed, but without costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dannenbaum v. Board of Adjustment, Atlantic City

    123 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1939

    The premises are in “Business Zone Ho. 2” and the ordinance forbids in that zone “(15) Motor vehicle service or gasoline filling station except as permitted by the Board of Adjustment.” … The resolution of the Board of Adjustment and the resolution of the Board of Commissioners were, in our judgment, without legal support, and will be set aside, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Gese

    103 N.J.L. 507 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1927

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lucas v. Board of Commissioners of Montclair

    128 N.J.L. 152 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1942

    As was said in Bursteiner v. East Orange, 2 N. J. Mis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Craven v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    130 N.J.L. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1943

    City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J. L. 407. … New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451.” See, also, Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 Id. 450.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Figula v. Board of Adjustment of Passaic

    135 N.J.L. 546 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1947

    The matter came before the Board of Adjustment on appeal from the refusal of a certificate by the supervisor of buildings and zoning officer of Passaic. … The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Adjustment held February 17th, 1947, disclose that the applicant employed less than ten employees and therefore the prohibition in section 6 (3) has no application in this instance

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Britton v. Berkeley Township Board of Education

    102 N.J.L. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1926

    Corp. 1040; State-Durant v. Jersey City, 25 N. J. L. 309; Cook v. Manasquan, 80 Id. 206; Vail v. M. & E. R. R. Co., 21 Id. 189. … Bonds 82; Packard v. Jefferson Co., 2 Col. 338 ; Vail v. M. & E. R. R. Co., supra; Smith v. Trenton, &c., Co., 17 N. J. L. 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

    8 N.J. Misc. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1930

    L. 1927, was revoked by the respondent board after a complaint and hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Macaluso v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    6 N.J. Misc. 739 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1928

    After consideration of the facts in this case as presented by the petition, and the argument of counsel, we cannot say that the action of the board of public utility commissioners was either unreasonable or an abuse of power

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newark Athletic Club v. Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 528 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 1928

    Such board of adjustment reversed the action of the building department and granted the permit. … Thereafter the Newark Athletic Club applied for a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings and decision of the board of adjustment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Walker

    6 N.J. Misc. 179 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 8, 1928

    State Board of Medical Examiners v. Geidroyc, 91 N. J. L. 61; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maza, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 73; State Board of Medical Examiners v. Jilson, 4 Id. 77. … State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 3 N. J. Adv. R. 1860. The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maza

    4 N.J. Misc. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

    v. … This is controlled by State Board v. Buettel, 3 N. J. Adv. R. 1860.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayor of Newark v. Board of Education

    30 N.J.L. 374 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1863

    This is an application by the mayor and ■common council of the city of Newark, for a mandamus against the board of education of that city, to compel the said board of education to disburse the sum of $5000, appropriated by … It is quite as independent of it as the council is of the board; and all- the connection which there is-between them, and all that they have to do with each other is, that it is made the duty of the board of education to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vander Bach v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    65 N.J.L. 522 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1900

    The relator seeks a mandamus to compel his admission to membership in the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Hudson. … That board exists under "An act to reorganize the boards of chosen freeholders in counties of the first class in this state,” passed May 16th, 1894. Gen. Stat., p. 422.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Millville v. Board of Education

    101 N.J. Eq. 303 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1927

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Jones

    4 N.J. Misc. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1926

    State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 131 Atl. Rep. 89 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. WILLIAMS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 14, 2024

    BROWN, HONORABLE KAREN M. … Petruska v. Gannon Univ., 462 F.3d 294, 302 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Mortensen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir. 1977)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Donovan v. Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders

    436 N.J. Super. 91 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 2012

    Examining Shapiro v. … Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 541-42 , 683 A.2d 818 (1996).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.