Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • Easton North v. Franklin Township Board of Adjustment

    95 N.J. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Hackettstown Education Ass'n v. Hackettstown Board of Education

    89 N.J. 429 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Board of Trustees v. J.P. Fybe, Inc.

    96 N.J. 308 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mc Laughlin v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    62 N.J. 84 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 3, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Warren Hospital

    54 N.J. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1969

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Municipal Board of Adjustment

    49 N.J. 369 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 29, 1967

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Piscataway Township Board of Education v. Burke

    79 N.J. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 19, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deal Gardens, Inc. v. Board of Trustees

    47 N.J. 575 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Nutley v. Ernst

    123 N.J.L. 373 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1939

    The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court — Board of Commissioners of the Town of Nutley, &c., v. Charles J. A. Ernst et al., 120 N. J. L. 68. … Kirkland v. McCloud, 80 N. J. L. 337.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sedlak v. Board of Commissioners of Bayonne

    136 N.J.L. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 1947

    city is fatally injured while on duty, either in *136 the performance or attempted performance of a duty connected with employment in the department or of any extra or special duty upon which he is detailed, the municipal board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reilly v. Board of Education of Camden

    127 N.J.L. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 23, 1941

    The ease turns on the meritorious question of whether or not the statute applies to an employee of a Board of Education. The statutes, N. J. S. … The only case directly in point to which our attention has been called is Freilitzsch v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 7 N. J. Mis. R. 7.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Essex County Board of Taxation

    122 N.J.L. 158 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 17, 1939

    .” *159 In the case of Jersey City v. Davis, 80 N. J. L. 609, a similar situation existed in a mandamus case and two rules to show cause were ordered quashed because not entered in time. In the later case of Singer v. … In Emma v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Blechschmidt

    6 N.J. Misc. 682 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1928

    So far, in this court, it is not an open question, but is controlled by such cases as State Board of Medical Examiners of New Jersey v. De Young, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 231, and the State Board of Medical Examiners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Mayor of Hoboken

    89 N.J.L. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1916

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. West Shore Railroad

    85 N.J.L. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1914

    The features of this case are substantially identical with those in the case of Ridgefield Park v. New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Co., ante p. 279.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Decker v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

    87 N.J.L. 316 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1914

    The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the ease of Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, decided January 7th, 1915, ante p. 179.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shell Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    37 N.J. 134 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trenton v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    91 N.J.L. 719 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1918

    The Supreme Court based its judgment affirming the order made by the board of public utilities upon the single ground that an ordinance passed by the city of Trenton in 1909 constitutes a contract that bound not only the

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    2 N.J. Misc. 952 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1924

    This assessment was affirmed on appeal to. the Camden county board of taxation and the state board of taxes and assessment. … The judgments of the county and state boards are affirmed and the assessment of $65,000 confirmed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation

    91 N.J.L. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 24, 1917

    Long Dock Co. v. State Board, 78 N. J. L. 44; affirmed, 79 Id. 604. … The. first of these propositions is illustrated in the classic case of State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., 48 N. J. L. 146, and the second in the more recent case of Tippett v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.