Case law

HRH Servs. LLC v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.

201 A.3d 579 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 2019

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

749 A.2d 1258 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2000

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: On April 15, 1998, the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) held a public hearing and granted the application of intervenor Richard T. … United States, 546 A.2d 1001, 1005 (D.C.1988); District of Columbia Dep’t of Human Servs. v.

Corrections Corp. of America v. National Labor Relations Board

234 F.3d 1321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 26, 2000

Passaic Daily News v. NLRB, 786 F.2d 1543, 1550 (D.C.Cir.1984) (quoting Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. NLRB, 420 F.2d 1296, 1300 (D.C.Cir.1969)). … MECO Corp. v. NLRB, 986 F.2d 1434, 1436 (D.C.Cir.1993) (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971)).

Hodge v. United Airlines

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2011

Affairs v. … However, Hodge’s statements about what his union representative told him about Brown are not admissible to prove bias by Brown. See Greer v. Paulson, 505 F.3d 1306, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (“‘Sheer hearsay’ . . .

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

88 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1996

In Re Sumner

665 A.2d 986 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1995

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, David G. … Marshall’s stepbrother, Thereon Brown, and Mr. Brown’s mother, Diane Wingfield. H.C.R. at 2. Mr.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

487 F.2d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

See NLRB v. Granite State Joint Board, supra; id. at 218, 93 S.Ct. 385 , 34 L.Ed.2d 422 (Mr. … Scofield v. NLRB, supra, 394 U.S. at 443 , 89 S.Ct. at 1159 , 22 L.Ed.2d 385 . To be sure, the Labor Board is entitled to great deference when it interprets the act it administers. See, e. g., Brooks v.

John D. Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia, Board of Appeals & Review

268 A.2d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1970

Nee Zap v. United States 328 U.S. 624, 628 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946). … Accordingly, the decision of the District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review is Affirmed.

Independent Bankers Ass'n of America v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

557 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 1982

As the Supreme Court has noted in a recent case, “[i]t would have been difficult for Congress to give the Bank Board a broader mandate.” Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association v. … Guardian Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, 589 F.2d 658, 664 (D.C.Cir.1978); Pesikoff v.

Lang v. Wood

92 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1937

See Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 498 , 16 S.Ct. 631 , 40 L.Ed. 780 ; Yaselli v. Goff (C.C.A.) 12 F.(2d) 396 , 56 A.L.R. 1239 ; De Arnaud v. Ainsworth, 24 App.D.C. 167 , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.) 163; Farr v. … Valentine, 38 App.D.C. 413 , Ann.Cas.l913C, 821; Brown v. Rudolph, 58 App.D.C. 116 , 25 F.(2d) 546 ; Mellon v. Brewer, 57 App.D.C. 126 , 18 F.(2d) 168 , 53 A.L.R. 1519 , and cases therein cited.

Drug Plastics & Glass Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

30 F.3d 169 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1994

See Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. … (footnotes omitted); NLRB v.

Local Lodge No. 1424 v. National Labor Relations Board

264 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 1959

Co. v. … We therefore uphold the Board’s order under the authority of N.L.R.B. v. Gaynor News Co., supra, 2 Cir., 1952, 197 F.2d 719 , affirmed sub nom. Radio Officers’ Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A.F.L. v.

Consolidated Delivery & Logistics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

63 F. App'x 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2003

We owe deference to the Board’s judgment if it is supported by substantial evidence, Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 374-75 , 118 S.Ct. 818 , 139 L.Ed.2d 797 (1998), and it is not otherwise inconsistent with the law, NLRB v.

George A. Hormel and Company v. National Labor Relations Board

962 F.2d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1992

If he did not, then, as the Board held, Hormel committed an unfair labor practice by discharging him. Cf. NLRB v. … Because there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s conclusion to the contrary, see Universal Camera Corp. v.

Eckert v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

925 A.2d 550 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2007

KING, Senior Judge: Petitioner, James V. … Bausch v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Bd., 855 A.2d 1121, 1124 (D.C.2004) (quoting Beckman v.

In Re Goldman

910 A.2d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2006

See e.g., In re Angel, 889 A.2d 993 (D.C.2005) (per curiam); In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002) (per curiam). 1 No party has objected to the proposed sanction. … Bar Counsel has advised the court that he takes no exception to the Board’s recommendation.

Local 14055, United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations Board

524 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1975

In Labor Board v. … V The Board’s position has its persuasiveness. It would be more persuasive were the Board free of Tree Fruits.

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

88 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1996

Wmata v. Does

926 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2007

According to this provision, the Review Board "may not consider the evidence de novo and make factual findings different from those of the examiner." Marriott Int'l v. … What the Board could not do was issue an award of compensation.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

584 F.3d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2009

Similarly, in City of Portland v. … Discount Corp. v.